Tuesday, July 28, 2026

The answer to extremists on both the right and the left iis a vigorous pro-democracy movement

The recent success of both MAGA and the Democratic Socialists of America is an alarm bell clanging loudly that extremism in the guise of sheep-bleating appealing messages is wolves in sheep's clothing who lust after the manipulation or outright end of democracy, including replacement by autocracy,  to gain control for their narrow and defined interests. The answer to combatting extremism from both left and right, my friends, is to fight like hell for democracy as we have known it. Reform to strengthen it, cherry-pick some pubic policy ideas from either camp you like or object to, but be glad those of you in the middle can still have the ability to make your voices heard now and in the future.  Democracy is a benefit that includes all of those that are governed ....not just a benefit for one class, or race, or religion, that provides a level field for those aspiring to get their priorities on the table for consideration without fear of retribution and punishment by government.

The answer to the emergence of these extremists is to reveal hidden or open agendas and to promote, not just protect, the structure of democracy we have had for 250 years and to strengthen it.   At issue with both extremists is who controls the policies and powers of government: the people of all stripes who have the ability and chance to influence the direction of leaders, or is it the rule in use of power and policies by one ideology, or "strong leader," an autocracy, who issues edicts and orders as laws to be followed?.  

 Both Democratic Socialists and MAGA have it as a strategy to alter the form of representative democracy as we have known it and reshape it to their advantage. If not the form is altered, there are other ways to subvert and reshape it to help accomplish their goals. Their proposals are not equal or alike in the details, but do share some characteristics. Both Democratic Socialists and MAGA are about what kinds of control over issues of who can and how people vote. Both are essentially anti-democratic because they subtly or openly advocate that one particular economic or social or racial class should rule over the rest of us using the tools of fear and/or favor.  

MAGA's agenda is subtle and often unspoken, but by their deeds, actions, and suppression of opposition's rights, and those they try to suppress are the tell-tales.  To get where they are going is a matter of deduction. On the other hand, the platform of the Democratic Socialists of America is right there for you to read at https://program.dsausa.org/.  Do a Google or ChatGPT search for better bluntness and clarity.   The question becomes what part of this platform does a candidate running as a democratic socialist support. It may vary a great deal, but the exposure is fair game and easy to do.  When it comes to pinning down MAGA candidates, watch for evasion and code words and dog whistles.  That is much more of a challenge, since overt racism is still not politically acceptable, making it hard to get at to what extent it is a factor. Instead, there is more reliance on deduction of observed impacts, practices, and public policy issue stances.

The platform of the Democratic Socialists of America is now under attack by MAGA, and a walk through Google reveals their real goals: restructuring our form of democracy to give power, not to all of the people, but to one economic class, and the elimination of capitalism. There will be plenty of others from the right to decry this platform and call it out.  It is all there in black and white and in print. and easy to do, but in calling it out, the challenge should be truthful and not place unsupported planks onto every candidate who claims affiliation with Democratic Socialists.  The movement may have a written platform, but adherence is not uniform.    However, there are those in the left who will correctly call out the MAGA movement's portion that empowers white nationalists,, while suppressing those who rightfully object to attempts to control their rights to vote,  or to participate in governance to which they have been entitled by law to do so, and puts an undo burden on large swathes of women and elderly who will find themselves disengranchised by the harshness of the SAVE act to prove citizenship.

On the other hand, the MAGA platform is also an attempt to change the democracy of rule, by and for the people, to rule by one party for the benefit of one leader, for the benefit of a specific cultural/racial group and suppression of those who oppose that. What is driving it is mostly not spoken, or in print,  but what, in dulcet tones, it promotes if rule by white Christians by their actions.  There is no written platform other than a carefully phrased blueprint in the documents of Project 2025.  IN that regard, the MAGA movement is more insidious than Democratic Socialists, but what issues and practices MAGA promotes are also just as destructive of democracy.  The old "by their deeds you will know them," like the replacement of those of color in the halls of DC and the Pentagon, and actions of ICE and others trampling civil rights, such actions are the marker of a movement whose focus and purpose is to boost those of a certain race and gender.  Democracy is government by participation of all of the people, not just for a chosen socio/econommic/racial group.

