The rule of secular law
As a former county clerk myself, the county
clerk who refused to issue marriage
licenses to same sex couples because it violated her religious beliefs, got me
thinking about the differences between a country ruled by laws that were
secular, not connected
with religious or spiritual matters, and a country ruled by an official state religion. The U.S. is governed
by secular laws.
That issue, secular vs religious rule, dominated debates in American history among and within the colonies, but it became
one of the compromises expressed in the First Amendment when the Constitution was
formulated and ratified. It forbad
Congress from establishing a state religion and protected freedom to practice
one’s own religion.
Our founding fathers
were influenced by their bitter
experience with persecution under the English kings who also served as the
religious rulers by divine right and the
divisive practices of some colonies , such as the Puritans of Massachusetts who
substituted persecution justified by one religious belief with another just as
cruel.
In modern times the issue of separation of church and state
has been the subject of many a US Supreme Court rulings. Sometimes other Constitutional provisions such
as the 14th Amendment that established the right of equal protection
under the law seem to conflict with the First Amendment. The Supreme Court is the arbiter that resolves
those conflicts and they ruled in 2014 that equal protections trumped laws in those states that had passed laws motivated by
religious beliefs of their majority forbidding same sex marriage.
A key to a stable, successful
democracy is a rule of secular law that protects minority interests. Failure to do so has hobbled many wannabe
democracies .The tension within secular states vs Islamist advocates of Sharia
law , the religious laws derived from interpretations of the Koran, have played
out in the Arab Spring . In Egypt ,deposed
President Mubarek’s secular law was replaced by the Muslim Brotherhood’s Sharia
type laws that resulted in persecution of Christians and others, followed by a military coup that re-established secular
law. In Turkey, a government tried to
replace the secular laws of Ataturk
(founder of modern Turkey) with more Islamist ones. The result has been many demonstrations,
bombings and unrest, attempted power grabs, and changes in leadership. The Nobel peace prize was just awarded to a
group in Tunisia who hammered out a compromise between Islamists and secularists,
though the country is still a home to
many Islamic extremists.
Most American elected
and appointed officials swear on a Bible to uphold the laws of the land which
are secular. Kentucky clerk, Kim Davis, refused to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples because
she was
acting because of her religious beliefs that forbad her to do so. Her action resulted in jail time for contempt of
court.
Another Kentucky clerk opined :
" Why take away the majority's right [just] to give the minority their
rights?” Send her back to school for civics lessons. The
First and 14th amendment protects minority rights from being
trampled by the majority , but they are not
enforced under the authority of state sponsored religion but under the
authority of the secular Constitution.
Felicia Muftic served as Denver County Clerk from
1983-1991.
A version of this appeared in the www.skyhidailynews.com October 23, 2015
For sources tapped for the column visit www.mufticforumblog.blogspot.com and also visit the posting: Freedom of religion, a right so often misunderstood
A version of this appeared in the www.skyhidailynews.com October 23, 2015
For sources tapped for the column visit www.mufticforumblog.blogspot.com and also visit the posting: Freedom of religion, a right so often misunderstood
Bowman, Brad (September 2, 2015). "Defiant county clerks standing ground on
gay marriage issue". The State Journal (Frankfort, KY).
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/national/supreme-court-opinion-on-same-sex-marriage/1605/
No comments:
Post a Comment