Showing posts with label Harris. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Harris. Show all posts

Monday, September 30, 2024

From a one time Reagan Republican: Disillusionment and a plea for normalcy and sanity

From my son, a one-time Reagan Republican's Facebook post to me: Disillusionment and a plea for sanity and normalcy.


As we approach the election, I’ve been paying close attention to polling. There’s always one question I find particularly fascinating: "Do you think the country is on the right or wrong track?" Overwhelmingly, the answer is that the country is on the wrong track. There's little context behind this, but the response is so lopsided that it must include voters from the left, right, and center. From this, I can only conclude that most Americans are angry, concerned, frustrated, and worried about the country’s direction. Count me as one of them.

 

There was a time when I thought I understood what the majority of Americans believed. Maybe I was wrong—misguided, living in an "elite" bubble, believing my own nonsense, holding onto a fantasy about our country that was unrealistic, impractical, and naïve.

 

I once believed it was impossible for someone twice impeached, a convicted felon, found liable for sexual assault, a serial bankrupt, facing multiple federal indictments, and guilty in civil court of fraudulent business practices—someone who organized and abetted an attack on the U.S. Capitol to overturn our democratic processes—could ever come close to holding the office of the presidency again. I was wrong.

 

I believed America would never abandon the post–World War II order that, through our leadership, brought unprecedented prosperity, peace, and scientific development. I thought most Americans wanted to stand firmly with our democratic allies to oppose territorial conquest, a practice that had caused centuries of conflict. I believed we wouldn’t back down to autocratic bullies or yield to their ambitions and nuclear blackmail. I thought most of us understood that appeasement only offers a temporary peace before autocrats’ reckless desires needed to be fed again, leading to another global catastrophe. I was wrong.

 

I believed that those aspiring to sit on the highest court in the land were of the highest moral character, with integrity and impartiality. I expected them to resist the corrupting influences of money, power, and ambition. I thought they understood that secret, unlimited money in politics is corrosive, and that the rule of law applies to everyone, including the president. I believed they had the wisdom not to reopen old wounds over women’s rights, civil rights, and voting rights. I also believed our elected leaders, responsible for appointing these justices, acted with purpose to keep the Supreme Court above the fray of petty politics. I was wrong.

 

I believed that the men and women who put on a uniform to serve this country should be respected and honored, especially those putting themselves in harm’s way.  I thought it would be impossible for someone who denigrated this service, exploited it cynically for political gain, mocked POWs, called those who has paid the ultimate price “losers” and “suckers”, and was repulsed by the sight of the wounded, could ever be close to serving as Commander-in-chief again.  I was wrong.

 

As the son of an immigrant, I believed immigration was a fundamental part of the American story. I thought that those who played by the rules, worked hard, and contributed, regardless of their background, should be respected and celebrated. I believed most Americans agreed and that even those attempting to enter illegally deserved humane treatment because, at our core, we are a decent and humane people. I thought even suggesting the use of military or police to round up and detain families en masse for forced deportations would disqualify anyone from public office. I was wrong.

 

I believed that any child from a middle, or lower-class background, with talent, ambition, and hard work, could succeed because America provided a fair and level playing field with educational and economic opportunities for all. I was wrong.

 

I once believed my colleagues would put the good of the country ahead of their personal tax benefits. I was wrong. It seems some people enjoy paying a lower tax rate than their secretaries.

 

I used to believe all these things. Now, I’m not sure what to believe anymore. Maybe that’s the point.

 

To summarize an idea from Hannah Arendt, a German historian and philosopher of the last century:

 

This constant lying is not aimed at making people believe a lie, but at ensuring that no one believes anything anymore. A people who can no longer distinguish between truth and lies cannot distinguish between right and wrong. And such people, deprived of the power to think and judge, are, without knowing or willing it, completely subjected to the rules of lies. With such people, you can do whatever you want.

 

I don’t know if our country is changed forever. I doubt the country I grew up in will ever return, but I hope we find enough compromise so that, when my time comes, it will resemble enough of the place I chose to remember.

