Calling every failing
of those in high places “scandals” has
become the most overused and abused word in politics these
past 12 months. . Politicians
beware. Voters are smarter than you
think. All scandals are not equal and
you may be able to fool some voters part
of the time, but not all voters all of
the time.
Since Watergate, all those seeking to take down a powerful
person have found scandal mongering to be the most effective tool in the
political arsenal. 24/7 ideologically partisan news channels and eager beaver
investigative reporters are the megaphones, hoping to make any shortcoming the equal of Watergate by
call it a “scandal”, too. Calling it one does not make it one.
Voters have shown the
ability to tell the difference between a serious scandal, and one that is a
lesser offense that is not a game changer.
The sexual misconduct of Pres. Bill Clinton may have gotten him
impeached , his policies and execution of his duties may have been delayed, but
they were not stopped. Voters saw
through the politics of that impeachment process: an attempt to cripple a
leader with morals charges to block his
agenda. In contrast, Watergate coverup and dirty deeds traced directly to Pres.
Richard Nixon’s scheming resulted in his
resignation to avoid impeachment.
Hillary Clinton and
Ben Ghazi and New Jersey Governor
Christ Christie’s Bridgegate, and rogue IRS agents discriminating
against conservatives groups in a
distant office are hawked to media consumers as equally serious
“scandals”. These share very different DNA, one about political hard ball and charges of misuse of power by Christie’s officials and another, Clinton, about failure to use power and misjudgments of
underlings and even of a victim himself. True, this resulted in four dead Americans.
IRS discrimination against conservative groups were never traced to Pres.
Obama. What all have in common is they are as much about the
presidential race in 2016 and midterms 2014 and the fodder they give potential opponents.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said at his epic news
conference, “politics ain’t beanbag” as
he defended himself against charges his
staff took revenge on political
“enemies” by blocking traffic on the George Washington Bridge. New accusations
that he used rewarding of Hurricane
Sandy repair funds as a bludgeon are emerging So far it looks like he plays politics with a
hockey puck. Whether it rises to a crime and he is found to hold the smoking
gun is not yet known nor is it to be automatically assumed. Voters should wait and see.
Wait and see about Ben Ghazi should be over. The bi-partisan
report issued in January by the Senate Intelligence
Committee moved Ben Ghazi from the Fox
chatterers to the main stream topic, and it did
pin blame on the State Department . The
decisions that contributed to the tragedy were never traced to policy directives
from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
The buck did not get passed to her. But for now
Ben Ghazi becomes a continuing “scandal” in the eyes of the GOP . Some Republicans vowed just to ignore the report and to keep on
putting a fictitious smoking gun in her
hands. Most voters will not buy that line. The evidence is just not there.
No comments:
Post a Comment