Real populism is governing in public interest, not a small knot of elitist governing in their self interest

Real populism is governing in the public interest and not governing in the self-interest of those rich, politically connected, and the billionaires. One form of populism is economic. Another is techbro populism. Sadly, another form is racist. All are at work in America today, and more than one might dwell in the hearts and minds of some voters at the same time.

Economic populism is an easy concept to grasp. Recent articles in the Atlantic magazine have been focusing on the influence of the techno bros, the chiefs of high-tech industries, who are the recent drivers of anti-democracy fascist like influences in the White House and pubic policy. It explains why these newly minted oligarchs love Putin, Orban, and CPAC, as their businesses flourish when government is shaped to support their economic well-being.  The only population they consider is their own and not the rest of us.  

One of the characteristics of populist movements in the past, the Tea Party, and even MAGA has always been a resentment of elites controlling their lives and making their lives, working class and even many in the middle class, economically difficult.  This is largely based on economic concerns... especially since consumers are the ones who feel the pain. 

Techbro populism is another matter. The Atlantic's recent article by George Packer fingers the culprits as those who surround and influence Trump, such as Peter Thiel and Elon Musk, and others. (JD Vance is a protege of Thiel. Musk, a native of South Africa, echoes the racist and elitist makeup of fascists of the 1930's and the apartheid supporters of the last century. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/2026/06/david-sacks-crypto-ai-venture-capital/686941/

  This new techbro populism is the polar opposite of economic populism: These techbros want a government that helps their businesses and serves their interests, led by a small group of elites who run the government to advance their self-interested goals. However, another element has been part of the techbros mantra. It is anti-elite: extreme libertarian and "keep the government out of my business." However, it has recently changed. It is a new realization that government action is okay "when it helps my business through favorable tax and administrative policies". Libertarianism is a long-held populist concept held by many. "The best government is the least government" is their frequently uttered mantra. There is a strong anti-elitist streak in its followers.  Brotech populism is self-contradictory: it is both elitist and anti-elitist at the same time.  The impact, though, is anti populist and elitist. Techbros often do not care, or may not even grasp, what it is like to be on a budget for individuals and families. 'What's a few cents if gas at the pump rises?  They just do not get the uproar.

Such governance by rich elitists contains the seed of their own eventual destruction and will eventually be brought down by those whose needs are not met, as the rich and a ruling oligarchy become richer and those whose needs are not met become poorer. A lot of time and pain have to flow under the bridge before it dawns on the masses. It certainly happened to Viktor Orban in Hungary, as popular resentment of his oligarchical and corrupt rule resulted in economic pain. It became so strong that the masses of ordinary people overcame even Orban's suppression of the free press and political gerrymandering and took to a whisper campaign, quiet organizing, and the ballot box. Orban was defeated.

A few MAGA-ers have awakened to this challenge against their own interests. It is close to how the Trump administration is operating now, a rule by the rich, characterized by those techbro s who sat directly behind Trump when he put his hands on the bible for his second term. Trump's lust for respect by accumulating power and wealth is similar to the tech bros' goals. That is Trump's peer group, only he adds just the Mar-a-Lago type, very wealthy, who never have to worry about a budget, and Putin, rumored to be the richest one in the world, who he is influenced by and influences a loyalist group of oligarchs, too. 

Why do most MAGA turn a blind eye to Trump's peer group oligarchy and his attempt to Orbanize America? They shouldn't, logic dictates. What MAGA and liberals have in common is the ability to rise up through democratically protected peaceful means, such as through the ballot box or peaceful street demonstrations.  Preservation of democracy and a government that rules in the public interest, rather than the elite wealthy, should be and are common values, even if they are not yet realized or under threat. So what else is driving much of the MAGA if not economic populism?

I have a theory based on some observations: There is another streak of populism: racist populism. I suspect it is more powerful than economic populism in deep red states.  It has been characterized by Trump's appointment of white nationalists in key administrative positions and their obsession with the destruction of DEI, the continued use of racist dog whistles, and the reaction to the recent Supreme Court decision that gutted the civil rights era Voting Rights Act. This decision, pronounced with the piety of promoting fair elections by negating protections against racial gerrymandering, has accomplished the opposite. This decision instead is opening the floodgates to racial gerrymandering as Louisiana now works to eliminate Congressional districts represented by African Americans.  Now, under the cover of the SCOTUS decision, the former slave states' white-dominated legislatures rush to redistrict before and even during the campaigns for November 2026 and 2028. The estimated result is 22 African American congresspeople losing their seats while claiming racism has nothing to do with these actions. How stupid or naive do they think Americans are? 

 Those who get it and and agree with the hidden messages in the dog whistles and racist redistricting remain quiet or find some other reason to support the racist intent of their representative in state legislators. They are, in a way, part of a populist movement. They show their consent by remaining quiet or voting for redistricting that is geared to remove as many African Americans from Congress as they can. while still voicing support for their white legislators. Racism as an openly touted value is still politically incorrect, but winks and nods masked in a variety of dog whistles are right there up front, conveying it in other ways. Their silence is deafening. and actions speak louder than words. Silence says as much as anything. Silence is a form of consent.

What are dog whistles? a simple explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8_fgJQHkOc.   

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/state-redistricting-battles-intensify-following-u-s-supreme-court-ruling-on-voting-rights-act

https://apnews.com/article/trump-inauguration-tech-billionaires-zuckerberg-musk-wealth-0896bfc3f50d941d62cebc3074267ecd

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/02/white-christian-nationalism-has-taken.h

All politics is local, so national views on gerrymandering I have seen do not differentiate views based on race, but on politics.  Nonetheless, here are nationwide views. In short, most people are not well informed even on political gerrymanders.  https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/52740-large-majorities-americans-say-gerrymandering-major-problem-unfair-should-be-illegal-redistricting-texas-california-poll  

How Democrats get their messaging muddled

If I were writing stump speeches or had to find a way to get the best and strongest message across in an ad, here is how I would do it,

 Democrats have a way of messing up messaging by getting it backward and muddying the message. They put the cause before the effect. That requires too much deductive reasoning on the part of audiences. .  They also put " attack " terms in 3-syllable words, but not the way ordinary people speak.  Ideas: replace "retribution" with the word  "revenge" and "accountability 'with   "Hold X responsible for......".

Next: speak in short staccato bullet points, no more than four with examples and zingers

 1. Here's the pain you feel (i.e., cost, chaos and corruption...He gets rich, and you get poorer with crypto and tax, and administrative favors to loylaists). Reset it.  Problem with getting rich on foreign investments: he who pays the fiddler calls the tune, if not now, sooner or later. Emoluments clause in the Constitution  broken by Trump

 2. Why does Trump do it and how?  (amass power and wealth for himself; ignores laws or stretches them to the breaking point. ) Lame duck so does need to be responsive to voters and has immunity from prosecution.

3, Your MAGA opponent is an enabler.  Loyalty first to Trump, even when it hurts our constituents..so rubber-stamp and present examples, of course, gas prices and Iran, but so much more.

 4. What plans I propose to fix it (reform gerrymandering, getting rid of Citizens United, and stop dark money etc,, returning the Department of Justice to the purpose of law enforcement and not revenge against pllitical enemises etc, beefing up Obamacare), Democrats cannot just run on "I am not Trump" alone.I fear Democrats can get hung up on their own revenge crusade.

.