 

I’ll be voting for a strange coalition—one that includes Bernie Sanders and Dick Cheney. I’ll be voting for Harris-Walz. I’m not trying to convince anyone else to do the same; I just want four years of some semblance of sanity and normalcy. I was comfortable in my bubble.


 

  

Sunday, September 29, 2024

Nutty and diversionary:"Biden caused Russia's invasion of Ukraine" and Vance proposes appeaseming Putin

Nutty and diversionary:"Biden caused Russia's invasion of Ukraine" and Vance proposes appeasing Putin

Expect Ukraine to be on the table in the upcoming VP candidate debate. JD Vance has been laying the groundwork for his Sudetenland-like peace plan for Ukraine. " During an interview on the Shawn Ryan Show podcast on September 11, Vance said, "Ukraine retains its independent sovereignty, Russia gets the guarantee of neutrality from Ukraine—it doesn't join NATO, it doesn't join some of these allied institutions. That is what the deal is ultimately going to look something like." Zelensky bit back: go read the history of World War II and appeasement. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jd-vanc or your favorite news source, you may be reposting Russian disinformation or believing it. For those who do not trust our own government on this matter, here it is a warning from the government of Canada. Countering disinformation with facts - Russian invasion of Ukraine

Updates: n 

Vance is considered the leader of the America First movement, advocating isolatiionism and appeasement of Russia. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/16/jd-vances-vp-nomination-will-cause-chills-in-ukraine.html

For more on Sudetenland and appeasement, go to https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2024/09/the-fools-opposing-us-aid-to-ukraine.html

In addition to repeating history, , MAGA has been trying to rewrite history, blaming Biden for Putin's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. That is diversionary and nuts. It is a way to divert attention from the more important question: What"deal" would Trump hand Putin if Trump won in 2024 on day one of swearing in. 

 But if pointing fingers is the diversionary game  MAGA is playing, then blaming Biden is nutty BS. Putin had been trying to take over Ukraine for years, and Trump had been Putin's useful idiot.. No wonder Putin misjudged the extent of US support for Ukraine. Trump in the White House had been using Ukraine for his own purposes, blackmailing Zelensky to find dirt on Hunter Biden so he could rant about the Biden crime family (failed to connect Pres. Biden), slap on the hand for Russia's grab of Crimea from Ukraine a minimum opposition to Russia's little green men and warfare in eastern Ukraine, and weakening NATO and American alliances to undermine its ability to respond. In fact, there is evidence Putin had made the decision to invade Ukraine with the Russian army as early as March 2021,   a year earlier.  Biden had let Putin know the US would strongly support Ukraine if Russia invaded in a warning made in advance to Putin on February 12, 2022, that Putin chose to ignore. Instead, Putin began the invasion on February 24, 2022, when he thought he would take over the capital, Kyiv, in three days. He never reached that goal thanks to Ukraine's resistance and US and NATO aid.   https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-putin-warning-russia-invades-ukraine.

Biden's support of Ukraine was and is based on national US national security interests and is not charity.  It is necessary to stop the Russian takeover of NATO allies in Eastern Europe.  That would be a bloody test of NATO's military resolve,  drawing the US into putting boots on the ground.  

 Harris's view of Trump negotiating with Putin, Trump is so smitten by Putin's flattery, "Putin would eat Trump for lunch".  700  national security and former military brass recently endorsed  Harris because they do not think Trump is fit to be commander and chief and should not be trusted to support US national security interests.    https://www.axios.com/2024/09/22/national-security-officials-endorse-harris/

 But if pointing fingers is the diversionary game  MAGA is playing, then blaming Biden is nutty BS.  In fact, Putin had made the decision to invade Ukraine a year earlier. There is evidence that after years of annexing Crimea and fighting in the Donbas region, and abortive attempts at negotiations, Putin made the decision in March 2021 when Ukraine shut down his pro-Russian media outlet in Ukraine. Subversion and propaganda, the stalemate in Donbas were not working for him and his goal to absorb Ukraine into mother Russia. https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-putin-lanned-ukraine-invasion-march-2021-vyorstka/32379171.html  Biden saw a full takeover of Ukraine would green light Putin to invade Poland and the Baltics regardless of their membership in the mutual defense treaty of NATO. Appeasement would not stop Putin's goals to weaken NATO so he could reconstruct Russian control of their former satellites.  Biden's support of Ukraine as the way to stop the Russian takeover of Eastern Europe coincides and directly tests NATO's military, leading to WWIII.  

