Friday, November 8, 2019

Impeachment going public: fasten seatbelts for a wild ride

A version of this was published in the Winter Park Times
https://winterparktimes.com/opinion/columnists/fasten-your-seatbelts-its-going-to-be-a-wild-ride/
Beginning this week Republicans get their wish to bring to TV the impeachment inquiry testimony of witnesses who earlier made depositions behind closed doors. Fasten your seatbelts. It is going to be a wild ride. We will now have a chance to look at the witnesses in their faces and hear what they saw and knew. We, too, will have a chance to hear Trump's defenders cross-examine. Failing to knock holes in witnesses' testimony, watch them try to get your attention focused on some side issues not directly relevant to the core events driving the accusations. Expect witnesses to be subject to character assassination and accused of some presumed bias. Per Socrates:” When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers.”


For those who still have not made up their minds in advance, this is an opportunity to sit as if you are a juror in a grand jury. While the impeachment process will be voted upon by our elected representatives in the Senate and the House, they too will be following public opinion polls closely and may be swayed by them. A nationwide poll by USC reported Nov 7 by the Los Angeles Times concluded that one-fourth of Americans have not made up their minds; 44% already support impeachment and 30% oppose impeachment.
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2019-11-07/usc-la-times-november-poll

Transcripts of those depositions and responses to cross-examination questions by the GOP are being or have already been released, but some are 300 pages long. Given a nation so attuned to the visuals and audios of television, and not disposed to delving into wonky weeds of the written word, the impact of the TV hearings will go far to determine national sentiment. The open testimony will be reported and spun by cable media outlets that are slanted ideologically to the left or right. Excerpts and sound bites chosen by the media outlets will be very influential in shaping opinions. Most will probably hear or see broadcasts of the evening news and will not be glued to C-Span or in-depth coverage provided by cable outlets. Social media will be on fire with truths and untruths.

Bet every dime you have that the real-time defense rebuttal will come from the mouths, tweets, and interviews of Donald Trump and his supporters. There will be many attempts as well to shift your attention to someone else’s accused wrongdoing , proven or not. Donald Trump himself is already putting the blame for the scheme to force the Ukraine president to find dirt on the Bidens on his chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, political donor and Trump loyalist Ambassador Sondland, and his personal attorney Rudy Guiliani. Groundwork and action occurred months before and after a July 25 telephone call in which Trump himself told the Ukraine president the favors he wanted and conditioned military aid and a White House visit on Ukraine's president complying. Trump may not have used the term "quid pro quo", but what he said described bribery and extortion. Just asking a foreign leader to help in an election is also a crime under election laws.

Here is where we are now. We are still in the inquiry (investigation) stage. Since no special counsel conducted the investigation in advance and made a report as happened in the Clinton/Nixon cases, this current inquiry is more similar to a grand jury action conducted in secret to determine if the prosecution has a case and what charges are appropriate. Unlike the usual grand jury procedure, open hearings in the House beginning this week will allow cross-examinations and representations by attorneys. Defense witnesses can be called with the approval of a majority of committee members. The Constitution limits reasons (articles) to treason, bribery (extortion falls into this definition), and high crimes/misdemeanors that are not defined. Abuse of power has fit into this latter category of articles in prior impeachment endeavors. A court finding of guilty of a crime is not required. The House’s impeachment vote does not determine guilt or innocence. That trial will happen in the Senate.


What will be the impact on the 2020 election cycle is unknown at this stage, assuming the President is acquitted in a Senate trial as is likely and will not be removed before the 2020 November election. A conviction in the Senate requires a two-thirds vote and given the makeup in the Senate, all Democrats and twenty Republicans would be needed to remove him. Impeachment in the House needs a simple majority that Democrats comfortably have. This will be the fourth impeachment process in 250 years, two of which ( Bill Clinton/Andrew Johnson) made it to the Senate for trial, and both ended in acquittal. Nixon resigned before any vote. By November 2020 other issues may be considered more important to voters such as health care, economy, women’s choice, and gun safety.