Trump's belief he can ignore bad poll numbers just got a boost from the Supreme Court

How can Trump ignore his plunging polls? In his ego-driven arrogance, he thinks he can control the outcome of the 2026 midterms and ignore popular sentiment. or even their vote count. Yesterday's Supreme Court decision is one of its many contributions to Trump's arrogance. (The others: Citizens United and presidential immunity from criminal prosecution) Plunging polls mean little to the officeholder who will not be a candidate in the next election...and Trump is a lame duck, free to feather his own nest while he can.

While piously claiming the decision that racial gerrymandering was a no-no, the Roberts court majority granted a victory to white southerners who objected to too much power being given to African Americans in drawing election districts. The current makeup results in 1/3 of the seats likely to vote for African American representatives, the same percentage of African Americans of the entire state, 30%. SCOTUS just okayed giving all seats except one to white-dominated voters, depriving the 30% of full representation in Congress. In short it was ok to give the white folks a disproportionate advantage, but not ok for the Black folks to get a fair share. ..if I understand the math ok. The effect of the decision couched in deceptive terms of fairness was to gut a main provision of a civil rights constitutional amendment, which would prevent racial gerrymandering resulting in racial discrimination in the first place. https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/scotus-smothers-voting-rights-act-greenlighting-racial-discrimination-and-a-rash-of-gop-gerrymanders/ It now opens the door to other white-dominated southern states to do the same now and in the future in order to limit a proportional representation of their population.

Trump has plans to overturn the anticipated losses in the midterms and the will of the majority of the people. He is using the tools of gerrymandering, like this on race, seizing control of states' voting lists to target and suppress anticipated voters, grabbing vote machinethat tabulate the ballots, and using ICE paramilitary dressed for war in Afghanistan to frighten off brown people from voting at polling places in person, while eliminating mail-in voting by executive order..(A fool's errand given the Constitution that gives states such control). The Supreme Court yesterday gave the green light for racial gerrymandering, undermining a major thrust of the civil rights movement and, in the long term, attempting to suppress African Americans' ability to elect representatives. who support their interests.

The Roberts Court's contribution to Trump's arrogance is now furthered, yesterday, adding to the past rulings, with a gift of immunity from criminal prosecution to Trump, and its Citizens United decision permitting dark money to be contributed to candidates, opening the floodgates to epic corruption to influence government policies favoring them, and candidate corruption by secret corporate donations. Yesterday's blow was one more nail in the coffin of voters' power to shape their destiny, the essence of a democracy. 

No, DJT, Ukraine has not lost militarily. . You have outsmarted yourself..

 I just heard Trump claim "Ukraine has been militarily defeated, " just as he claimed Iran has been defeated. https://www.bbc.com/news/war-in-ukraine . No,. Trump's lying. Note: Later,Trump said he mispoke; he was referring to Iran, not Ukraine. However, Trump has been saying that Ukraine is losing the war all along, from the Oval Office, that Ukraine did not have the cards to play as recently as December 2025 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwL2ooeUsR8

The Ukraine war is a slog with the front going back and forth with victories and retreats measured in kilometers. Drones are not so secret Ukrainian weapons, and recently, Ukraine has used them to attack Russian military infrastructure, causing Putin to fear an attack enough to call off a parade to celebrate the Russian defeat of the Nazis.

DJT, both Ian and Ukraine have outsmarted you.

Iran has just demonstrated that strategy beats bombs, tanks, and missiles, and boots on the ground.. Trump failed to secure Hormuz first, and now Iran has the world by its control of a great percentage of its energy supply.

When it comes to Ukraine, superior technology and strategy overcome the superior manpower of the Russian effort, and now Russia is running out of recruits to feed their cannon fodder advantage.

This is in spite of Trump's constant sabotage of Ukraine's efforts, which is not very subtle:

.- his failure to even release aid to Ukraine, voted on by Congress, -his undermining of ATO,
-his miscalculating the extent to which Germany and Europe would up their military commitment to see Russia in Ukraine as a threat to them,
-his counting on the recently defeated Hungary's Orban, also a Putin ally, to keep European funding for Ukraine bottled up,
-his echo and wink to his buddy Putin in negotiations..all have failed to stop Ukraine from stopping Russia, and the war advantage now counts in numbers, one or two kilometers.

-Trump, above all also failed to anticipate the technological talent of Ukrainians themselves to manufacture drones, thus changing modern warfare, while defending against drones. made in Iran.

All of the above measures that Trump has tried have not been enough to influence Ukraine's resistance to Russian aggression. As AnneApplebaum of The Atlantic magazine has been noting since December 2025, because Europe has stepped up and because Ukraine no longer depends on US aid, America has lost the ability to influence the war's outcome and is therefore becoming irrelevant. If this is true, Trump outsmarted himself by challenging Europe to fund the Ukraine efforts, and when they did, he lost control of the situation.

-A recent column in the New York Times by David French must have rankled him. The French call Zelensky the leader of the free world as well as changing the battlefield with their new, innovative technology.

it

In the broader sense of what has happened, Trump has laid bare the weakness of his America First policy, of shedding alliances and going it alone. If successful. America is not first; it is irrelevant. That takes us back to the late 1930's when America Firsters became very powerful in keeping us from getting involved in Hitler's aggression in Europe. How did that turn out,

Trump's whining about Europe not helping to open Hormuz is political BS

 Trump's attempt to pass off blame for the Gulf of Hormuz is still closed on Europe's failure to come to his aid, and for good reason. Aside from the barrage of insults and dissing NATO hurled at our former allies in Europe, Trump is out to fool the US public as well. Trump claims Europe is so dependent on oil and gas shipped through the Gulf of Hormuz that it is in their interests to come to the US aid in freeing  Hormuz, which the US  action had caused  it be closed. by Iranian retaliation. Trump's BS wants Americans to ignore some facts: Only 4% of Europe's oil comes through Homuz, and less than 10% of liquid natural gas.  Europe's reduced reliance on fossil fuels has lessened over the years as its reliance on wind and solar has increased. 50% of Europe's energy comes from wind and solar.

  https://www.iea.org/about/oil-security-and-emergency-response/strait-of-hormuz  

https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/share-of-energy-consumption-from

So, how is Europe compensating for even the loss of this amount? It is importing more from the US. It would do more, but Europe right now is turned off from doing business with the US and Donald Trump, not only for his solo Iran blunder, but also for the tariffs and the US refusal to help Ukraine. and the arrogant attacks on Europe and NATO itself. US business interests are finding themselves persona non grata in Europe. There is no more goodwill advantage.   https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/dec/04/europeans-trump-enemy-of-europe-russia-war-poll

All of us,  Europe and the US, are paying high prices because the price per barrel is based on international supply and set by the cartels, but so long as the availability of the quantity of fossil fuels is not critical to Europe, Europe is finding ways to deal with the costs. Trump's failure to do likewise is causing a political blowback as seen in the polls, as he's getting the blame for the price of gas at the pump.

Answering questions that never were asked in the past: what'wrong with high costs, chaos, corruption, cruelty, and no compassion

 

What is wrong with the high cost of living, chaos, corruption, and cruelty? This is the kind of question I never had to ask in my lifetime, or for that matter, found so many who do not care enough about the answers, and out of fear or loyalty remain silent.. The challenge for the political opposition is to remind them of why those things are bad and how they hurt even the ones Trump says he loves. 