Wednesday, September 18, 2024

Trump's psyche tricks depend on voters' ignorance to succeed.

 Aside from the substance of whatever is a fascist, watching this exchange over the past couple of years, "You are a fascist, no you are one",  is common.  Variations of this are new ones hurled by Trump at Harris," You are a communist and fascist" (as yet not been answered by Harris ). These kinds of exchanges remind me of the old schoolyard taunts: Your mother is a (fill in the blanks)...., no your mother is one.....   Actually, it is an old psychological trick: https://www.kindersleysocial.ca/webarchive/psychological-tactics-at-work/ Karl Marx stated it so clearly: "Accuse your enemy of what you are doing as you are doing it to create confusion." Some call this "projection", branding others for what you have been criticized for being.  Let's face it, it's still going on, and it works for Trump.  

Trump's psyche tricks depend on ignorance to succeed. Somewhere along the line, many in the US fall for such mind games because they somehow forgot or never learned the definition of the words being thrown around.  While both sides practice the taunts, Trump has made this psyche trick his standard operating procedure to deflect criticism. 

What has also happened is that terms are not defined but just connected to an example as if it is a mike dop " You are like Hitler,";" You are like the old communists,"; "You want to be a dictator like Putin, etc.".... all geared to rile up the other side or to buck up your own.  Trump himself is responsible for the Hitler analogy with  his frequent invoking of terms and words found in Nazi writings. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trumps-history-adolf-hitler-nazi-writings-analysis

The best defense against falling for the trick is to educate yourself about words loosely used in taunts in the 2024 campaign terms ( fascism, communism, democracy, dictatorship, autocracy).  Then, you can see what "shoe fits." The best sources of definitions are supplied by those who do not have a horse on which they are betting in this race and are stated in clear, simple English. Dictionaries are good at this. They lack any shades of gray and " yes, buts," but they provide an agreed-upon yardstick against which you can measure and make a case for how what you believe fits in. 

FASCISM has many definitions, but most overlap. From Merriam-Webster: "a  ", movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascists) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and advocates a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. "From the Cambrdge dictionary: " political system based on a very powerful leaderstate control of social and economic life, and extreme pride in country and race, with no expression of political disagreement allowed. "

COMMUNISM:  I picked this definition from the National Geographic because it was aimed at grades 5-8."Communism is a form of government most closely associated with the ideas of Karl Marx, which he outlined in The Communist Manifesto. Communism is based on the goal of eliminating socioeconomic class struggles by creating a classless society in which everyone shares the benefits of labor and the state controls all property and wealth."What's the difference between communism and fascism. This from Quizlet is the one that comes closest to mine: "Two similarities between fascism and communism are that they both imposed totalitarian governments and both claimed to rule in the national interests. One difference between the two is that communists sought world revolution while fascists pursued nationalism. Another difference is that communist supporters were the urban working class, while fascist supporters were business leaders, wealthy landowners, and the lower middle class."

DEMOCRACY : This one from Meriam Webster:  a
government by the people especially rule of the majority.,,,a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections"  That is roughly the kind of government we have had for 250 years.

DICTATORSHIP From  Cambridge:

"Dictatorship is a form of government in which one person or a small group possesses absolute
 power without effective constitutional limitations. ....Dictators usually resort to force or fraud to 
gain despotic political power, which they maintain through the use of intimidation, terror, and 
the suppression of basic civil liberties. They may also employ techniques of mass propaganda in
 order to sustain their public support"

AUTOCRACY: from Cambridge: "government by a single person or small group that has unlimited power or authority  "     My observation: This differs only from dictatorship because it is the rule of a person,  not of a group.  