Neither Democratic Socialists nor MAGA represent the views of most Americans, who are either not aware of how their control of who governs them is being taken away or are too absorbed with day-to-day life to pay attention. Effective politicians may make hay by painting a political party as taken over by extremists or name-calling them as fascists or communists, but it is not that simple. Simple memes and slogans are for simple minds.  Take the time to think and demand answers.  Ask individual candidates a question: do you want one party, one person, to tell you what to vote for and to disadvantage you if you speak out, or are afraid to. My guess is, most Americans would want to be in control, and not controlled by  some one-party, one-ideology, with overt or hidden agendas.  Americans as a whole are just not into political science or ideology so long as they can vote and have a say.   The NO Kings marches, anti-ICE demonstrations against concentration camps, outrage against ICE brutality,  and the demonstrators' success in changing the outcome show that the power is still with the people. However,  if either Democratic Socialists or MAGA have their way, that too, the will of the people, can be shifted away in favor of the rule of one economic class or racial/cultural class.   Democracy is a system that allows for all to be heard to convince others to follow without fear of reprisals.. Democracy is not for the benefit of selected groups to lead and control over others they disdain.. Neither Democratic Socialists nor MAGA look to govern in the benefit of all in their jurisdictions with even-handed fairness. Instead, both favor benefitting some groups over others. MAGA even uses or tolerates threats and fear with unevidenced pretenses to enforce loyalty beyond the ballot box. 

The answer to both extremes is for the great American middle to become aware and alarmed by either extreme end and to support candidates who will represent all Americans, not just their ideological kin, and who support the institutions of Democracy that have served us well. None should rule out reforming those parts that need reform, especially those concerning grift, corruption,  and exploitation of the weaker, however.  There are loopholes and ways through and around laws unimagined by our founders.

 In micro terms, when specific planks of the extremists are frightening to many, each candidate must be asked if they approve what their ideology/religion promotes.  Step one is learning what either extremist movement truly sees as their end game and how they strive to empower a narrow interest that suppresses yours.  Step two is to support and elect candidates who, likewise, support democracy as we have known it for 250 years, which, in the long run, keeps all people being governed with fair and equal exercise of democracy. 

The alternative to democracy is rule by one or a few, with rights of the opposition suppressed by various means and degrees.  This past year and a half illustrates what happens when those put their trust in one person, and that person goes off the rails, and there is no good recourse, except the ballot box.  Trump was elexted in 2024 by promoses of no more foreign wars, and a reduction of the cost of lving: He has now done the opposite, and given his rule by fear and favor, there is no way out of this excepy by fair and free elections, not elections with voting and tabulaiton contorlled by his federal loyalists, but by the fragmentation and folliwing the rules laid out in every jurisdiction to ensure that the vote and count are open with many bi-partisan eyes on the process and not under threat by armed representatives of the federal government.

What is MAGA. How do you define it? The British tried to explain it in their recent AI version of their famous encyclopedia, but it was mostly a description and history of its trail of beliefs. https://www.britannica.com/topic/MAGA-movement. 

Merriam-Webster :political movement calling for strict limits on immigration and a return to policies and practices in place before globalization and especially before the era of globalization that began in the late 20th century"

Wikipedia :'Defining elements of MAGA include Republicans who voted for Trump in the 2020 presidential election and deny the results of that election,[2] cult-like behavior as followers of Trump, [3] political radicalisation, white nationalism,[4] anti-immigrant beliefs (including nativism), an emotionally intense sense of shared identity, resentment of specific groups of people, identity fusion, moral self-righteousness, belief in social dominance orientation, and prejudiced aggressiveness.[

My own definition and a pretty sure indication you are a MAGA:ifYou wear the red MAGA hat and still claim the 2020 election really elected Trump.  Election denialism is a mantra that those loyal to MAGA and Trump must utter to qualify as a member of the movement.  It is more than just a pledge of allegiance to Trump and a membership ritual in MAGA. It is MAGA's foundation and rationale of the Jan 6th attempted coup, of federal one-party takeover of elections determining who can vote, how they can vote, and who counts and keeps control of the ballots (SAVE ACT), and the basis for ICE cruelty, paramilitarism,  and concentration camp internments, since the 2 or has been;  just believe)



a


 

