Sometimes I get the feeling that politics is the Theatre of the Absurd, as drama and playacting fuel hyperbolic lies, half-truths, outrageous, unproved, unevidenced accusations, manufactured issues, show-trial-like hearings, and crises to grab headlines. It just adds to the frustration and feeling that politics is hopeless and bewildering, and makes you feel anxious, so why bother to care or counter? Despite this, those who support the rule of law have no choice but to soldier on and call out such abuses of power and the legal system if democracy is to survive intact.
Case in point: The hearing held recently in which Dr. Anthony Fauci and MAHA locked horns was the GOP at their"performative" best to cater to the hardcore supporters of the anti-vaxx movement. Nothing substantive was accomplished, and by taking the 5th, Dr. Fauci avoided traps the GOP tried to lay for him to make a statement they could use and manipulate in a state court hearing. That's what the initial spat at the beginning of the hearing, resulting in removal of Fauci's attorney, was about. There are still MAHA-inspired cases accusing Fauci of unevidenced wrongdoing pending in state courts, even though Fauci has the protection from federal cases due to the pardons Biden provided. He is not shielded from state laws. Not to let go of this debacle, the GOP is planning to hold Fauci in contempt, compounding one abuse of power with another one.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/29/anthony-fauci-senate-covid-hearing-takeaways
Like so much of Trump's revenge tour, with nearly all such accusations presented without supporting evidence or legal basis being thrown out by judges, it is just another tool to use in political propaganda warfare. It is used to make a point and to punish the disloyal to Trump and MAGA by forcing their targets to spend emotional energy and money on their defense. The practice is plain and simple: an abuse of power to which the judicial system has wised up to and is referring Trump's attorneys to local bar associations for disbarment.
Since the 2020 election, judges have not tolerated the political theatre of the absurd in their courtrooms, though disciplinary action takes time. Disbarment of lawyers has resulted,, first in the wake of 2020's "stop the steal" , and now again in numerous cases in Trump's second term.
https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/trump-2020-attorneys-face-disbarment-suspension-ahead-of-2024-election/
Last month, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche’s alleged misbehavior was referred to the New York State Bar for disciplinary review regarding a pending "fraud upon the court" inquiry. A separate IRS litigation ruling and complaints also targeted Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward at the District of Columbia Bar.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/09/26/rudy-giuliani-disbarred-washington-00181183
"Theatre of the Absurd, dramatic works of certain European and American dramatists of the 1950s and early ’60s who agreed with the Existentialist philosopher Albert Camus’s assessment, in his essay “The Myth of Sisyphus” (1942), that the human situation is essentially absurd, devoid of purpose. The term is also loosely applied to those dramatists and the production of those works. Though no formal Absurdist movement existed as such, dramatists as diverse as Samuel Beckett, Eugène Ionesco, Jean Genet, Arthur Adamov, Harold Pinter, and a few others shared a pessimistic vision of humanity struggling vainly to find a purpose and to control its fate. Humankind in this view is left feeling hopeless, bewildered, and anxious." Enclopedia Britannica.