If Project 2025 is the blueprint and Trump is only the vessel that activates the plan, this could morph our country into a dictatorship of white Christian nationalists.   Educating the public about the contents of Project 2025 is the challenge. For that purpose, House Democrats will hold hearings: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/09/19/house-democrats-plan-multimedia-project-2025-hearing/


https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2024/09/how-project-2025-could-turn-us-into.html

Saturday, September 14, 2024

My elevator pitch when MAGA claims Biden was a failure

My elevator pitch when MAGA claims Biden was a failure and his successful handoff to Harris that Trump would upend. It may take more than one floor on the elevator for this pitch, maybe two. Updated 10 8 2024

https://www.forbes.com/sites/christianweller/2024/03/22/the-economy-is-much-stronger-than-four-years-ago/

  We had COVID. Remember?? That put the economy on ice. It was the worst economy since the Great Depression and Trump handed that off to Biden.  When it thawed in 2021, there was pent-up consumer demand and screwed-up supply chains that caused too much demand for supplies, causing inflation. Biden fixed it. The inflation rate is now back to normal; interest rates already going down. Gas at the pump less than a buck more than when Trump left office. Grocery price inflation has stopped, but it is still too high. Housing and rents are still too high. Trump has no plan to fix those; Harris does. Trump's plans include cross-the-board tariffs on all imports, with costs passed on to consumers, adding $4K to a family's annual expenses.

Federal Funds Rate: What It Is, How It's Determined, and Why It's Important

, and the highest employment rates in 50 years. Everyone has a job if they want to work; normal economic growth and wages are rising higher than inflation. Big pharma fought, and prescription drug prices lowered. Immigration illegal border crossings are fewer than when Trump left office. The crime rate is lower than in Trump's years. Rip-roaring Wall Street. No oil shortage and we are now nearing energy independence. Fixed a bunch of bridges and roads, retooled more rust belt with 21st-century industry, and lowered gas at pump prices. Russian aggression checked. Fed cut interest rates 9/18 as inflation licked.. That is Biden's handoff to Harris. 

This paragraph moved to a stand alone post as well.Yet to fix. High grocery prices. Grocery prices for food at home rose less than 1% over 12 months, so the bleeding has stopped. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm Just griping fixes nothing. Price gouging prosecution among fixes in Harris's priorities and plans. (Trump's fix plans? zero, no power to roll back prices, but he plans to make it worse with high tariffs on all imports, including it appears on fruits and vegetables we get in the winter from Chile and Mexico). Harris on grocery prices: taking action to lower grocery costs—increasing food assistance for low-income families, strengthening supply chains to lower food prices, and cracking down on price gouging and promoting competition in the agriculture industry.  https://time.com/7011865/kamala-harris-economic-plan-groceries-child/

Trumps plans impact more than just food prices. Screw the middle-class consumers with import tariffs, destabilize the country with racial conflict, destroy democracy and the rule of law, replace the rule of the people using ballots with the rule of Trump now immune from criminal prosecution, use violence to suppress opposition, limit freedom of speech and media, cave into foreign adversaries, have the government take away women's control of their bodies and health, and end civil rights protections..

 https://www.axios.com/2024/06/25/nobel-prize-winners-biden-economy-trump-inflation#:~:text=%22We%20believe%20that%20a%20second,has%20come%20down%20remarkably%20fast..

 https://www.axios.com/2024/06/25/nobel-prize-winners-biden-economy-trump-inflation

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/09/18/fed-cuts-rates-september-2024-.html

expect MAGA to claim fed dramatic reduction in interest rates yesterday was political;. Fed reserve chair Jerome Powell was appointed chair by Donald Trump and held over by Biden. Fed reserve board composed of 12 members serving long terms and appointed by a variety of presidents and vote was 11to 1 for interest rate deductions.

