Doing
the same thing and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity, attributed
to many including Ben Franklin and Albert Einstein. So, the neocons want us
to do a repeat of our involvement in the Iraq war and expect the same
results. Yesireee. How do we like that outcome today?
Let us face it: We are and have
been involved in a centuries old Shia v Sunni civil war ,whether we intended to
do so or not. We had cast our lot with
the Shia except when we harnessed a Sunni uprising to win the war against Saddam Hussein . Such religious
based conflicts are far beyond our
control, but we played the factions off to suit our own single
minded determination to find WMD, protect oil interests, or get regime change. Policies set in motion by the Bush
administration and the subsequent Obama administration’s attempt to extricate
ourselves from it have now come to bite US interests in our posterior. The threat
is worse than Saddam ever was.
If we do not repeat the previous Iraq
strategy, what are the alternatives? All
bad. Obama is making some tough decisions and whatever he does will be
criticized. Leaving ISIS (the advancing Al Qaeda extremists) in position to do
us real damage is no option .
Ultra Obama critic Sen. Lindsey Graham(R-SC) called Pres. Obama delusional as he himself skirted a call
to put boots on the ground. Graham deludes himself. Graham on CNN Sunday AM advocated to get involved with Syria, blast ISIS with air power, and get rid of al-Maliki, forcing a new
government to be inclusive, as if ISIS already
at Baghdad’s gate would want to accept a deal while they are ahead..
Iran will likely
enter the civil war because there is an opportunity to realize their long
standing desire to dominate the entire middle east. Graham’s solution? Sit
down and ask Iran pretty please not to take over Iraq. Give me a break. Iran will do what Iran wants. We have few
bargaining chips.
Involvement in Syria? The reason
the US did not intervene fully in Syria was precisely fear our aid would land
in the hands of ISIS, who had hijacked the opposition to Assad
The danger with air intervention
is that ISIS imbeds itself with the local population. One mistake causing civilian
collateral damage and we would turn the
entire Sunni population against the US forever, destroying our ability to make
peace.. The unintentional US air strike killing friendly Afghan troops
this month should be instructive to the starry eyed. .Mistakes will happen.
Short term, there are some steps
that make sense: turn Baghdad into a fortress as Iran and the Kurds get involved, pretty please or not. It may be a risk we have to take. Long term,
ISIS could overplay its hand, imposing extreme Sharia law on a culture whose traditions
are so secular.
The very best outcome could be a long,
bloody stalemate, or even a fear of it , that could motivate a political settlement. One was first proposed by then Senator Joseph Biden in 2007: partition the warring groups in a federal
system, similar to the Bosnia solution.
This column was published 6/15/14. Thomas Friedman's NYT column 6/18/14 takes his thinking in the same direction.http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/18/opinion/thomas-friedman-the-conundrum-of-a-unified-iraq-and-a-unified-syria. What is discouraging is that Bosnia has not yet gotten so desperate, it has unified in spirit, though in name it is still one country. Bosnia, too, was ruled 500 years by the Ottomans and then governed after two world wars by Tito, a dictator, whose death left a vacuum, followed by the bloodiest conflict in Europe since WWII, that was only ended by NATO intervention and the Dayton Accord, that divided Bosnia into 3 ethnic states with a federal government, now corrupt, gridlocked, and ineffective. As imperfect as it is, it is better than the alternative of continued bloodshed..
A version of this post appeared in all editions of the www.skyjhidailynews.com June 20, 2014
This column was published 6/15/14. Thomas Friedman's NYT column 6/18/14 takes his thinking in the same direction.http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/18/opinion/thomas-friedman-the-conundrum-of-a-unified-iraq-and-a-unified-syria. What is discouraging is that Bosnia has not yet gotten so desperate, it has unified in spirit, though in name it is still one country. Bosnia, too, was ruled 500 years by the Ottomans and then governed after two world wars by Tito, a dictator, whose death left a vacuum, followed by the bloodiest conflict in Europe since WWII, that was only ended by NATO intervention and the Dayton Accord, that divided Bosnia into 3 ethnic states with a federal government, now corrupt, gridlocked, and ineffective. As imperfect as it is, it is better than the alternative of continued bloodshed..
A version of this post appeared in all editions of the www.skyjhidailynews.com June 20, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment