Wednesday, May 20, 2026

J6 convicted insurrectionists got " mistreated by the legal system". What a crock.

 The Trump slush fund is now getting the go-ahead by the Duma, like the GOP-dominated Congress of Trump yes, congresspeople to put a billion,7k . of taxpayer money for whatever use the Trump regime wants...including compensating January 6 insurrectionists for "being mistreated by the justice system" and "weaponized" by the DOJ or the IRS. Not only would this slush fund benefit J6 criminals and the Trump family, it is a crock of doo doo. Define being" mistreated.". Define weaponization. One of the key legitimate treatments of the legal system is that evidence counts, that actual laws were broken when both grand and trial, a jury of peers...find them guilty. Did any of the Jan6 found guilty idi not receive due process or ignore the rules of evidence, and did the jury system function correctly? Did the ones found guility appealed it and did they lose? ywa. So prove there was mistreatment, JD Vance, who claimed the slush fund use. Here is what "mistreatment" means:. How about the Trump strategy of revenge that uses a DOJ that files flimsy charges without any evidence of probable cause just to cost their revenge targets to defend themselves expensively. These charges are often tossed out by a judge because of a lack of evidence or the flimsy DOJ legal case, and they can't even make it through a grand jury finding of probable cause. How about using that slush fund to compensate for the revenge treatment by the Trump-run DOJ against his political enemies that are frivolous and do not make it even to the early stages of the trial system...

The final insult of the slush fund establishment: Protects Trump and family from IRS prosecution.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/19/trump-irs-settlement-tax-returns

https://www.themountaineer.com/news/national/vance-defends-dojs-nearly-1-8b-weaponization-fund/article_09fe2270-3f58-56bb-b299-bb64dc99c98e.html



https://abcnews.com/US/list-individuals-including-lisa-cook-targeted-trump-administration/story?id=124968309

Tuesday, May 19, 2026

Why has the big lie, 2020 election was stolen, lived on for 6 years?

 From my Facebook post 5/19/2026:

Andrew Weissmann noted in his just-released book " Liar's Kingdom, " which focused on the claims of fraud in the 2020 election, and made a statement about it on TV that particularly got my attention. Every judge who looked at such claims brought their courts of the 2020 steal, dismissed the cases, and could find no probable cause in the evidence presented to even permit the case to go on.
The lie has been the Trump administration's stated rationale for the plan to rig the 2026 November midterm elections so they could win while losing the popular will as well as the treatment of January 6 participants to pay them off, pardon, and stick a middle finger at jury trials and due legal process.
The next question I ask is why this lie (stop the steal) has lived on and now fuels the Trump plan to rig the results of the November 2026 midterm elections.
Trump's plan is no secret: ICE at every polling place in potentially swing districts where those looking Hispanic could be intimidated, grabbing the election ballots, destroying their integrity when in the hands of partisans, and the extreme gerrymandering boundary drawings.

Trump loyalists nod their heads in support of the lie when challenged because either they blindly believe it because it came out of the mouth ot Trump or because they approve of what Trump wants, too.:Tte result
Trump is seeking to win despite the dismal polls, when they should have lost.

More thoughts not in the Facebook post.



Weissmann answers a question of why those who lie in pursuit of a political position can get away with it, while those who defame or defraud a person or a consumer when they know they are lying can face a jury and either jail or a large financial penalty or restitution. I always assumed the reason was the First Amendment, and it is under that umbrella that a marketplace of ideas is where winners are chosen by voters. The problem is that voters themselves may not have access or knowledge of an intentional lie to make that kind of intelligent decision, and even opponents do not have the ammunition to call them out. I also believe that there are those who, for other reasons, ignore evidence even when they know it is a lie because they have self-serving reasons and motivations to use it to accomplish other goals driven by. racial, social conformity, or economic self-interest. That issue has festered in my mind, though Weissmann tackled it and gave me pause to reconsider just passing it off as "the value of the marketplace of ideas" and people exercising their First Amendment rights. He presents some solutions to that seeming contradiction in the second half of the book..which I have yet to fully digest, but get the gist and skimmed. That part is the best grist for the law student, law professor, or the legislation drafting mill.

I was the administrator of a district attorney's consumer fraud office for nearly seven years, followed by a position in the city administration that also made me an elections official for nearly seven years. Freedom of political speech, and civil, and/or criminal consumer fraud consumed me for much of my professional years. Although I'm not a lawyer, I made an impact in that position, setting priorities and advocating for fair treatment in voting and the consumer marketplace. As AI technology and the ability to manipulate photos and videos become common, the question of lying in the political marketplace of ideas is no longer nagging, but it has an urgency to be considered and addressed. Weissmann's book is very important and timely. Weissmann drew on how other Western democracies split hairs about walking the fine line between free speech and doing harm with lies to the system or to citizens. It was not without a smile that I read his description of how Brazil treated political lies as similar to the truth-in-advertising approach in consumer protection. The penalties were to "disbar" or deny the one found guilty from running for office for x years. (US impeachment and a guilty verdict disbars forever. In the meantime, lies can be exposed by investigative reporters and congressional hearings, which explains why the midterms and who is in the majority in Congress are such high stakes to both sides in November.


