While politics can divide Grand County, there is an issue that should
unite us. It flows through us and it is important to us all, whether we
simply enjoy it, use it for recreation, or depend on it for tourist and
fishing businesses or ranching. It is the Fraser River and its
tributaries and Denver Water's Moffat Firming Project plan to divert 80
percent of its natural flow to the Eastern Slope.
Push is
coming to shove soon on critical approvals of the project. Some local
decision-makers signed off on it with the impression that the
environmental problems have been resolved. A large number of landowners
who think otherwise are petitioning the Army Corps of Engineers and the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to deny the diversion plans until
better measures are taken to minimize the damage.
I have lived
both part time and full time for the past 43 years on a bluff above that
Fraser River. When our children were young, I remember on a still
summers' night hearing the water 250 feet below us rush through its
native channel. The clear, cold water ran deeply enough to allow our
youngsters to splash in it on a hot summer day. Our youngest daughter,
nearly 9, pulled a 14-inch rainbow out of the water herself (with the
help of a nearby fisherman and his net). It was her first big one and
she caught it with salmon eggs on a dime store rod and reel.
Later, the Fraser River Trail gave us a place to walk our dogs, but also
brought us face to face with algae and a diminished river barely worthy
of being called a creek. Denver Water has already taken 60 percent
from it and they now want to divert another 20 percent.
Even in
its diminished flow, the beavers, chased out by trappers in the '70's,
have returned and we thrill to see the moose nibbling on the willows.
Red wing blackbirds fly up to our feeder and perch on our deck's rails
and deer tread silently down through a nearby gully to water. It is for
our family more than a stream; it is part of our lives.
For
others in this valley, it brings business; fly shops and ambiance for
condos, cabins and year-round homes near its banks. It is where cattle
drink and irrigated hay grows, where golfers tap balls and dig divots on
the greens along, it and where tourists view the wildlife it attracts.
An
agreement has been signed by some county officials who think it is the
best deal they can get with Denver Water to provide mitigation of the
impacts that such a drastic draining would bring to the willows,
wetlands, and fishing. Scientific measurements show that the river is so
shallow in the heat of summer, the temperature rises and the fish die.
Denver Water is proposing to provide 250 acre-feet of water in August
only to flush out mud and to lower the temperature. However, there are
others who see this as inadequate. Temperatures are rising in June,
July ,and September as well, and the volume released will not be enough
to flush out the mud. Those who object to the plan that is being
proposed believe that the environmental impact statements submitted
are so inadequate, there is no way to assess the long term harm.
A
group of land owners is writing a letter to the Army Corps and the EPA
asking them to restrict diversion when stream temperatures approach
state standards, to provide adequate flushing flows, and ongoing
monitoring with provisions to allow for future adjustments and more
mitigation measures if the conditions deteriorate. For those who would
like to know more, contact kk@wprwater.com. I will be writing a similar letter, too.
For comments on Tuesday's election, see below.
No comments:
Post a Comment