Let me add one more C to the alliterated attack list: Constitutional crisis:   The fruits of his power grab are high living costs, chaos, corruption, and cruelty. Trump has distorted, exceeded,  worked around, and abused the use of the powers granted him in the Constitution whenever he can. The rule of law is mocked to its demise. Trump's modus when constrained by a law he does not like is to ignore it, break it, test it, and hope that, in six months, a friendly judge does not tell him no.

Incompetence and no compassion are other descriptive words we rarely applied to past presidents, but the Iran Hormuz screw-up is due to Trump's incompetence to anticipate fallout and his lack of compassion about affordability concerns (even mocking the word), and warehousing migrants in gulags without access to legal help is another.

 So what is wrong with the high cost of living? It is not fair to those struggling to balance their personal budgets now, while he and his cronies are living their gilded lives.

So what is wrong with the chaos?  Planning for survival on one day, whether you are in business or struggling with your budget, or worried about personal or national safety, may be obsolete the next. Trust in the leader's judgment or motivation, or trust in his good word, is gone. 

 So what's wrong with corruption?  Problem with getting rich on foreign investments: he who pays the fiddler calls the tune, if not now, sooner or later. The Emoluments Clause in the Constitution is constantly broken by Trump, who is enriching himself and his family on real estate and crypto schemes with investments from foreign governments. Aside from the moral and legal questions, the problem with corruption is that what motivates the great leader's decisions may benefit him and his family's wealth and power, but may harm those he governs who are not among the beneficiaries of his public policies.  

So what is wrong with cruelty, and is the use and threat of it quite OK? The fear of its use keeps the disloyal in line and deters others from doing what is not in their own interests. Using the DOJ to launch investigations on political enemies is a cruel misuse of power and true treatment of migrants in hopes all of one race will self-deport, whether or not they otherwise had any civil rights.

So what about a Constitutional crisis? Trump has been able to strike fear and demand loyalty to him by ignoring the rule of law and the Constitutional constraints because of a cowed Congress, a staff and cabinet of yes men, and his core MAGA base. The only constraints so far are a slow-acting judiciary and some justices who comply with his anti-democracy instincts. He thinks he can ignore the poll because 1) he has gotten away with acting like a dictator and thinking he is one, 2) the ability to use force, ICE, and seizure of voting rolls and election machinery to avoid an election loss at the November midterms and beyond.   For that reason, a a 60% disapproval of his policies is of no concern.  In any case, to him, this democracy is of, by , and for Trump and those who keep him in power. If you commit a crime on his behalf, he'll just pardon you.

 https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/04/messaging-again-democrats-may-be-onto.html

Two recent setbacks to Trump's foreign policy mean America's weaker and not so great agai's an

Two recent setbacks to Trump's foreign policy mean America is weaker and not so great again. It has weakened this country's ability to shape its own destiny. No greater evidence of this is Trump's failure to get more than one country to support his Iran war, and his influence to support Orban was more of a kiss of death than help to Russia. With these two setbacks, Trumpo shows he has lost control and influence to get European support for his Iran war.  Orban's loss in Hungary frees up billions for Europe to boost Ukraine's self-defense from Trump's pal, Putin's aggression.

Both signal the real meaning of Trump's hostility to Europe and NATO? As he complains, Europe does not jump to his tune anymore, he has failed to realize that the real result of his actions, insults, and refusal to honor the essence of NATO...mutual defense, he has lost control and influence over their policies.. Not only is America First now America alone, but it is also "America Too Weak" to influence its own destiny. Trump went after NATO again April 17: https://weartv.com/news/nation-world/trump-slams-nato-they-were-absolutely-useless-with-strait-of-hormuz-support-iran-war-conflict-attacks-united-states-military-troops

The Wall Street Journal reports Europe is planning to use the NATO military structure for its own defense if the US pulls out.  https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/europe-nato-trump-plans-3a423233

With Orban's huge defeat in Hungary, billions of European funds will be unblocked for Ukraine's defense.  The unifying chant by the citizens who engineered his ouster:"  Russia out".     It was like Minneapolis shouting ICE out.  Recently, chats between Orban and Russia's foreign minister revealed how closely Orban and Russia were in cahoots.        Viktor Orbán had been blocking a $105 billion of  EU loan package for Ukraine.  No doubt Putin will try to strangle Hungary's access to Russian energy, but the fear of that did not deter the citizens' revolt that ousted Orban. Europe's task is now to offset that loss of Russian oil and gas despite the pipeline configuration that favored Russia.

Messaging again: Democrats may be onto something: "costs, chaos corruption"

 I am not sure who to attribute it to, but  I think it is Roy Cooper, former NC governor, running to the Senate, who used a slogan  I think is potentially as powerful as what Mamdani coined, "affordability," to become the Mayor of New York. It is "cost, chaos, corruption". All of those three words relate to issues that are bothering the other 60%, not in MAGA's 40% camp, and maybe even a few of them, as well.  Each one of those words is a catchy heading for sub-issues, rich fodder for attack campaign speeches by opponents. Those three words permit Democrats to do what they so often fail to do: find slogans that stick to even the most casual person interested in voting, or even staying home.  Some other "c" words out there are "crazy" and " incompetent".

"Costs" is like "affordability," and right now, it is low-hanging fruit from health care costs, groceries, gas, and utilities, and inflation. Some of those will persist into November, no matter how the Iran conflict turns out. Trump is placing priorities into his blunders over Iran, advocating Medicare to be stuck to the states because war financing is more important, and the price of gas at the pump, or other challenges to a struggling middle class.  So much could be resolved by reversing the tax breaks to the rich, but those seem sacred to Trump and are never, ever offered as an alternative. If voters want to fund both their treasured federal social safety nets and military adventures, why not start there?  Fiscal conservativism means balancing expenses with the other side of the column, providing offsetting tax income, right? 

Chaos refers to the personality of Trump and his enablers, especially those up for election in Congress.. His egomaniacal personality is the only constant. He seems to mean whatever is good for Trump is good for the nation for the moment. It seems temporary, confusing, and raises fears about an unstable future.. That is not making those who feel vulnerable feel secure about financial planning, immigrant worries, and damage to civil rights, not to mention his foreign wars, Iran, Greenland, and Cuba. TACO Trump is more than just a description; it is a condition of his instability. More and more, he appears to be nutty, jumping from position to position, insensitive to all human and US security's adverse fallouts. Our allies no longer take his word, whatever it is today or yesterday, seriously. Sometimes they see it as dangerous. So much depends on what Trump tweeted overnight. The rule of law used to be a standard that provided some element of stability if everyone respected and abided by it, but Trump blatantly ignores it, leaving it up to what he thought was the loyal judicial bench to back him up months later, counting on them to give him a permission slip. That is a large contributor to his reign of chaos.

"Corruption" is not just about bribery:  It is a matter of favoring the rich with favors and tax policy to keep them in the political fold...domestic or foreign, and it is all in the open: accumulation of wealth and power by Trump and his family and those whose favor he tries to influence. Conflicts of interest or appearances of conflicts of interest seem of no concern to the Trump family or himself. He has monetized the Oval Office...and the wealth he has accumulated for himself, his families, and cronies is obscene.  His crypto adventures raise suspicions that padding his pockets influences so many of his other public and foreign policies and potential conflicts of interest. Even if there is no proof of direct bribery, it is worthy of outrage on its own merits, especially when America's middle class is blaming Trump for their increases in the costs of living. Trump himself has seen his net worth jump $1.4 billion to $ 3 billion in the last year, per Forbes, through crypto ($500 million), licensing deals, and the release from pending lawsuits.  Total gains last year for the Trump family in the billions.: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/tracking-the-trump-familys-business-deals-and-profits-in-his-2nd-term. Most of the investments in Trump family businesses come from the Middle East.