Note: not allowing attorneys into closed-door depositions is a rule imposed on the House by the GOP during Benghazi hearings. https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/trump-rages-about-impeachment-twitter-he-has-republicans-blame-rules-ncna1078921

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/11/trump-impeachment-explainer-069321


Tuesday, November 5, 2019

What really counts in 2020: Are you better off since Trump became president

 This Financial Times poll likely is the most important one to watch during the 2020 election cycle. Ronald Reagan's famous: "are you better off today than...." is extremely important. Trump will try to convince voters they are better off and scare voters to thinking they would be worse off under the Democratic candidate, but with only a roughly 1/3 of voters believing they are better off since Trump took office, the GOP is starting with a handicap. The impact of the impeachment action is yet to be seen and may not, in the long run, but it could the determining factors, contributing to the disgust and character turnoffs of Trump.  The Senate trial began with those wanting Trump removed at 51%. in national public polls. The key is in 6 battleground states which is what counts in the electoral college. One advantage in getting impeachment out of the way before 2020 begins in earnest is for Democrats to go for the President's weakness: he wants to make those in the battleground states worse off by repealing affordable healthcare insurance for the lower middle class, tie them and their children to the millstone of student debt, note the Trump administration is wedded to big pharmaceuticals' high costs and removing coverage of pre-existing conditions. They should take a page from their 2018 win and go about showing suburban women how Trump is not in their court, including supreme court choices who want to turn back the clock to a time before Roe v Wade.  Pocketbook issues that count can be added to the "disgust" factor" with Trump's character in a way that may offset his followers devoted to his anti-immigrant and racist stance in the exact swing states he must win in order to win in the electoral college. Remember: national polls are a mirage. Democrats usually win those, but only what counts will be the electoral college vote based on individual states.

From the Hill posting: "The Financial Times-Peterson poll released in November found that almost two-thirds of Americans said their finances haven’t gotten better since Trump has taken office.
"Thirty-one percent of respondents in the new poll said their finances have gotten worse since Trump won the White House, while 33 percent said their finances haven’t gotten better or worse in the same time frame.
"Just over one-third, 35 percent, of respondents did say they have seen a positive change in their finances since Trump took office.
"Of those who said their financial situation has worsened since Trump took office, 36 percent said their wages are to blame, while 19 percent blamed their personal or family debts."
The poll also showed an even split amongst likely voters over whether Trump’s policies help or hurt the U.S. economy. Forty-five percent of those polled said they believe Trump's policies have improved the economy, while another 45 percent said they’ve worsened the economy." https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/468802-majority-says-they-are-not-better-off-under-trump-poll
That is an interesting contradiction.  Even some of those who do not see they are better off or are worse off under Trump still think Trump's policies have improved the economy.  Politicians who think that voters are only interested in their own financial situation will vote on behalf of their own self-centered interest may overlook the optimism of hope, that others are benefitting and they may too, sometime.  That is the value of full employment, some income security even if they get laid off.  The downside to that is that they may have to take a cut in wages or income and they know that even wages are beginning to increase and minimum wage laws are gaining popularity.  What that may mean for Democrats is that their candidate should not threaten economic trends that they like, and still make their economic lives better.

 While the progressive left talks about how they would make their lives better, the cost of their proposals and shaking root and branch of the economic system with increasing debt, there is an uneasiness within those with hope and feeling positive about their gains will be threatened.  They want both: the gains and the betterment.  That may explain why Biden and Bloomberg are showing polling strength, Warren has faded, and Sanders appears peaked with a set number of dedicated supporters. It is a balancing act and many know it. They are asking themselves do they want to take risks or be cautious.

