Showing posts with label Venezuelan gang deportation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Venezuelan gang deportation. Show all posts

Thursday, September 4, 2025

The false pretext: President loses a power grab strategy with Harvard, California, migrant due process rulings

The President is losing a power grab strategy with his action on Harvard, the deployment of military in California, and migrant due process ICE policies. The courts are not buying his use of pretexts to justify his actions.   Is Trump using false pretexts to justify military actions to seek regime change and revisit denied court actions, as he kills 11 Venezuelan drug sailors and floods the Caribbean with US military assets in a Wag the Dog scenario and reclassifies drug smugglers as "terrorists"? His most flagrant example of a false pretext is the misuse of revenge on Colorado's mail-in ballot system as a pretext for moving the space command center to Alabama. Trump has been trying to move the center since 2016, but had never tied it to mail-in ballots until now.

  One of the tools of terror to force institutions, private and public, to bend to Trump's power grabs is to use unrelated issues in order to get compliance with his policies and to justify anti-constitutional acts of withholding funding.  The pretext is false, and courts are not being fooled in recent lower court decisions. Most of these rulings will end up in the Supreme Court. (Oxford dictionary:Pretext: a reason given in justification of a course of action that is not the real reason.)  I would add that even the pretext itself can be used and abused and distorted, and it can be just as false as the issue and facts to which they are referring are false, as well.("False Pretense"is the word used in common language, but it also has a meaning  in the law closely associated with criminal real estate transactions so I am using "pretext" to avoid any confusion.)

Trump's attempt to force Harvard to change their curriculum and admissions polices, contrary to Trump's interests, by using the issue of anti-Semitism, just hit the fan.  A judge ruled that Trump's withholding of $2 billion in federal research grants unless Harvard complied with demands that were unrelated to anti-Semitism actions on campus was illegal. Judge says Trump administration unlawfully blocked $2 billion from Harvard | CNN Politics This ruling will be appealed, but in the meantime, the Trump strategy to scare all, including private institutions, engaged in higher ed that dare teach a liberal viewpoint, and the intellectual debate of multiple views, to change curriculum and staff to support his one-sided view, is being stopped.  Trump's attempt to control the ability of all Americans at any level of education to hear or learn views other than Trump is also obvious from attempts to force the Smithsonian to remove or reduce references to the ills of slavery in American history and the resulting civil rights movement. 

The grand daddy of false pretexts: to deploy military, national guard, or active duty contrary to the Posse Comitatus Act as applied to states' rights, is that there is a "national emergency", a loophole that would give him the power to do it. That one also was shot down in flames regarding the deployment of troops to California, and my also echo in other incidents, including his attempt to hype up the crime issue in blue states, when ignoring the even worse rate of crime in red states. After ruling against LA Guard use, Trump vows more deployments : NPR   Next on  Trump's plans: send troops into Chicago.  The use of federal troops in DC is a different situation, since Washington, DC, is not a state, but is subject to degrees of federal control and home rule.. It is obvious that such a declaration of national emergency serves his political ambitions to pull a trick out of the magic political hat." Democrats are always soft on crime, so fear them, and Republicans are hard-nosed." Watch that controversy to be on the top burner if Trump continues with plans in Chicago and Baltimore.

 So far, lower courts have ruled against the pretext of a "national emergency" as a means to circumvent the Constitutional provisions that Trump sees as standing in the way of his power grabs. Many of these rulings will likely be appealed to the Supreme Court.  The terms "abuse of power " and"overreach" are too kind. Recent cases are examples of power grabs by strong leaders who seek to wield the same powers as a dictator, ruling by one person who declares what the law is, rather than being established through a democratic process, subject to compliance and interpretations to justify Trump's real power grab attempts.

 As a recent example, Trump's order to move the space command from Colorado Springs to Alabama because Colorado defied his newest anti-voter access to the ballot box by mail. Trump says he's moving Space Command HQ to Alabama because of Colorado's mail-in voting system. This is purely a matter of revenge (against a blue state) to favor a supporter (red Alabama). In reality, the location of the space command has always been a matter of politics, since his first term, regardless of any financial or military considerations, and mail-in ballots were never linked to the move until now. The false pretext  Trump made in his announcement was not even disguised: He was moving it because of Colorado's mail-in system as retaliation.