Crazy is another attribute that was once disguised in other words,  but his very erratic behavior and his propensity to build monuments to himself in his egomania. is now called out openly. There are other words used by psychologists, but for the vernacular, crazy and egomania will do.  His judgment is shaped by his personality challenges and traits, dominated by revenge against his enemies and by his personal interest in accumulating wealth and power.

And to stretch the alliteration a bit, inCompetence to execute on his campaign promises, to lower prices to consumers, and his blunder in the Iran war, and failure to anticipate the Hormuz Strait closing.

"(If Cooper came up with the phrase, there is some irony here since those three words were once used unsuccessfully by the GOP to attack him years ago. There needs to be substance and an already accepted voter approval and polling agreement among supporters to make it work. However, Trump is well underwater in so may of these public policy issues

Heads up, pro Democracy forces in November 2026: Gabbard, DHS/ICE/Trump have other plans taking shape now

There are fears that Tulsi Gabbard is laying the groundwork to turn the Trump regime into a mass Tina  Peters, to seize voting machines based on the fantasy that Trump lost the 2020 elections because of fraud that has never been proven by any evidence.  Heads up for November..  This is part of a larger concerted attempt by Trump et all to try to scew with the results in the November midterms. It is a plot to destroy the integrity of the election by a variety of means.  The pattern is clear; the intent is now obvious.

 2026. https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/04/tina-peterswill-get-shot-at-reducing.html

https://www.ms.now/news/gabbard-revives-deep-state-conspiracy-claims-alarming-democrats-who-see-a-pattern: 

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/06/gabbard-trump-election-midterms-voting-integrity-00769768

This is in addition to the Trump regime's efforts to ban mail-in ballots and get a nationwide voter lists with important information that would help target voter suppression efforts... which Colorado leaders are also taking action against. https://www.denver7.com/news/local-news/colorado-attorney-general-phil-weiser-to-sue-over-trumps-executive-order-restricting-mail-in-voting

Nationwide: in addition to Gabbard's threats, another arm of Homeland Security has plans still not totally denied to place ICE armed and masked thugs at polling places to cut down on brown people voting against them.   This is more than an attempt to use the pretext of the 2020 election steal due to unproven fraud, but it is an effort to frighten away even brown citizens with proof of citizenship from voting. Now, wondervoting by mail is being opposed by Trump because if voters can avoid voting in person for fear of racial profiling and implied harassment, they can still vote by mail.  As one commenter to my recent blog posting wrote so very simply and so very clearly:"Because it;s America.  I'm a citizen and it's wrong to be intimidated by armed people as  I vote, also non-whites are going to get harassed ".

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/03/save-us-from-save-act.html

Exposing corruption is not enough; voters need to understand how corruption affects their lives

This is a messaging challenge for those hoping to change the Trump regime in November 2026 and 2028.  Exposing corruption is not enough; voters need to understand how corruption affects their lives. The demise of Viktor Orban was brought about because voters understood that his corruption had made them the poorest country in the European Union.  So many in the US complain about the price of gas at the pump, and they see the connection with world-set oil prices and the impact on supply, and I understand this is about a war Trump started with Iran.  Some excuse Trump for getting rich while president because he is such a great businessman they so admire, but they are beginning to understand how his corrupt practices drive up grocery and agricultural prices and inflation.  To fund it, Trump proposes cuts to feed the hungry programs and making health care unaffordable for even more voters.  The Iran war is an easy connection to make to rising prices, but what does corruption have to do with it?  

 PBS and AP, in a lengthy analysis, show how the Trump family's cryptocurrency ventures are connected and how the prospect of war and foreign policy initiatives shape investment decisions. and the pockets of Trump and his family.  That's the problem: it is lengthy and requires a grasp of such new instruments of wealth like cryptocurrency and gifts from airplanes to the advantage of  managing sovereign Saudi funds

.The Trump family's current wealth has much to do with their self-interested conduct of foreign affairs, but the challenge is getting this into a form that lay people can understand and make the link to their own well-being.  Bribery is not always obvious when there is a quid pro quo.  The quid may be separated by months from the quo...or involve what seem to be unrelated business transactions that just happen to result in stuffing the pockets of schemers at both ends of a corrupt deal.   This is worth a serious read: 

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/how-the-trump-familys-business-deals-could-open-the-door-for-future-presidents-to-profit-from-office?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

 

Orban's defeat is a win for US pro Democracy movements

There are lessons to be learned, but Orban's defeat is a boost to pro-democracy movements and inspires efforts underway in the US to restore the kind of democracy we once had.

After  16 years, the people of Hungary had had enough of autocracy.  It took 16 years for the grassroots to get around Viktor Orban's total control of the media and a pro-Russian foreign policy.   What does this mean for America's resistance to a political party and MAGA's attempt to establish a unitary form of government to replace the Constitutional constraints against an all-powerful executive branch chief? 

There are some lessons to learn from Hungary's experience.  So enamored has MAGA been of the "strong leader"  unitary model for political domination that the powerful Conservative Political Action PAC (CPAC) has held meetings in Hungary, and Orban has been a featured speaker at their conventions. Much of the thrust of an Orban-type autocracy was also part of the plan to de facto turn the US into their one-party rule by a concerted effort to replace the federal government's rank and file with loyalists to Trump,  white Christian ideologues, and wealthy cronies..They succeeded without rewriting the Constitution by putting the authors and advocates of Project  2025 in charge of personnel and appointments and in the White House staff itself with the election of Trump in 2024 to a second term..  

The Achilles heel of autocracies is corruption. Rule by one person or a small group enables corruption because it removes checks on the avarice, greed, and pocket-stuffing of the rich and fawning supporters and cronies.  Such political and governmental power in one hand enables a leader to neglect the financial well-being of even those they purport to support. It is felt by the masses when the autocrat has priorities other than those he governs, from concerns about the cost of living to the negative impact on their own lives of foreign military adventurism, or being aligned with another similar autocracy, like Putin's. Hungary's standard of living, once comfortable, had declined under Orban, making it one of the poorest countries in Europe.   Overt and unchecked corruption had become the signature of the Orban regime. https://www.princetonpoliticalreview.org/international-news/viktor-orbns-hungary-corruption-repression-amp-democratic-backsliding.  This may also sound familiar to observers of Trump 1 and II.

 It is emerging as an awareness in the US of it happening here, to some extent. But there is also a growing realization that autocrats think they can get away with ignoring promises to make life more affordable, as their leaders feather their own nests with wealth and power. This awareness is reflected in plunging approval ratings for Trump and his unpopular public policies.  

The link of who controls the power, the people or an autocrat who is self-promoting and self-indulging, is this: Autocracy enables the needs of the rank and file citizens to be ignored. Trump is acting like one who assumes he has already seized the reins of the federal government and he can get away with anything, including enriching himself and his family members while using his power to punish and suppress any opposition.  