Thursday, July 23, 2026

Tomfoolery Trump tells tales to trick his own troops

Tomfoolery Trump tells tales to trick his own troops.  Here is what I picked up in an interface with MAGA in another FB page:

 Trump's trickery used to fool his followers emerged recently in two issues: 1." If the Gulf of Hormuz and Red Sea ports closed, no problem for prices of gas at the pump because the US is self-sufficient. "We do not need foreign oil," he claims. "Plenty of supply," he says. Low-informed voters do not understand that the price per barrel is set by cartels looking at supplies all over the world, and Trump cannot control that. The amount of supplies we have domesticly do not affect prices. 2." So what's so bad about having to show a picture ID? Libs oppose SAVE because they fear it will show illegals changed the results." Low-information voters swallow that one, too. What Tomfoolery Trump does not tell you is that your driver's license and a whole list of other photo IDs do not prove your citizenship: Only certified birth certificates and proof of any name changes since birth, or a current passport, will suffice under SAVE rules since proof of citizenship is the point of the legislation. Women especially are the ones who will scramble if this SAVE Act passes since they likely did not keep their birth last name when they got married or unless recently retired, do not have current valid passports.

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/07/plain-english-explainer-of-how-trump-is.html  

https://bipartisanpolicy.org/article/five-things-to-know-about-the-save-act/


Plain English. explainer of how Trump is trying to fool his followers not to fear gas prices hikes if Hormuz or the Red Sea closed

 What Trump says about the price is gas at the pump is vintage Trump trickery. He depends on voters’ignorance to explain away why what you see and feel does not resemble his version of the truth. He tells you that the US has plenty of oil, so it makes no difference if the Hormuz or Red Sea oil shipments are blocked, and you wonder why, when you fill up, the price immediately reflects the threat of closing either. He is talking about supply, but at the same time, we are paying more to fill up. Yes, we will not have a shortage, but the price per barrel is not in his control. Foreign cartels set the price based on worldwide supplies on that day. If a shortage in supply elsewhere in the world happens, we get the price hike regardless, even if we have no change in supply. The president can release strategic reserves or reduce federal taxes that fund highway improvements,..but if there are no strategic reserves in the tank…that is useless, and the improvement funds are obligated for a year or two; that one doesn’t help soon either. In short, Trump is fibbing and fooling and hoping you do not catch on.

So why do prices rise in the US too? Because our US oil producers sell on the world market and they want the same high price that everyone else in the world sells their for.

The US strategic reserves are the lowest now since 1983.https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MCSSTUS1&f=M


https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/081315/opec-vs-us-who-controls-oil-prices.asp


Friday, July 17, 2026

Trump last night inadvertently gave the reasons of why voting systems need to be in control of individual states

 My takeaway from Trump's address last night is not that Trump made a case for federal control of elections, but that he made the case for 50 states (or even 18 swing states)to continue keeping their own individual control. Why? It is far more difficult to control the mechanics of the vote, including the counting and casting methods, by dealing with 50 separate systems and state laws, especially if bipartisan or public eyes are a part of the process, than it is if the methods are in one federal hand.

Update i7/22/2026. OOOps. It happened. 400 non-citizens did vote in NJ in 2024, though the impact was 0 on the outcome. Kudos for NJ Governor for taking responsibility and reporting it. I wonder if other states had the same computer glitch. that was found on audit by NJ itself. Also, of the thousands of non-citizens who could have voted, only a relatively few actually voted. This at least shows another reason why not having federally run elections .Since this was a glitch in the motor/voter system, it was not an intentional crime or conspiracy to paint it as one."A small number of ineligible ballots can affect the outcome in very close elections, but such occurrences are exceedingly rare. Sherrill won her 2025 election by nearly half a million votes. In all, 3.3 million ballots were cast in that election, and 400 ineligible votes would amount to about one one-hundredth of a percent of all votes cast." per news reports by NSNOW

Trump's threat is that he will ignore the states' results and seize control of the ballots or other evidence post-election day using force (ICE, FBI, National Guard?) if necessary, destroying any credible chain of evidence that partisan hands tinkered or did not tinker with the evidence.. In the name of voter integrity,, Trump's actions would destroy their integrity.

