Showing posts with label SCOTUS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SCOTUS. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 9, 2025

Racial profiling in immigration stops and detention greenlighted by the Supreme Court updated to 10/15/2025


Update:10/15/2025 Colorado immigrants' rights groups sue Trump Administration, ICE over alleged warrantless arrests - CBS Colorado. This class action suit, if it makes it to the Supreme Court, has national implications.

Update 9/27/2025 An excellent in-depth article of how ICE is snatching migrants, mostly who are not criminals, just working hard at their jobs, and how it impacts mountain communities. The cost is both human and economic. Grand County lost a familiar face at a McDonald's window, and frightened children are fleeing schools. ‘There’s a human cost’: Colorado mountain towns see student absences, community tension in wake of growing ICE operations | SkyHiNews.com

Continuing with original post: The 6-3 Supreme Court just gave the green light to ICE to snatch people off the street because they look Hispanic and sound Hispanic. It is racial profiling, pure and simple. I am disgusted. The voice of dissent, Justice Sotomayor, wrote:"We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job," she wrote. "Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent." Trump's Supreme Court is chipping away at civil rights with no explanation other than "it's not our job to set immigration enforcement policy," and we need to call them out. That should send a chill through anyone who does not look white for the precedent this sets. Supreme Court gives no explanation as it hands Trump another win

The old warning to anyone who looks Hispanic (or even native Americans), carry your papers ready to show them on the spot, is no real protection as even green card holders and those born here have birth certificates, get detained by ICE. ICE is putting many in holding pens while they "sort it out", and even then, whether the detainee can afford an attorney or even speaks English is a question. Their chance for a "due process" hearing after waiting days in a slammer is a roll of the dice and the hope that some non-profit comes to their rescue.

This is sheer terror, as told to me by my Hispanic friends. Even showing an ICE agent your papers is not always helpful. There are no figures released by the Trump regime that report numbers of those wrongfully detained and even deported, but there are past studies that detail that there were plenty of wrongful detentions dating years before ICE was given a quota ot snatch anyone to make their daily tally. Anecdotal evidence that it is happening now is plentiful if you do a Google search.

La Corte Suprema, con 6 votos a favor y 3 en contra, acaba de dar luz verde al Servicio de Inmigración y Control de Aduanas (ICE) para que secuestre a personas en la calle por su apariencia y sonido hispanos. Es discriminación racial, pura y simplemente. Estoy indignada. La voz disidente, la jueza Sotomayor, escribió: "No deberíamos tener que vivir en un país donde el gobierno pueda detener a cualquiera que parezca latino, hable español y parezca tener un trabajo mal pagado". "En lugar de quedarnos de brazos cruzados mientras se pierden nuestras libertades constitucionales, disiento". La Corte Suprema de Trump está socavando los derechos civiles sin más explicación que "no es nuestra responsabilidad establecer políticas de control migratorio", y debemos denunciarlos. Esto debería estremecer a cualquiera que no parezca blanco por el precedente que esto sienta. La vieja advertencia para cualquiera que parezca hispano (o incluso nativo americano): llevar sus documentos listos para mostrarlos en el acto no es una protección real, ya que incluso los titulares de tarjetas de residencia y los nacidos aquí con certificados de nacimiento son detenidos por el ICE, que simplemente los pone en celdas mientras "resuelven sus problemas". Aun así, si el detenido puede pagar un abogado o si habla inglés, tiene la oportunidad de una audiencia de "debido proceso" después de esperar días en una cárcel es una cuestión de suerte, y la esperanza de que alguna organización sin fines de lucro venga a rescatarlo es un juego de azar. Esto es puro terror, como me contaron mis amigos hispanos. Ni siquiera mostrarle los documentos a un agente del ICE sirve de nada. El régimen de Trump no ha publicado cifras que informen sobre el número de detenidos injustamente e incluso deportados, pero sí hay estudios anteriores que detallan que hubo muchas detenciones injustas años antes de que el ICE tuviera una cuota para capturar a cualquiera por día. Hay abundante evidencia anecdótica de que esto está sucediendo ahora si se busca en Google.

Tuesday, April 8, 2025

The Trump regime plot to break the rule of law:Act like a dictator first:get SCOTUS ok later Update to 4/19/2025

 It is becoming clear that the Trump regime's strategy to break the rule of law and make law the rule of a dictator: Act like a dictator first, and then see how much they can get away with it later, using the Supreme Court for OKs.

The Trump regime is attempting to tear down the rule of law, by threatening impeachment of judges whose rullnges they do not like, bullying large law firms into not representing clients the Trump regime does not like, and now threatening to defy court orders in the wrongfully deporting Venezualan gang members, depositing them in El Salvador jails the US funds, and now defying court orders to return them to the US to face due process hearings.)  The Supreme Court then ruled unanimously that before deportation, there must be a hearing before a judge, a right granted by the Constitution to all persons in the US, not just citizens. 