The good news coming from Hungary for those who want to restore the power. of Congress and bolster the judiciary to check the corrupt and vengeful can inspire the grassroots and populace to rise up without violence and restore the democratic antidote. Hungary just did it. It just takes a long time for it to happen; 16 years in Hungary.(In America, the time frame has been more like a year or two for CPAC and Project 2025 to establish an Orban-type rule.) For Hungarians,  it took a grassroots, door-to-door effort by a nation that once was  prosperous and had seen its standard of living decline as the corruption of the rulers became more evident despite media control. 

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/02/russell-vought-and-trump-pulling.htmlcontrol.  It was a merging of an Individual NO KINGS-type movement and the organization of citizens through word of mouth and door-to-door. 

We have a template for similar revolts in the US. It was Minneapolis and a citizens' revolt against ICE. The citizens were inspired to act as they did because it was not just an argument over legal theory but a revolt against the methods ICE used that trampled on the human and civil rights of all immigrants. and thenselves.  It was a matter of moral outrage and the unfairness of the treatment of all residents, regardless of race, religion, or immigration status. Its citizens had had enough of the fascist type paramilitary actions of ICE and organized in many ways, using many techniques to be successful.

 What is also evident with Orban's defeat is that it is easier to nip a wannabe autocracy in the bud before it seizes more control of the reins of government, because once in control, it is much harder to effect regime change. It takes time and mass realizations by citizens that they have been played.

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2025/12/list-or-particulars-how-trump-has.html.  How Trump has accumulated dictatorial powers in 11 months

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/02/russell-vought-and-trump-   How Project 2025 now runs the executive branch

Exploring CPAC's love affair with Viktor Orban https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2025/09/the-orban-playbook-and-if-it-would-work.html

   

A historical classic conflict: morality of the pope vs immorality of Trump: update 4/15/26

JD Vance, newly minted Catholic, spoke to a youth group this weekend and basically told the Pope to sit down, shut up, stay in his lane, and just preach the gospels. Perhaps we can forgive Trump for being immoral and only transactional without any moral compass, because there is evidence he has a hard time comprehending the written word, so he probably never read the 
Bible and he does not grasp the meaning of Christianity.  He just demonstrated that with the blasphemous posing of a picture of him dressed like Jesus, laying hands on a sick person. Trump has no clue.  But Vance? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/14/jd-vance-defends-trump-pope-leo-spat

We need more morality in governance, not less.

Here is the problem: the last guy to try that was Hitler, who made the deal with the Pope.  Stay in your lane, too, and you will just be fine.  Some clerics had other thoughts. Thousands of priests and protestant clerics met death in Dachau. Since World War II and the Atomic bomb, and the Nuremberg trialsg trials, there has been an attempt to bring minimal morality into political and military practices through the Geneva Conventions and the establishment of international tribunals in order to try and imprison those found guilty of war crimes as defined by international law.

That, too, has been trashed by Pete Hegseth (also a professed Christian), who finds rules of engagement "stupid" and igniting conflict within the military over whether they should obey an illegal order.  Note: those orders considered illegal were directly the result of the fallout of Hitler/World War II, and the Nuremberg Laws. Those subalterns to Hitler who tried to claim they were just following orders were either hanged or imprisoned as a way to teach the civilized world that such actions were no longer acceptable.

 This world desperately needs more morality as a standard in practice, even in politics and governance, not less. Many in the grassroots are opposing Trump's policies,, motivated by moral outrage, over whether it is starting a war or ICE snatching people and throwing them into prisons with no opportunity to make their case in court. Morality has come into conflict with abuse of legal intent of  laws in the Trump era. Contrary to the Constitution and any sense of morality, the detainees are being kept in gulag warehouses where inhumane treatment will cause the detainee to self-deport, whether they had a right to stay in the US or not. Cruelty is not a Christian value, nor is the mass slaughter of civilians in war. It is also considered a war crime even to threaten it in order to force capitulation.

Continuing with the original post

The Pope openly rebuked Trump, and called off trips to the US as the battle between morality vs immorality comes out in the open.  , prompted by Trump's threats to wipe out a whole civilization to get the Gulf of Horuz open, Trump got closed. Pope Leo vows now not to visit the US while Trump is president per reports early 4/9/2026, https://www.thenational.scot/news/26006429.pope-leo-refuses-go-us-donald-trump-president/   Also, a factor, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth threatened the Pope; https://newrepublic.com/post/208820/pentagon-threatened-pope-criticized-donald-trump. Trump did TACO, a "cease fire," and negotiations have begun, but demands on both sides are so far apart, the prospect of this is iffy.  It is an off-ramp for Trump's blunders, causing strategic failures and blowbacks, even if the military executed target orders brilliantly.

 This is only part of the Pope's condemnation of Trump's policies. The dispute had already become public over Trump's inhumane treatment of migrants in  Milwaukee. https://www.milwaukeeindependent.com/explainers/faith-action-milwaukee-churches-confront-human-toll-immigration-policy/

https://www.dbu.edu/mitchell/medieval-resources/medpapalimperialconflict.html

The same moral outrage is appearing in protestant Texas over the treatment of immigrants in the rise of Talarico.  https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/03/james-talaricos-victory-in-texas.html   Talarico is a Presbyterian theologian student.

https://baptistnews.com/article/its-pete-hegseths-theology-that-ought-to-concern-us

Post World War II attempts to codify what constitutes acceptable behavior by warring factions also reflect a level of morality generally supported by international law.  It is expressed in what is considered as a war crime, worthy of criminal prosecution in international tribunals, and was the outgrowth of the Nuremberg trials that sent a large number of Nazi leadership to the gallows or to prison. Trump may have backed off his threat of genocide and wiping out a whole civilization in Iran because someone whispered in his ear that what he threatened was a war crime in itself, but for sure if he carried it off with a bombing campaign  Trump may think he can commit war crimes in the US and get away with it because the Supreme Court granted him immunity, but the Hague can still bring him to justice and trial if a warrant for his arrest is issued.  FYI: the rest of the Trump administration, from cabinet members to military brass, are not protected from criminal prosecution in the US and in the Hague.  Particularly at risk is Secretary of "War", Pete Hegseth, who calls the Geneva Conventions and other laws and military rules of engagement that keep military actions that protect innocent civilians as "stupid". https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/03/02/us-defense-secretarys-media-remarks-on-rules-of-engagement# 

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/04/trump-advocating-war-crime-t-when-hague.html

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/03/iran-hegseths-holy-war.html

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/02/moral-indignation-rises-as-major.html

Hegseth is not the only cabinet member or major policy shaper in the White House. In fact, Trump has handed much power to White Christian Nationalists who see the future of America in racial terms and draw on their religion to justify their intent. The gospels are dominated by taking care of the least of these and how to treat "strangers", completely contradicting the intent of Jesus as he is reported to speak .https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/02/white-christian-nationalism-has-taken.html

Update 4/1//2026:  Why is Trump so immoral? 

Trump has a personality problem. Why does Trump keep making bad judgment calls like the Iran war and adding costs of daily living to so many in America, while enriching the already rich with taxes and public policy favors? I keep searching for answers. Here is what I conclude. It is based on observations of what he does as much as what he says with bluff, puffery, and lies. It is more than just Trump being Trump. He has his standards, and doing moral things is not his goal or his own measure of success. Being "transactional" means making deals that benefit himself. It is not what is moral or good for even his supporters. It's not what is legal or Constitutional. Trump has always been that way, but now it seems in his second term, his personality quirks are on steroids. Trump is consumed wth amassing wealth and power for himself in the short time he has left in office. He is stuffing his pockets with crypto and building monuments to himself, from ballrooms to soaring arches, his name on currency and concert halls, his face frowning down on citizens from public buildings, and throwing his military muscle around. Everything else is secondary as he makes Trump great again after his loss in 2020. That is the problem with having an egomaniac, self-aggrandizing president. Those with bad judgment are his enablers who think that what is good for Trump is good for the rest of America and their very own lives.