 In fact, the anti-mail-in ballots argument rests on a false pretext itself.  There was widespread fraud, ballot harvesting, etc in 2020, caused by mail-in ballots, when nearly every opportunity in courts (at least a minimum of 60 court rulings), or for John Q Public to provide evidence in the past five years has failed.  Conservative group finds ‘absolutely no evidence of widespread fraud’ in 2020 election

Is he now planning military action against Venezuela (yes, we are at war now) to justify defying the Constitution clauses regarding due process and/or breaking international maritime laws and/or force regime change in that country?   Trump announced our military attacked a drug smuggling boat, and now he wants to get Venezuela's drug smugglers classified as terrorists, though, why? I suspect it is either to give legal cover to the US violating territorial waters, or to justify his illegal attempt to violate Venezuelan migrants' due process rights by zealous ICE action, already claiming Venezuela was at war with the US.  under the Alien Enemies Act.  An appeals court rejected the abuse of that act. US appeals court rejects Trump's use of Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelans | Reuters  For those engaged in conspiracy theories, it would not be put past Trump to declare the US was at war against Venezuela in order to take even more action against migrant mass deportation, regardless of whether they had committed any crimes. Secretary of State Marco Rubio from Florida has also had a long held desire to end the Maduro dictatorship. Wag the dog, the use of a false pretext for war can even itself be a false pretext. Inventing and provoking an incident is not just a strategy found in literature and movies.

Sometimes, the pretext to justify an action is not due to a scheme or grand plan, but sheer ignorance or perceived opportunity to make a point without knowing the facts. Within the same 24 hours, Trump confused 5-year-old videos with current facts, and AG Pam Bondi tried to cherry-pick examples of dangerous migrants in big blue cities, when the incidents did not happen in the city she claimed they did. It may also happen because Trump has only yes people advising him, who could intervene and correct him before he opens his mouth and sticks his foot in it. Here is an example of that: Trump, watching FOX, did not realize he was watching a 5-year-old video of George Floyd protests and claimed "last night" he saw Portland being destroyed, so it was time to threaten to send the military into the city and put that city on his list to try to oppress. I wonder how many in MAGAland thought that Portland, Oregon, was being destroyed last night?    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-threatens-to-send-troops-to-city-he-says-he-saw-being-destroyed-last-night-but-it-wasn-t/  In the same24 hour span, AG Pam Bondi claimed migrants committed horrific crimes to justify military action on blue cities when the examples she used took place miles from the city of Boston.  https://www.thedailybeast.com/pam-bondi-takes-aim-at-boston-citing-crimes-from-elsewhere/


Monday, April 14, 2025

Are we now in a constitutional crisis? Has push come to shove over a Venezuelan deportee?updated: 4/17,2025

Update 4/18/2025 GOP Judge Darkly Warns Of Last Chance To Avoid Tyranny   The appeals court rejected the Trump administration appeal in the case of the wrongly deported Abrego-Garcia: The ruling is also a wakeup call: 
  • The government is asserting a right to stash away residents of this country in foreign prisons without the semblance of due process that is the foundation of our constitutional order.”

  • “If today the Executive claims the right to deport without due process and in disregard of court orders, what assurance will there be tomorrow that it will not deport American citizens and then disclaim responsibility to bring them home?”

  • “Now the branches come too close to grinding irrevocably against one another in a conflict that promises to diminish both.”

  • “The Executive may succeed for a time in weakening the courts, but over time history will script the tragic gap between what was and all that might have been, and law in time will sign its epitaph.”

The whole order is worth your time.

Share

The Deportation-Big Data Industrial Complex

A leak from inside Palantir to 404 Media shows the high tech surveillance company is assisting ICE with locating migrants targeted for deportation.

In possibly related news: Former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, who is now serving as de facto chief of staff to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, told DHS officials to give Palantir additional work after he organized a tour for Noem of a Palantir facility, the WSJ reports:

Weeks after the tour, the company co-founded by Peter Thiel would get an additional $29.9 million from the agency under an existing contract—specifically to deploy its powerful software for immigration “targeting and enforcement” and “self-deportation tracking,” records show.

Lewandowski has no formal position at DHS but “he has used his close relationship with Noem to wield power” in his role as a “special government employee,” the WSJ noted.

The Deportation-Higher Ed Industrial Complex

At least 10 of Florida’s public universities have struck agreements with ICE authorizing campus police to question and detain undocumented immigrants, Inside Higher Ed reports.

Trump Retaliates Against Harvard

After Harvard refused to capitulate to President Trump’s demands, the administration is now threatening to block the school from enrolling international students unless it hands over detailed records about the student body.

Trump’s Newest Target: Nonprofit Orgs

On the heels of threatening to yank Harvard’s tax-exempt status, President Trump threatened to target the tax-exempt status of other nonprofit organizations with whom his disagrees, singling out Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington for his ire.

Ed Martin Is At It Again … In A New Realm

Acting D.C. U.S. Attorney Ed Martin, who incidentally has been less than forthcoming with the Senate Judiciary Committee as it considers his nomination to the permanent position, has sent one of his series of highly inappropriate, abusive, and threatening letters of inquiry to a peer-reviewed medical journal:

For Your Radar …

  • EAC: TPM’s Kate Riga reports from court in DC, where an increasingly frustrated federal judge called out the Election Assistance Commission for beginning to implement President Trump’s executive order on elections even though the administration denied it had done anything yet.

  • CFPB: U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson of D.C. has scheduled a hearing this morning on whether mass layoffs at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau violate her preliminary injunction that essentially kept the Trump administration from shuttering the agency.

  • SSA: U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander has issued a preliminary injunction blocking DOGE from accessing the sensitive personal information of millions of Americans stored by the Social Security Administration.

Fun Read

Brian Beutler: Don’t Let Soft Donald Trump Redefine Masculinity And The Meaning Of Work

Quote Of The Day

TPM’s Josh Marshall:

We can talk endlessly about whether we’re still in a democracy or whether Trump wants to be or is acting like a dictator. We can debate words such as “fascism” that were unknown before a century ago. But what we are seeing right now is the definition of tyranny, a half-archaic concept the founders of the American Republic were very familiar with. Trump’s rule is both lawless and arbitrary. He has taken the bundle of powers the Constitution provides him to govern and defend the Constitution and turned them to an entirely different and corrupt purpose: using them as weapons to attack the people and institutions he deems his enemies.

‘We Are All Afraid’

In the course of describing her experience of the current Trump II moment, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) makes an extraordinary admission:

The Bulwark @thebulwark.bsky.social
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R): "We are all afraid…I am oftentimes very anxious myself about using my voice because retaliation is real."
Thu, 17 Apr 2025 14:01:58 GMT
View on Bluesky

Share Morning Memo


Not yet a TPM member?

The best way to support Morning Memo is by joining TPM. Read our mission.

Become A Member

Thanks for reading Morning Memo! Subscribe for free to receive new posts.

Help us make Morning Memo better. Reply to this email to give us your feedback.

 
Like
Comment
Restack
 

© 2025 TPM
PO Box #490 217 W 18th St, New York, NY 10011, United States
Unsubscribe

Start writing


Origianl post continues:
Trump has chosen to defy the courts, setting up a full-blown constitutional crisis; an act, if successful, would destroy the courts' effectiveness in enforcing any rule. This Venezuelan deportee case is the case the Trump administration is choosing to try to challenge and destroy the independence of the judicial system and make him the ruler of the law.  The Trump regime thinks they are clever because Venezuelans do not have any sympathy in the American population, and the fact that the victim had been wrongfully deported is uncontested, so those questions are off the table. But now it is down to brass tacks: Who controls the rule of law: Trump or the independent judiciary?  Update: 4/16/2025 https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/judge-boasberg-trump-criminal-contempt-deportation-rcna200064
This was over the sneaky removal of deportees before they could face a due process hearing. The Judge has the power to prosecute and appoint an attorney to do so if the DOJ refuses.
Still there is another possible contempt of court case from another judge who has been asking for proof that the Trump regime has made any effort to 'facilitate" the return the wrongfully deported individual per the Supreme Court ruling.

Please don't whine that in writing this, it means I am opposed to deporting Venezuelan gang members if they are that. Don't give me that BS. What is at stake is our treasured rule of law and an independent judicial system that is supposed to be a coequal branch of government to Congress and the Executive branch, with checks and balances on each other. The principles at stake are huge and not understated. 