Some, like Tom Rogers, have recently expressed fears that the anger of street demonstrators that resulted would then give Trump the rationale to declare a national emergency and bring in the troops to take over. Bye-bye, democracy, as the 2026 midterms are overturned. That is a scenario that is not far-fetched, given Trump's past attempts, stopped by his military aides and the Joint Chiefs, in his first term during the George Floyd/Lafayette Square unrests. He wanted to call in the military to shoot the demonstrators in the legs.https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/msnbc-founder-tom-rogers-trump-130000874.html

The fragmentation of election rules that are supervised at the county level in any case, makes it very difficult to rig or fix an election for state or presidential elections. A good example of that is that three county clerks in Colorado followed Trump's orders to "secure" the ballots, meaning only Trump minions could control them for his benefit and tinkering, locking them up away from bipartisan eyes...All three were removed from supervising elections by the state's Secretary of State. One of those clerks who attempted a cover-up, Tina Peters, became Trump's poster child of approval for doing that despite her being sent to prison for violating state laws designed to prevent that act, convicted by a jury and losing her appeals.. Even then, one county like hers did not make a difference in the statewide or presidential electoral count. It is feared Trump will try to do that on a much wider scale, nationwide, using a pretext of suspicion without evidence to justify such seizures or on his orders..

Any evidence that even Russia tried to use active measures to support Trump in 2020 while simultaneously China tried to achieve the opposite is not in doubt. That either succeeded in hacking or breaking into the mechanics of the vote is without evidence and reported so by Trump's own intelligence services and directors in charge when Trump was their boss. There is a difference between foreign actors and illegal voters trying active measures and actually tinkering with the mechanics and methods that changed the outcome that those bad actors wanted. Thanks to diffused 50 state systems, they failed to change the outcome.
Protecting those who are in charge of the ballots is the most important factor in determining whether the elections are fair and free. 98 percent of ballots cast are cast on paper by hand (all mail-in ballots and all in polling places in Colorado are on paper) If a mechanical machine is used, there is a printout of their vote on a machine given to the voter, for the record,, and therefore subject to verification by ninjas and interminable audits by officials per their own state rules and regulations. Those have been ongoing for 6 years, and still no evidence has been found that would have changed any outcome in 2020 or 2024.

The ultimate potential interference in any election is who controls the paper, handwritten or printout of those ballots post-election day, as well as other physical evidence. One party ordering armed federal agents under the control of that party is not to be trusted, no matter which political party it is. However, that is what the Trump administration is trying to make a case for by whipping up public sentiment with reports of attempts by foreign actors or non-citizens to spread their propaganda. Still, there is no evidence they hacked the voting and tabulation systems or changed the outcome. John Ratcliffe, former director of national intelligence under Trump v.1 and now director of the CIA. in Trump v.II. He is in the position to know, and he ought to testify to Congress under oath.. Getting voting lists? No hacking needed; just look online or order and pay for it from a service. The actual systems were the same and in place in both elections. The only difference is that Trump lost in 2020 and won in 2024.
There will be many loyal MAGA who will accept what Trump claimed as the gospel truth and never give it another thought or question it. So ask yourselves, MAGA, when Trump won in 2024, the election went just fine even though nothing had changed regarding the mechanics of voting systems. In fact, his opponents were in power at that time. The only difference was that in 2020 Trump lost, and in 2024 he won.


There will be many voices objecting to Trump's "address" to the country last night and calling out his lies. Whether MAGA preferred press reports them will be interesting to observe.

For data on 98% of votes already are cast on paper or with a paper trail,

Fragmentation of election rules and control at the county level: https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/election-administration-at-state-and-local-levels

Threats by Trump to seize election evidence using. law enforcement to do so: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/preparing-law-enforcement-demands-election-materials


Felicia Muftic is a former Denver elections official.