And now Trump and Vance support and provide active support to a dictator, described by some as a neo fascist.

This is  an update of a Feb. 18 post:

4/9/26 And then Trump and Vance left no doubt that they not only endorsed Oban, but actively came to his aid as polls show he may lose the election this coming Sunday. Orban now enjoys the support of Putin and Trump...all the "best"people. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/watch-live-vance-speaks-in-hungary-on-trip-to-help-boost-orbans-reelection-bid

Rubio boosts Orbán's bid for another term during Budapest visit | PBS News

Viktor Orban has been described by many sources as a dictator and a neo fascist and has been held up as a darling by US right-wing conservatives (CPAC).

He also favors Putin's foreign policy, particularly as it pertains to Ukraine. Fellow European NATO members find him constantly out of step with their attempts to help Ukraine, and often have to use /workarounds to carve out their support for Ukraine. That Rubio would be endorsing him says much about Trump's love of dictators, a role his words and deeds reveal he aspires to join them, as well. As a Cuban-American, one would think Rubio understands why dictatorships are bad. I do not get him other than he has hitched his political ambitions wagon to Trump..

MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: The Orban playbook and if it would work here

In her 2018 book Fascism: A Warning, former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright identified Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán as a leader exhibiting authoritarian, fascist-like tendencies. She categorized his actions—such as undermining the press, judiciary, and minorities—as part of a broader trend of anti-democratic behavior. 

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/watch-live-vance-speaks-in-hungary-on-trip-to-help-boost-orbans-reelection-bid

Trump advocating a war crime when the Hague has already charged both Netanyahu and Hamas with war crimes

Today we can breathe a sigh of temporary relief. Trump TACO'd over his threat to commit genocide on Iran (the threat itself is a potential war crime) and ordered a two-week pause in bombings for negotiations. Whether he was influenced by the public reminder that he would be carrying out what was considered a war crime by the International Court of Justice in The Hague is not known. However, he would have been at risk of joining some recent additions to the Hague legal actions: Both Netanyahu of Israel and Hamas leaders have been charged by the Hague for war crimes in the Gaza conflict, and warrants are out for their arrest. Both of the charged parties fear traveling to any country other than friendly ones, where they could be arrested and sent to the Hague for trial.  

https://www.icccpi.int/defendant/netanyahu#:~:text=About%20Defendant,at%20least%2020%20May%202024.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/international-criminal-court-seeks-war-crimes-charges-for-israeli-and-hamas-leaders   

Tina Peters...will get a shot at reducing her jail time, though the conviction stands; update 4/16/2026

Update 4/1/6/2026  For how the Tina Peters story fits into the geater plans of the Trump regime to destroy the November 2026 midterm elecitons, go to https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/04/heads-up-pro-democracy-forces-in.html

Continuing wth the original post:

Tina Peters will get a shot at reducing her jail time, though the conviction stands.  The trial was fair and the conviction was fair, but the sentence needs review.The judge rules that her sentence does deserve a second look on the basis that her freedom of speech was impaired, but we will not know the outcome for at least 42 more days. Per NPR " So, the three options are, in 42 days if nobody appeals, Judge Barrett will do the resentencing. If somebody appeals, there’s a short period for the Supreme Court to decide if they're going to hear the case. If the answer is no, it will be sent to Judge Barrett for resentencing. If the answer is yes, we'll need to wait to hear what the Supreme Court says and they might come to a different conclusion than the Court of Appeals but we might not know that for maybe a year to a year-and-a-half.:" https://www.cpr.org/2026/04/03/district-attorney-dan-rubinstein-tina-peters-resentencing/

What Peters did was not only destroy the integrity of the count in a ruby red county because she took seriously instructions from Trump to "secure the ballots",. She then violated state ballot security rules and laws.  She secured them for sure, but she secured them for unauthorized Trump partisans and then engaged in a cover-up.  Trump has made her the martyr on behalf of his anti-voter access campaign based upon the "stop the steal" continuous lies about the 2020 campaign in order to justify his "SAVE" legislation, which will seriously restrict the ability of many to vote in the November midterms.  Trump tried to pardon her, but he could not since Peters was convicted under Colorado state laws, not federal ones, and Trump only has jurisdiction over federal convictions.  Instead, Trump engaged in a pressure campaign against Colorado, removing federal installations, federal assistance to social programs, and other attacks, putting pressure on Governor Polis to overturn her conviction or mitigate her sentence. Polis is now off the hook with this ruling. This court ruling upheld her conviction and that she had a fair trial, but did allow for a review of her sentence based upon the violation of her free speech rights.

The first amendment issue is whether the 9-year sentence was based on muzzling her advocacy post being removed from her position, or on other justifications, i.e., to prevent future clerks from doing what she did. The conviction was not overturned; only the issue is that her sentencing was affected

.https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/03/gov-polis-do-not-commute-tina-peters.html

If a migrant is undocumented, is it a crime or a civil offinse: It depends.

If a migrant is picked up by ICE and put into detention for just having no documents, is it a criminal matter? Is it a misdemeanor?  It depends.  It appears that ICE will just sbatch and grab those that fit their racial, speech, and acts as suspicious, ignore the legalities, and put them in a gulag, letting them sort themselves out.  That is a catch-22 because it will take a lawyer to do ti, or even a court hearing, and often detainees do not have access to them when they are in the gulag. 

How many migrants have been arriested by ICE and how many had criminal "histories" and how many did not?https://www.npr.org/2025/12/10/nx-s1-5637397/about-a-third-of-people-arrested-by-ice-had-no-criminal-record-new-data-shows.   176K did not...average 405 per day since Jan. 20, 2025. ..had no record of breaking any criminal law.

The hearing is a civil procedure.  Migrants have the right to an attorney and a hearing, but they have to pay for their own attorneys. If they have no one on the outside helping them, or can even make contact with someone, in effect, they are out of luck. 

The reference I used was this:  https://factually.co/fact-checks/justice/is-being-an-illegal-immigrant-civil-or-criminal-offense-824718.   A misdemeanor or a civil case depends on the action of the migrant involved and there is a federal statute governing this.  This is why a migrant in an ICE gulag needs access to an attorney and a hearing before a judge...which are being denied them unless outside sources intervene or provide one. 

The hearing is a c The ivil procedure.  Migrants have the right to an attorney and a hearing, but they have to pay for their own attorneys. If they have no one on the outside helping them, or can even make contact with someone, in effect, they are out of luck. 

Bondi being fired is not surprising: she lost in court cases and bungled Epstein

 Pam Bondi being fired is not surprising: she lost many court cases and bungled the Epstein files.She was in an impossible spot...either be successful with frivolous lawsuits or lose her law license. She chose the former, but she still got ousted, because she failed.. She fumbled the Epstein files either with incompetence or too obvious an attempt to cover up. What Trump wanted her and demanded she do was act as his terrible swift sword of non-evidenced prosecutions (really persecutions of political and policy opponents), which also put her license in jeopardy. It was like Rudi, who lost his license, for his acts in 2020...as did a bunch of other stop the steal loyalists..Trump may have inadvertently done her a favor by removing her. Trump will get no further with a successor who tries this same stunt before judges, too. 

  https://www.npr.org/2026/04/02/g-s1-115077/trump-bondi-attorney-general-departure

Is Trump's management style: more like a King or more like a mob boss?