To act like he is not defying the Supreme Court, Trump is trying to claim SCOTUS did not mean what they said, you must get the victim back to the US. Failing that, the Trump administration contends it has no duty to return an illegally deported man to the US - POLITICO. 

The right-wing press goes off the rails when every judge's decision that goes against the Trump regime is called an anti-MAGA or anti-Trump decision. Cut it out. The decisions are about neither. Most of the district judges may be appointed by Democrats, but most of the decisions going in the Trump regime's favor were also appointed by Democrats.  It is decided upon whether the case violates the rule of law and/or the Constitution.. What sort of justice is that when all judges rule in favor of Trump's attempt to get away with unconstitutional executive orders, as he is trying to do/ Judges are sworn to support the rule of law and make it the standard for whether a case is decided one way or the other.  Trump's strategy seems to be go ahead and break the rule of law, violate the constitution and its provisions, and then see what he can get away with in the courts, in decisions, and in enforcement of those decisions. Violations and defiance become a test of wills.  In those instances, if  Trump wins, you can kiss the rule of law goodbye and say hello to a bona fide dictator, Trump.
 
 In the Venezuelan case, the issues are as follows: "Can the executive branch defy a court order and get away with it now and in the future? SCOTUS, all 9 clearly agreed the deportees all had to have a due process hearing before a judge before being shipped to jail, wherever in the world. That was no win for Trump, despite the spin they falsely claimed.  The consequence of a Trump regime win against the Supreme Court for their defiance in returning the victim. If Trump succeeds,  the judicial system would be powerless if the executive branch, the Trump regime, disagrees with a court's ruling.
 It also clears the way for the Trump regime to snatch anyone they consider undesirable citizens and undocumented migrants with no criminal records, and send them to an offshore gulag. He wouldn't dare do that to American citizens, you think? Guess again. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-says-he-supports-deporting-u-s-citizens/vi-AA1CU8zA?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=9d78653544234f2fb51ec936c412c15d&ei=5

 The Trump regime did have a way out. The President of El Salvador visited Trump today in the White House, and he could have "voluntarily" released the victim that is the focus of this defiant action. He did not.  He said no.  Now on to the courts of appeals and to the Supreme Court again in a full-out constitutional crisis, which Trump seems determined to cause in order to try to break the courts.

 What should those who support the rule of law fear the most: what will happen if the Trump regime defies a court order? By whom and how can there be any enforcement? MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: What those who support the rule of law should fear the most updated


"While judges appointed by Democratic presidents have been the most active in impeding Trump’s agenda, the majority of judges who left the president’s executive actions in place were also appointed by Democratic presidents. Of the 19 judges who kept the orders in place, 12 of them were appointed by Biden, Obama and Clinton. Seven of the judges were appointed by Republican presidents Trump and Bush."

Tuesday, April 8, 2025

The Trump regime plot to break the rule of law:Act like a dictator first:get SCOTUS ok later Update to 4/19/2025

 It is becoming clear that the Trump regime's strategy to break the rule of law and make law the rule of a dictator: Act like a dictator first, and then see how much they can get away with it later, using the Supreme Court for OKs.

The Trump regime is attempting to tear down the rule of law, by threatening impeachment of judges whose rullnges they do not like, bullying large law firms into not representing clients the Trump regime does not like, and now threatening to defy court orders in the wrongfully deporting Venezualan gang members, depositing them in El Salvador jails the US funds, and now defying court orders to return them to the US to face due process hearings.)  The Supreme Court then ruled unanimously that before deportation, there must be a hearing before a judge, a right granted by the Constitution to all persons in the US, not just citizens. 

Update 5/4/2025 https://www.msn.com/.../trump-says-i-don-t.../ar-AA1E9aNM...