Saturday, May 16, 2026

On Gov Polis' granting clemency to Tina Peters sets a dangerous precedence for federal control of elections

 We have a challenge to save free and fair elections if we want to preserve democracy., Trump has other plans. Trump believes that his control over the election outcomes can be accomplished by empowering his supporters to control who gets to vote and who has the keys to tabulating the outcome of the vote across the nation. Governor Polis sets a dangerous precedent in granting clemency to Tina Peters just as Trump schemes to control the outcome of the 2026 November midterm elections. 

 Included in these Trump plans are to grab voter rolls information from states he and the GOP can use to suppress or promote the outcome, and to use federal forces to seize control of machines used by citizens to vote and the tabulation of results. This is no secret.  Trump made Tina Peters the test case and the cause celibre.  Polis just granted Trump a win and a template for how this power-preserving president thinks he can control the 2026 midterm outcome since the Colorado governor caved into Trump's demands to "free Tina Peters". Polis claimed Trump's threats did not influence his clemency grant, but it certainly appears that way and appearance counts in Trump's world.

The Colorado Secretary of State, Jena Griswold, had refused to turn over the voter information Trump had demanded and stood by the prosecution and outcome of the Peters case in the face of Trump's attempt to federalize elections, despite Constitutional provisions to the contrary. The fear is that Trump would use those rolls and the information provided to support or suppress voter turnout and results in the midterms of November 2026 to keep his control of Congress.  ​Trump administration again requests sensitive Colorado voter data, state declines | Colorado Newsline and then sued the state of Colorado.

Peters was found guilty by a jury that she gave those codes and access to a  MAGA volunteer to the voting tallying machine in defiance of state rules and state criminal law designed to. keep that from happening. She took her orders from Trump et al to "secure " the machines he issued via media. She did not take her orders from her oath to follow state laws and election procedure rules. Unlike the January 6 pardons of crimes committed under federal law, crimes committed under state laws are not subject to federal crime-related pardons.

The attempt by Trump to grab control of elections is no secret..and neither are the details of plans to do so on behalf of the GOP dominated by MAGA. Such actions Peters tried cannot go unpunished if we sincerely care about election integrity.  The issue is whether she was too harshly punished.  There was no issue about whether the jury trial and the sentencing guidelines the judge used were incorrect, or whether the findings in a trial that she committed the felony were procedurally wrong. She was found guilty of violating state laws by a correct jury, and Polis' actions did not change that fact. She had already served half of her 9 year sentence.

 At stake is the issue that the Trump argument for federal control over state voting laws is bogus, that the 2020 election was stolen. That is a false pretext. It has been 6 years, plenty of time,  for MAGA  to provide proof that it happened, and zero evidence has been found. That would have changed the outcome. Instead, this "stop the steal" pretext is not driven by a pious concern over vote integrity, but it is a strategy by Trump et al to have the party in power, his, to control the outcome of the vote count. .

 At issue is that Polis caved into threats by Trump et al to cut federal funding to federal programs for Colorado citizens if Peters were not freed.  Polis denied that it was why he "freed Peters", but it most certainly looks like it and sets a dangerous precedent that other states could also cave in and follow in the face of their resistance to the Trump power grab.

It is a warning to those of us who care about state control of elections as a way to counter a wannabe dictator from using underhanded tactics to thwart the outcome of elections he fears may not go his way.  

Felicia Muftic is a former Denver elections official

https://www.cpr.org/2026/05/15/tina-peters-sentence-shortened-jared-polis/  Excellent in-depth story and Polis' reasoning of why

​Trump administration again requests sensitive Colorado voter data, state declines | Colorado Newsline

Case is currently pending in federal court, with a decision awaited on a motion to dismiss filed by the state...per AI

Trump threatened Colorado funding as ‘punishment’ oa  ver Tina Peters, judge finds - Democracy Docket   Snap funds defunding threatened

Beware of Novel Claims of 2020 Election Fraud | Brennan Center for Justice  On evidence of 2020 election fraud 

Friday, May 15, 2026

Is America in decline? If it is, Trump engineered it.

 


Feed posts


Shared with Public


From Felicia Muftic's post May 15, 2026 on Facebook.

Trump's flattery of Xi got him a response: America is in decline. If Xi was referring to America's power in foreign affairs, the ability to shape the world in ways that benefit America's national interests, Xi has a point....Except we were not in decline, but we have been weakened on purpose by a president who engineered our decline. America First, isolationism, ticking off our once allies and best friends, threatening to invade and grab their properties, imposing tariffs on our biggest trading partners, de facto knee-capping NATO, and Article 5, cozying up to the world's tyrants like Putin, has resulted in the loss of the USA's ability to influence what we once called the"free world". Trump no longer wants to join together with our largest trading partners in mutual defense and economic strength. Our allies from Japan to Anzac now fear he is going to trade off Taiwan to get XI's help in digging Trump himself out of his Iran blunder. Ukraine is surviving without Trump. and has revolutionized modern drone warfare with the financial assistance of the EU, freed by the demise of the stumbling block, Hungary's Orban, and Germany is now rearming itself... The US military alone could not effect regime change in Iran, which has dug in underground. And the result, Iran may never feel it has to agree to any nuclear deal. They still have the Hormuz card to play.

The result is that the world no longer dances to a tune they once liked coming from America, and is learning to live on its own tune, not ours. They do not trust us. In Europe, polls show over 60 to 70 percent of EU and UK citizens despise, dislike, and disapprove of Trump. and any of their politicians who would like to cozy up to Trump would face political death. If that is the America First you desired, it is what you got.