Wednesday, September 4, 2024

Update on immigration issues: Harris gains and Trump's BS exposed

Update 9 28 24 : There's a new sheriff coming to town: Harris on immigration: go to https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2024/09/harris-on-immigration-theres-new.html

Update 9 28 24  Aurora, Colorado is now a Trump hype of Venezuelan gangs taking over the city. That is the usual tactic of Trump: take a limited event and blow it up to apply to the whole.  Such has been the case in Aurora, Colorado.  The gang activity was limited to a few buildings. Gang members have already been arrested and charged and will likely be in jail  and then on their way back to Venezuela with their special protective status revoked.  That is the way it works. https://www.axios.com/local/denver/2024/09/11/aurora-venezuelan-gang-arrests-mike-coffman-danielle-jurinsky

Update 9/4/24: (Also reproduced as a separate posting)  Fear and loathing of all immigrants is key to Trump's campaign. However, it is based on factual BS.  The facts on the immigrant crime wave? There is not one.  https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/debunking-myth-migrant-crime-waveTrump sabotaged the only bipartisan bill to address it this past winter. Biden used what executive powers he had and cooperation by Mexico. The result was the lowest illegal crossing in 3 years. Catch and release is down 65%. We would have been on our way to even lower figures without Trump's wrecking the bill..  The executive orders Biden utilized face court challenges, but for now it has been effective and is still in effect. In addition, Mexico has cracked down on migrants, tripling their deportations.  Trump's campaign of fear and hatred of immigrants causing crime is debunked by statistics, ignored by  Trump's MAGA whose fuel is hatred of others unlike them.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/border-crossings-us-mexico-border-june-2024

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/26/border-crossings-drop-biden-policy-00165055          

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/mexico-stopping-three-times-as-many-migrants-as-last-year-rcna146821

Immigrants, as a whole, are less likely to commit violent crimes. https://www.npr.org/2024/03/08/1237103158/immigrants-are-less-likely-to-commit-crimes-than-us-born-americans-studies-find

Illegal immigrants are not more likely to commit violent crimes: in fact, the opposite is true: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/debunking-myth-migrant-crime-wave

Will Biden's executive order survive a legal challenge? "Biden's proclamation leans on Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act that lets a president limit entry of specific migrants if it is "detrimental" to national interest. Trump used the same provisions with his 2017 banning of people from Muslim-majority countries and a later policy barring asylum seekers that was ultimately struck down by courts. Biden administration officials insist the new proposal is very different, but that will likely do little to prevent expected lawsuits to stop it. The American Civil Liberties Union vowed to challenge the order in court. "It was illegal when Trump did it, and it is no less illegal now," said Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the organization's Immigrants’ Rights Project. "    https://www.texastribune.org/2024/06/04/texas-mexico-border-biden-immigration-asylum-policy.

A humane approach to immigration policy is the bi-partisan bill Trump killed because he wanted the issue to still be hot as he campaigns. There is also a possibility to contrast policies that may have a broader appeal to those who indeed want the border crisis to be handled, but not with the cruelty of Trump's plan.  What the bi-partisan bill lacks is Trump's plan to use the US Army to break up families with mixed status (an estimated 6.7 million families) and deport 20K total without documents, putting them in concentration camps waiting for deportation. 

Harris  needed to revive flagging Hispanic support of Democrats (Trump 46%; Biden was 40%) that was a reverse of past statistics and the left flank of Democrats uneasy with even the bi-partisan bill Trump killed. The first step is to attack Trump for killing the bi-partisan bill. which Harris just did. With illegal border crossings now equal to Trump's data as he left office, the Democrats have highlighted that update.  Harris has gained significant approval by Hispanics, but there is still more to do. https://www.semafor.com/article/09/03/2024/kamala-harris-poll-hispanic-voters-climate-healthcare The next could be to paint the Trump approach based on racism, hate, cruelty, and fear, while the bipartisan bill approach is both humane and effective. With many in the Latino community also resenting the flood of migrants at the border, the humane plan of Harris might have some appeal. Harris is following the old bit of wisdom: the best defense is a great offense. However, she still needs to reverse the loss of Hispanic voters...https://thehill.com/homenews/4801766-kamala-harris-donald-trump-border