THOUGHT THAT WAS WHAT HE SWORE TO DO WHEN INAUGURATED!!!
Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Updates: 4/19/2025.What is critical about the decisions surrounding the Abrego-Garcia case is not just an unjust treatment of an individual, it is the precedent it sets for anyone else, that the same bogus arguments could be used against anyone, US citizen or migrant, who dares to speak out against the government or just spends time with the wrong crowd. Those considered undesirable in a tyrant's eyes can be abused by a (king, dictator,)citing a decision favorable to the tyrant court precedent that in turn affects us all, not just Abrego-Garcia. It is particularly alarming when Trump says he is considering sending bad criminal citizens to offshore prisons. So far, the courts have ruled that all citizens and migrants must have a due process hearing. A sneak removal by airplane in the middle of the night to avoid due process is a possible criminal contempt of a court ruling, that is also being litigated. 

The argument from the right, Abrego-Garcia is a criminal and gang member, without credible crime evidence...just an assertion. That is the problem: who says or decides who is a criminal or gang member?ICE? The A way is to require due process, a hearing before a judge with time to prepare for a defense, and Abrego-Garcia is a case in point. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-trump-deportations-el-salvador-9988b667199e1b02fc0a6a83570225c1

Trump's Team Caved on Abrego Garcia Deportation in 2019 | TIME The court ruled Abrego Garcia had special protection status from deportation because he feared for his live and the Trump administration failed to appeal the ruling. That was in Trump's first term. It was not because he was or was not a gang member.   The court ruled Abrego Garcia had special protection status from deportation because he feared for his live and the Trump administration failed to appeal the ruling. That was in Trump's first term. It was not because he was or was not a gang member. If he had a chance to bring this up before an immigration judge under "due process" clause and not put on a plane the middle of the night before he had a chance to tell a judge, this would not have been an issue. It would be a simple thing to bring Abrego Garcia back to stand before a due process immigration judge (a full trial is not required) to bring up the 2019 order. That is probably why the Trump admin. has been defying the court orders to do so. It would be very embarrassing and the Trump admin. could not plead ignorance since they were the one who screwed up in 2019. In addition, is there any evidence that Abrego Garcia has been actively involved in gang activity since 2019?

The last word about the Alien Enemies Act, under which Trump claims, gives him the right to do what he is doing, whether there is a war with Venezuela. The act was supposed to be used in wartime.That may yet be litigated.https://apnews.com/article/trump-alien-enemies-act-venezuela-tren-de-aragua-103919f71db9a9e7a9a3de102858548

Update 4/19/2025In an attempt to avoid having to toe the line of the rule of law, Trump commits another stretch of truth: The Alien Enemies Act, which was designed to remove enemies during a war. Zap, claims Trump/ We are at war with Venezuela.  We are? That may have stretched an interpretation of the law to the breaking point.  In an emergency ruling the Supreme Court issued a temporary restraining order to stop deportees using that law. https://www.npr.org/2025/04/19/g-s1-61385/supreme-court-block-deportations

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2025/03/whats-big-deal-about-rule-of-law.html

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2025/02/what-those-who-support-rule-of-law.html  What those who support the rule of law should fear the most:  what happens if the Trump regime defies a court order? By whom and how can there be any enforcement?


The Supreme Court just set up a potentially huge clash with Trump   Update: 4/11/2025

https://apnews.com/live/donald-trump-news-updates-4-9-2025#00000196-1b3e-df33-a5d6-5b7facb40000     Courts now denying deportations based on enemies act, likely to go to SCOTUS

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2025/03/whats-big-deal-about-rule-of-law.html

 https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2025/02/what-those-who-support-rule-of-law.htm 

https://apnews.com/article/trump-el-salvador-prison-kilmar-abrego-garcia-5a92d6bd7f893eed64c2607cc129a6f9l     

4/18/2025 GOP Judge Darkly Warns Of Last Chance To Avoid Tyranny   The appeals court rejected the Trump administration appeal in the case of the wrongly deported Abrego-Garcia: The ruling is also a wakeup call: 

  • The government is asserting a right to stash away residents of this country in foreign prisons without the semblance of due process that is the foundation of our constitutional order.”

  • “If today the Executive claims the right to deport without due process and in disregard of court orders, what assurance will there be tomorrow that it will not deport American citizens and then disclaim responsibility to bring them home?”

  • “Now the branches come too close to grinding irrevocably against one another in a conflict that promises to diminish both.”

  • “The Executive may succeed for a time in weakening the courts, but over time history will script the tragic gap between what was and all that might have been, and law in time will sign its epitaph.”