___________________________________________________________________
Obama warning: do not go too far left
https://www.yahoo.com/news/too-far-left-candidates-dont-165007808.html
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/10/why-donald-trumps-economic-dream-crumbled/601153/?fbclid=IwAR3f7LNdzag1ecMEe5xl9l4seyCYMM-41KZQxKyZltTOamlcbTL9N5yvC3gThe U.S. manufacturing sector is practically in a recession. The ISM index, a key measure of that industry’s health, registered its lowest number in 10 years. Real exports of goods and services have declined in the past year, after peaking in 2018. Mining jobs have declined in the past 12 months, too. Finally, hovering in the background behind declining investment, sputtering manufacturing, and wilting exports is the trade war with China, which has proved neither “good” nor “easy” for American 


businesses.

Monday, November 4, 2019

Impeachment inquiry deposition transcripts links testimony

Update 12/3/219
Report of House Intelligence Committee to the Judiciary Committee
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/read-full-text-trump-ukraine-impeachment-inquiry-report-n1095036?fbclid=IwAR0Ai0u_wVnUX_YDwkpZFF8qd92E7a5S3c_cIlMOkbt35YDedvF9lMx2C7M

11/21/2019

Fiona Hill calls conspiracy theory Ukraine not Russia interfered in the 2016 elections
Furthermore, Russia NSC expert, Fiona Hill, calls the claim that Ukraine, not Russia, invented and advanced by Russia. It is fiction.


11/20/19  Sondland opening statement
https://news.yahoo.com/gordon-sondland-impeachment-hearing-opening-statement-152521608.html?ncid=facebook_yahoonewsf_akfmevaatca

U Tube Col Vindman's open testimony and Ms Williams
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1f_Xw0vcTU&feature=push-fr&attr_tag=Ce5VleJhlFLgHI-c%3A6

Vareity of U Tubes of testimonies through Nov 19
https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/politics/100000006834102/impeachment-inquiry-vindman-applause.html


Volker and Morrison testimony Nov 19 synopsis:https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/19/impeachment-inquiry-vindman-williams-volker-morrision-testify/4231559002/

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/impeachment-hearing-11-19-19/index.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/04/us/politics/house-intelligence-committee-transcripts-released.html?action=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype=Article

https://www.youtube.com/watch…Democratic questions at Col. Vindman's testomony 11/19/19

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/11/05/bombshell-reversal-earlier-testimony-sondland-confirms-knowledge-quid-pro-quo
Sondland

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kurt-volker-transcript-read-full-text-testimony-trump-impeachment-inquiry-live-updates-2019-11-05/
volke

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kurt-volker-transcript-read-full-text-testimony-trump-impeachment-inquiry-live-updates-2019-11-05/
Volker

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ulWTJUQsVY&feature=push-sd&attr_tag=I7mZwbj6niEp38Fn%3A6
Open committee testimony of Amb Taylor,  George Kent  11/13/-19

Amb. Marie Yovanovitch testimony in open committee hearings 11/15/19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ulWTJUQsVY&feature=push-sd&attr_tag=I7mZwbj6niEp38Fn%3A6

https://www.axios.com/read-transcripts-tim-morrison-jennifer-williams-impeachment-4a869e68-78d2-48c4-ba83-69fd84731be2.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1f_Xw0vcTU&feature=push-fr&attr_tag=Ce5VleJhlFLgHI-c%3A6     4 testifiers on 11/19/19   Vindman, Volker, Morrison, williams

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/18/politics/david-hale-holmes-transcripts-released/index.html
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/471028-read-closed-door-testimony-of-state-department-official-david-holmes

We have a republic: will we keep it?