Update 5/4/2025 https://www.msn.com/.../trump-says-i-don-t.../ar-AA1E9aNM...

THOUGHT THAT WAS WHAT HE SWORE TO DO WHEN INAUGURATED!!!
Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Updates: 4/19/2025.What is critical about the decisions surrounding the Abrego-Garcia case is not just an unjust treatment of an individual, it is the precedent it sets for anyone else, that the same bogus arguments could be used against anyone, US citizen or migrant, who dares to speak out against the government or just spends time with the wrong crowd. Those considered undesirable in a tyrant's eyes can be abused by a (king, dictator,)citing a decision favorable to the tyrant court precedent that in turn affects us all, not just Abrego-Garcia. It is particularly alarming when Trump says he is considering sending bad criminal citizens to offshore prisons. So far, the courts have ruled that all citizens and migrants must have a due process hearing. A sneak removal by airplane in the middle of the night to avoid due process is a possible criminal contempt of a court ruling, that is also being litigated. 

The argument from the right, Abrego-Garcia is a criminal and gang member, without credible crime evidence...just an assertion. That is the problem: who says or decides who is a criminal or gang member?ICE? The A way is to require due process, a hearing before a judge with time to prepare for a defense, and Abrego-Garcia is a case in point. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-trump-deportations-el-salvador-9988b667199e1b02fc0a6a83570225c1

Trump's Team Caved on Abrego Garcia Deportation in 2019 | TIME The court ruled Abrego Garcia had special protection status from deportation because he feared for his live and the Trump administration failed to appeal the ruling. That was in Trump's first term. It was not because he was or was not a gang member.   The court ruled Abrego Garcia had special protection status from deportation because he feared for his live and the Trump administration failed to appeal the ruling. That was in Trump's first term. It was not because he was or was not a gang member. If he had a chance to bring this up before an immigration judge under "due process" clause and not put on a plane the middle of the night before he had a chance to tell a judge, this would not have been an issue. It would be a simple thing to bring Abrego Garcia back to stand before a due process immigration judge (a full trial is not required) to bring up the 2019 order. That is probably why the Trump admin. has been defying the court orders to do so. It would be very embarrassing and the Trump admin. could not plead ignorance since they were the one who screwed up in 2019. In addition, is there any evidence that Abrego Garcia has been actively involved in gang activity since 2019?

The last word about the Alien Enemies Act, under which Trump claims, gives him the right to do what he is doing, whether there is a war with Venezuela. The act was supposed to be used in wartime.That may yet be litigated.https://apnews.com/article/trump-alien-enemies-act-venezuela-tren-de-aragua-103919f71db9a9e7a9a3de102858548

Update 4/19/2025In an attempt to avoid having to toe the line of the rule of law, Trump commits another stretch of truth: The Alien Enemies Act, which was designed to remove enemies during a war. Zap, claims Trump/ We are at war with Venezuela.  We are? That may have stretched an interpretation of the law to the breaking point.  In an emergency ruling the Supreme Court issued a temporary restraining order to stop deportees using that law. https://www.npr.org/2025/04/19/g-s1-61385/supreme-court-block-deportations

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2025/03/whats-big-deal-about-rule-of-law.html

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2025/02/what-those-who-support-rule-of-law.html  What those who support the rule of law should fear the most:  what happens if the Trump regime defies a court order? By whom and how can there be any enforcement?


The Supreme Court just set up a potentially huge clash with Trump   Update: 4/11/2025

https://apnews.com/live/donald-trump-news-updates-4-9-2025#00000196-1b3e-df33-a5d6-5b7facb40000     Courts now denying deportations based on enemies act, likely to go to SCOTUS

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2025/03/whats-big-deal-about-rule-of-law.html

 https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2025/02/what-those-who-support-rule-of-law.htm 

https://apnews.com/article/trump-el-salvador-prison-kilmar-abrego-garcia-5a92d6bd7f893eed64c2607cc129a6f9l     

4/18/2025 GOP Judge Darkly Warns Of Last Chance To Avoid Tyranny   The appeals court rejected the Trump administration appeal in the case of the wrongly deported Abrego-Garcia: The ruling is also a wakeup call: 

  • “The government is asserting a right to stash away residents of this country in foreign prisons without the semblance of due process that is the foundation of our constitutional order.”

  • “If today the Executive claims the right to deport without due process and in disregard of court orders, what assurance will there be tomorrow that it will not deport American citizens and then disclaim responsibility to bring them home?”

  • “Now the branches come too close to grinding irrevocably against one another in a conflict that promises to diminish both.”

  • “The Executive may succeed for a time in weakening the courts, but over time history will script the tragic gap between what was and all that might have been, and law in time will sign its epitaph.”