We have seen enough of the spins and lies lately to see what Trump's spin doctors are trying to do: to get voters not to believe their very eyes. There is a pattern here. There have been so many events late, it it is a pattern of behavior, not just a one-off event. If the pattern is revealed as what it is, the result is that the credibility of even future attempts by the Trump administration to spin bad news by pulling their colored glasses over the eyes of voters will be damaged. The Trump spinners are finding their techniques of "don't believe your eyes" much less effective than in the past, and their opponents have the advantage in this age of everyone having a camera in their cell phones. Videos from multiple angles are readily available. The more the better.
Here are the danger signs that your mind is being twisted to swallow the spin. Immediately, within minutes, without any attempt to investigate first, the spin is out: the agent was always acting in self-defense in the shooting, followed by refusing to let independent agencies or multiple agencies do an investigation. The spin doctors depend on the suppression of evidence to the contrary. They are afraid their cover-up would be exposed, and this itself is a suspicion that they are engaged in a cover-up. Next, if the selected video is shown and edited to support their spin, know that given the same opportunity exists for everyone else in the world to see something quite different, and then give the world the opportunity with eye-opening multi-video opportunities in every media opportunity possible. Third, as the event gets less and less coverage, the propagandists will try to revise history by those whose memories have dimmed. Keep the videos to the contrary shown every time the spin is attempted in the future and never let up doing it whenever the opportunity presents itself. The pattern itself is damning.
Some opportunities to show the pattern of behavior of lies and spins using the "don't believe your very eyes"attempts and put events in context of behavior:
On January 6,the spin: The Trump banner-waving rioters were looky-loos tourists who were not called to be violent that day by the president himself (Jack Smith's detailed findings are to the contrary and demand release of his report. Call it a cover up diverted with personal attacks on Smith). The propagandist response is to bury and rewrite history in words that contradict what we saw with our very eyes or videos of the violence that the stormers of the Capitol committed. In the shooting of Renee Good, show the wheels and back-up lights as she moved away from the threatening ICE agents, and the bullets that riddled her side of the car that killed her is from an agent on the drivers side, not standing in front of it. An agent claiming that she tried to run him down has a hard time showing why he shot her from the side of the car.. In the case of the killing of Alex Pretti, focus on the cell phone in his hands, some 9mm pistol. Show he was pinned to the ground on all fours with no gun in his hand. His legally concealed gun was removed from him, but after that, he was shot multiple times by the agent/killer after he was subdued and the weapon was removed..Timeline: How the Shooting of Alex Jeffrey Pretti Unfolded - The New York Times And do it all over again and again and again as a way to demonstrate a pattern of behavior and destroy the credibility of the Trump spinners.
Sidenote: Some takeaways from the Alex Pretti killing that serve as a warning to protesters: 1) leave your legal conceal and carry weapon at home; you too could be called a domestic terrorist armed and dangerous with an evidenced plan to kill ICE agents 2) wear a covid mask; you are on ICE agents cell phone cameras for future prosecutiion as domestic terrorist. Filming ICE is legal but exposes you to digital tracking – here’s how to minimize the risk
Gen. Mark Hertling, former commander of US troops in Europe, called out ICE for being an uncontrolled milita. He did this morning, 1/26/2026 on Morning Joe.
Hertling and other analysts. In the past heand others have used the term like a "violent militia" or "occupying army". This includes accusations of using excessive force, such as the shooting of a civilian in Minneapolis, which contradicts official reports (per a search on Google AI).
No comments:
Post a Comment