A version of this was published in the Winter Park Times, Nov. 8, 2019

Update Nov. 12, 2019
"It is easy to destroy an organization if you have no appreciation for what makes that organization great. We are not the most powerful nation in the world because of our aircraft carriers, our economy, or our seat at the United Nations Security Council. We are the most powerful nation in the world because we try to be the good guys. We are the most powerful nation in the world because our ideals of universal freedom and equality have been backed up by our belief that we were champions of justice, the protectors of the less fortunate.
But, if we don’t care about our values, if we don’t care about duty and honor, if we don’t help the weak and stand up against oppression and injustice — what will happen to the Kurds, the Iraqis, the Afghans, the Syrians, the Rohingyas, the South Sudanese and the millions of people under the boot of tyranny or left abandoned by their failing states?
If our promises are meaningless, how will our allies ever trust us? If we can’t have faith in our nation’s principles, why would the men and women of this nation join the military? And if they don’t join, who will protect us? If we are not the champions of the good and the right, then who will follow us? And if no one follows us — where will the world end up?
President Trump seems to believe that these qualities are unimportant or show weakness. He is wrong. These are the virtues that have sustained this nation for the past 243 years. If we hope to continue to lead the world and inspire a new generation of young men and women to our cause, then we must embrace these values now more than ever."






If we let President Donald Trump off the hook for misusing the power of his office for his own political benefit we could cause the eventual end of our democracy. There are those who will say what he did was wrong, but it was not wrong enough to justify impeachment or removal by the Senate. Consider this. How Congress acts will create a precedent for some future wannabe dictators from the left or from the right who think they too can get away with it. Many democracies in our modern era have died a creeping death because citizens allowed their constitutions and laws to be abused. Our founders feared the rule of a tyrant (king, dictator or autocrat) would reoccur. They had fought a revolutionary war to rid themselves of one. They wrote safeguards into the Constitution. If those safeguards are ignored, wrongdoings go unpunished, or unexposed, there is a likelihood that sometime in our future we could see our democracy replaced by an autocrat getting away with ignoring laws and the Constitution as Trump did. It is not only about members of Congress who fear being primaried or concerned with their reputation in history. It is also about the future of the kind of governance our children and grandchildren will have. Frequently quoted Ben Franklin on the passage of the Constitution: “We have a republic if we can keep it”. American democracy is being tested.
Important guardrails protecting us from the demise of democracy are written into our Constitution: the separation of the three co-equal branches of government and their ability to have specified kinds of checks over one another. A major difference between a dictatorship and a democracy is that the rule of law trumps the rule of a person in a democracy. In a dictatorship, the autocratic leader tells you what the laws are or mean and persecute you for not adhering or daring to protest. Impeachment by Congress is one of the Constitution's checks against this happening. Important witnesses have braved repercussions to their own futures to provide confirmation of evidence already public in the record of a telephone call between President Trump and the President of Ukraine, and slips of the tongue of officials. Corroborating evidence is emerging from the behind doors inquiry that Trump used the powers of his office to get help from a foreign government for his 2020 re-election bid. The impeachment inquiry is now moving into the light of public hearings and voters will have a chance to see and hear for themselves if this is a sham, an unfair process, and a partisan takedown, as Republicans claim.
Charges being investigated by the House are whether the President asked, pressured, or demanded the Ukraine President to help Trump’s re-election. Soliciting, accepting and using aid from foreigners for election purposes is by itself a crime per election laws. Our democracy, our elections, are of, by, and for Americans, not of, by, or for Russia, China, or any other country. In the July 25 telephone call, Trump asked the new Ukrainian president to find dirt on the family of Joe Biden, his most feared opponent in the upcoming 2020 US elections. He further conditioned a visit to the White House and the release of bi-partisan supported military aid Ukraine desperately needed if they agreed to the favors he asked. That phone call described a “quid pro quo”, a Latin phrase, meaning “I will give you something you want (quid), the release of US military aid and a White House visit, though if you do what I want (the quo)’“, and investigate Hunter Biden’s Ukraine business. That kind of bargaining is used to support national security policy’s established objectives, but that is not what this quid pro quo involved. It was to benefit Trump’s re-election. Trump’s defense that the deal was to fight corruption in Ukraine is a farce since any reference to corruption the President made only mentioned Biden’s son’s Ukraine business dealings.

https://www.newsweek.com/federal-judge-slams-trump-attacks-judiciary-1470674