 What is Donald Trump's management style? More like a wannabe dictator or king or more like a mob boss? Either way, corruption is part of it.  He has made billiions using his power as president.  https://www.newyorker.com/news/a-reporter-at-large/trumps-profiteering-hits-four-billion-dollars

My take:  Trump's management style is based on corruption, more like a mob boss than a King, and both can be true at the same time... only corruption and pocket padding have marked much of Trump's second term.

This got me thinking: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/02/corruption-trump-administration/681794/?utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share.In this February 24, 2025, opinion piece in the Atlantic, the writer Jonathan Rauch argued that there was a fancy word for what Trump really personifies. It is patrimonialism,  another word for a mob boss. Trump uses his power to make himself, his family, and his loyal followers rich.  What Rauch describes is padding the pockets of his family and loyalists.  Trump favors loyalists, I note, who have substance and power of their own to benefit him.  Pocetk padding is one aspect, and it appears to be his motivation for some of his actions, including paving the way through regulatory agencies to give legality to his crypto ventures and business dealings like those of his son-in-law, Jared Kushner.

Another characteristic of a mob boss is punishing those who are "disloyal" or defy him. He does it by abusing his powers to "take revenge and retribution ", and carries it out, instructing and/or approving, or empowering his lieutenants in his cabinet and powerful regulatory government positions to take action using methods that courts later consider illegal or unconstitutional. Those actions inflict pain, financial and public pillorying,  until some judicial branch stops it months later, and those judicial chickens are just coming home to roost. Even "his" Supreme Court is putting on the brakes, though most of the action is still at the lower federal court level. Trump,  like a good mob boss, expects those he appoints to be loyal to him and not to the Constitution. April 1, 2026, he sat glaring in the Supreme Court chambers listening to the arguments near and dear to his heart, denial of birthright citizenship, as if to remind the justices to be loyal to him.  After all, he appointed so many of them.  It appeared to be an act of intimidation, if not just to give support to far-right, racist, white nationalist dreams. No president in US history had sat to hear the Supreme Court's argumentation on an issue until this. 

Recent examples of this include unjustified legal action by the DOJ or threatening the political future of those in GOP-favoring gerrymandered districts.  It does not mean doing what is in the reason for his election, such as reducing the cost of living and ending wars abroad.

I cannot help but think that a role model for a mob boss was best described in "The Godfather". Another description of how Trump operates was written by his former "fixer", Michael Cohen, Disloyal: A Memoir: The True Story of the Former Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump  (2020). Cohen may be embittered, but the book is instructive. One of Cohen's contributions to understanding Trump is that Trump never gives a direct order, but drops enough hints about what he wants done,

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/03/semantics-for-masses-grifter-for.html

What's the difference between celebrating independence on NO KINGS 3/28 and on July 4? Not much

 What's the difference between celebrating No KINGS and on July 4? I saw an objection to No King's Day...we already celebrate it on July 4th. Obviously, some still do not get it, or else they are just being cute or trolling instead of being ignorant. Here is why we should also celebrate July 4th, in addition to the 8 million-plus who got it on March 28. Believe me, it is one more opportunity to make a point on July 4th. For the ignorant, not for the MAGA trollers, a reminder, here is to remember the reason why we declared independence: No tyrannical kings, and to get out from almost exactly what angered us about what the King did,(Bill of Particulars in the Declaration), which are mostly now enshrined in the Bill of Rights. We also rose up in 1776 because of one issue that resonates today: taxation without representation.

Trump thinks he's a dictator, acts like one, and ignores laws and Constitutional provisions he does not like, treating executive orders like a law, making up his own laws as he will, punishing those who do not support him with retaliatory action by the DOJ and threats of being primaried. Dictators are the modern version of a tyrannical king, and every day he violates those First Amendment rights, particularly press freedom and civil rights of individuals and the 4th amendments. Pro democracy, the protection of the Constitution, and the spirit of 1776 are inseparable.

The other reason for independence was that we were being taxed without representation...another provision enshrined in the Constitution, to make sure we, the people, would control taxation and its use through Congress, especially the House. Trump cowed the House into a bunch of yes people (whatever Trump wants, Congress gives him), whether with tariffs or the cost of war. Now, he wants to make it more difficult for voters to cast their vote, particularly old people, brown people, and women. FYI, we celebrate the freedom our forefathers fought for, now in jeopardy, too, on July 4

The patriots who were the founders of the Constitution and our form of governance sought to preserve our right to govern ourselves, to preserve all who were created equally inalienable rights to pursue happiness, and to keep us from a tyrannical ruler, making those governing subject to the rule of law instead of the rule of an individual. Those who experienced the revolution in 1776 were also given the opportunity to write the Constitution which was approved in 1787. Aside from limiting the power of tyrants with checks and balances of three power centers, legislative, judicial, and executive, they added more safeguards to protect the power of individuals to protest peacefully per the Bill of Rights. They attempted to tackle some of the trickiest problems of governance in the Constitution and in both the amendments and in the regulated election process. How do you provide a peaceful transition of power while still allowing an outlet for the masses to express themselves and let off steam peacefully? They gave those who lost the election the protections and ability through the Bill of Rights to convince a majority of voters that those governing need to be replaced by the ballot box and not by a bloody revolt. 

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2025/07/my-declaration-of-independence-from.html

What's different about the No Kings protests March 28, 2026

What I saw in the TV coverage left me with the impression that not only were the numbers higher than in the prior No Kings, but that there was greater diversity in age and race, with handheld posters and banners supporting a wider range of public policy issues than we saw in the initial protest events. The difference now is that political science theory has met negative impact on people's lives after a year of Trump's second term. Trump has managed to anger more people in one year. Experience is always the best teacher. More are learning the lesson that democracy is worth fighting for. It is more than just venting protests: it is indeed solidifying into a pro-democracy movement.

An increasing number and wider variety of voters now get that without democracy, their own desires will be ignored and their voices will be suppressed, even if their views are supported by more than a 58-60% majority.  Trump, in his delusions of unbridled power, has ignored many, reneging on promises he made, from affordability to avoiding foreign wars. Furthermore, he and his appointees have been acting with cruelty and armed force, while he has been using fear with his tools of abuse of power to enact revenge and retribution. Patriotism to him is loyalty to him, and he acts like it, using vengeance, abusing power, using it against those who oppose him, suppressing their voices in the media, and limiting voting access. in some ways, he resembles more of a mob boss padding his and his family's pockets than a mad  king. https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/04/is-trumps-management-style-more-like.html.   Either way it is anti-democracy with similar repercussions.

Trump, the wannabe dictator,  has confused loyalty to Trump with loyalty to America. In his view, if you are not loyal to him, you are un-American. They are not the same: loyalty to Trump is not loyalty to the oath taken by public officials and military to be loyal to the Constitution and a government of, by, and for the people that respects and abides by the rule of law.  If what Trump wants to do runs afoul of the laws conforming to the intent of the Constitution, he ignores them, defies them, or finds a workaround to what was the original intent. No staff person, no GOP-dominated legislature, stops him. He condemns judges, even those he appointed, who dare rule against his interests, subjecting them to violence and threats of violence by Trump partisans. His plunging polls do not bother him; he has his priorities (him) and they are not the voters or the members of his own party or as it will be played out in the midterms. Perhaps this has something to do with the fact he is a lame duck and has come to personal grips that we will not run again in 2028.  Unlike his first term, he towed the normal lines of behavior more closely, but he knew he had to face voters again.  

By refusing to bow down to fear, over eight million responded on March 28, feeling safe in numbers nationwide by putting their bodies on the line in dispersed masses, appearing with joy, sometimes humor, and ridicule. This has become a pro-democracy movement under the unifying umbrella and realization that, without democracy, those with their own agendas and priorities would be ground in the dust by an overpowering, out-of-control, mad King wannabe dictator acting as if he were already one.

The reaction by MAGA is mostly ignoring this pro-democracy movement. They do it at their own peril, and the polls are reflecting that. We are no longer a 50-50 divided nation.  We are near 60-40.  https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/03/we-are-non-longer-nation-that-is.html.  

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/03/29/no-kings-rallies-a-red-flare-for-trump/89306058007/

Hegseth and Trump threaten war crimes in Iran. See them in the Hague someday?

 Update: 4/4/2026 Recently, Pete Hegseth prayed for violence. He is the same one who called the rules of engagement, such as the Geneva Convention, "stupid" and would ignore them. Now there are reports per MSNOW that his threat to bomb Iran's civilian infrastructure has earned the DOD the nickname, by some Marines in the Pentagon as the Department of War Crimes. FYI, Trump echoing Hegseth and Hegseth, calling international law stupid, but thinking you can avoid repercussions for committing war crimes in the future, are two different things.:" Rep. Seth Moulton, a Marine combat veteran.t Bombing civilian infrastructure like electrical generation and desalination plants, as Trump and Hegseth threaten, is intentionally committing war crimes because they target civilians. https://www.facebook.com/reallyamerican/posts/breaking-rep-seth-moulton-says-troops-are-calling-hegseths-pentagon-the-departme/1428246449343821/

This is why Trump tried to prosecute/persecute those 6 Congresspeople who dared to remind the rank and file that they do not have to follow illegal orders. So far, no troops have acted on their rights ..but so far, other than the school children bombing (intent may have been based on bad, non-updated intelligence)., we have only the threat to do so and public admission that the administration knows bombing civilian power generation and desalination plants is illegal. After all, they howled when Putin threatened the Ukrainian nuclear power generation facilities. However, acting lawlessly is part and parcel of the rogue, out-of-control Trump presidency, and Trump, thinking he is already a dictator, believes he can get away with any crimes. If the Trump cabinet members or general staff commit war crimes, they are not protected by the Supreme Court's granting Trump immunity. If Trump and his lieutenants somehow end up in the Hague, criminal intent would not be hard to prove... since their words are already a matter of public record.    

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/rep-crow-signals-legal-action-after-administrations-effort-to-indict-6-democrats

https://www.military.com/feature/2026/03/05/hegseths-stupid-rules-of-engagement-line-and-what-roe-actually-do.html

Continuing with the original post:

The stupid rules of war came into being after World War II in response to the atrocities committed against civilians. Nuremberg and the Hague tribunals have hung or imprisoned many; most recently, the Hague was active, spurred by the ethnic cleansing of the Balkan wars of the 1990's. I have never heard of a public official with great power at the onset of any war anywhere advocating war crimes by prayer until Hegseth implied it. He is a religious fanatic and a throwback to the Middle Ages and the Crusades. Then Trump chimed in.

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/.../iran-hegseths....

He fancies himself as the Dark Ages crusader who wears the Crusader cross on his chest and sees himself in a holy war as a follower of a church that believes in violence to advance their religion. Hegseth is a member of the worst extreme sect of the Christian religion.

Prayed Hegseth:“Let every round find its mark against the enemies of righteousness and our great nation. Give them wisdom in every decision, endurance for the trial ahead, unbreakable unity, and overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”

See you at the Hague someday if you act this out in Iran.

Then, to compound this, Donald Trump echoed that he would knowingly commit war crimes by destroying Iran's power plants hat keep

civilians afloat and alive. He is still threatening to do it in 10 days. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/03/trump-warning-attack-iran-power-plants-is-threat-to-commit-war-crimes/

Rep. Seth Moulton, a Marine combat veteran, told MSNBC that active-duty Marines have started calling Hegseth's Pentagon the "Department of War Crimes." The reason, according to Moulton, is simple: the administration's decision to target Iranian civilian energy infrastructure, which Moulton flatly called a war crime. "It's meant to hurt civilians," he said.

This is why Trump tried to prosecute/persecute those 6 Congresspeople who dared to remind the rank and file that they do not have to follow illegal orders. So far, no troops have acted on their rights ..but so far, other than the school children bombing (intent may have been based on bad, non-updated intelligence)., we have only the threat to do so and public admission that the administration knows bombing civilian power generation is illegal. After all, they howled when Putin threatened the Ukrainian nuclear power generation facilities. However, acting lawlessly is part and parcel of the rogue, out-of-control Trump presidency, and Trump, thinking he is already a dictator, believes he can get away with any crimes. If the Trump cabinet members or general staff commit war crimes, they are not protected by the Supreme Court's granting Trump immunity. If Trump and his lieutenants somehow end up in the Hague, criminal intent would not be hard to prove... since their words are already a matter of public record.

See you in the Hague, DJT, if you carry that one out..

Geneva Conventions per Google AIThe Geneva Conventions are a set of four international treaties (1949) and three additional protocols that form the cornerstone of international humanitarian law. They establish legal standards for humanitarian treatment during war, protecting people not taking part in fighting (civilians, medics) and those who can no longer fight (wounded, prisoners of war). 

The Four Geneva Conventions of 1949:

• First Convention: Protects wounded and sick soldiers on land during war.
• Second Convention: Protects wounded, sick, and shipwrecked military personnel at sea.
• Third Convention: Applies to prisoners of war (POWs), requiring humane treatment, adequate food, and medical care
  .
Fourth Convention: Protects civilians, including those in occupied territories. 

Key Principles and Scope:

• Universal Ratification: All 196 states have ratified the 1949 conventions, making them universally binding.
• Common Article 3: Applies to non-international armed conflicts (civil wars), ensuring minimum protections.
• Core Protections: Prohibits torture, murder, cruel treatment, and outrages upon personal dignity.
• Protection of Medical Facilities: Medical personnel, units, and transport must be respected and protected.
• Additional Protocols: 1977 and 2005 protocols added protections for victims of both international and non-international conflicts. 

The conventions are overseen by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and aim to limit the barbarity of war. 

• What Are Geneva Conventions And War Crimes - video Dailymotion

  The Geneva Conventions are a set of four formal treaties signed in 1949 after World War II to cover the basic dignity and protecti...

  

  Dailymotion·India Today

  

  2m
• The Geneva Conventions and their Commentaries - ICRC

  The 1949 Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols are international treaties that contain the most important rules limiti...

  

  ICRC

  
• Geneva Conventions - Wikipedia

  Aside from the UN Charter, the Geneva Conventions are among the most widely ratified international agreements. The 1949 convention...

  

  Wikipedia

  

Show all