FYI, "drill baby drill" folks: Why are the prices at the pump still so high? They are not, per most recent news. Update 12/9/2024: Average price per gallon is $3.03 today; in Colorado: $2.80.The Democrat response so far to "drill baby drill" has been that we are pumping more oil than ever. This is correct, but it sounds evasive and does not seem to be connected to pump prices consumers are experiencing. https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/30/business/gas-prices-labor-day-inflation/index.html
WELCOME TO THE BLOG This blog reflects my views of current political issues.. It is also an archive for columns in the Sky Hi News 2011 to November 2019. Winter Park Times 2019 to 2021.(paper publishing suspended in 2021) My Facebook page, the muftic forum, posts blog links, comments, and sharing. Non-political Facebook page: felicia muftic. Subscribe for free on Substack: https://feliciamuftic.substack.com Blog postings are continuously being edited and updated.
Sunday, September 1, 2024
The BS of "drill baby drill"; makes unnecessary useless
Saturday, August 10, 2024
Trump's "drill baby drill" The answer""better energy to power America. That's our future".updated 9 1 2024
The MAGA right chants that only oil can or should meet future needs when they cheer Trump's"drill baby drill." Here's an answer to that. The "drill baby" should be replaced by "better energy to power America" because we need to stop being victims of foreign oil cartel price setting, foreign wars, and the disasters of climate change. Those are the challenges in our future, and oil drilling, the answers of the past, will not meet them.
Update: Sept. 1, 2024
Why are the prices at the pump still so high? They are not, per most recent news ). Reality check: prices at the pump now are less than a dollar more per gallon than they were in December 2019, just before COVID struck and Trump was president. The Democrat response so far to "drill baby drill" has been that we are pumping more oil than ever. This is correct, but it sounds evasive and does not seem to be connected to pump prices consumers are experiencing. https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/30/business/gas-prices-labor-day-inflation/index.html
For Trump, " drill, baby, drill" is a chant that appeals to Trump's base supporters. It makes sense to them, but it is nonsense. The "drill baby drill" Trump's answer to prices is a simplistic Our problem is not a supply of crude oil; we already have so much we are exporting. BS that he hopes he can get away with because the answer is complex. No president, Biden, Trump, or Harris can control the price per barrel of oil. The prices are set in worldwide markets by oil cartels and many other factors as the above CNN article describes. However, presidents can cushion the impact on consumers by being smart about it. They are becoming more energy-independent, technology savvy, and innovative while taking temporary measures as needed, including using less environmentally damaging bridges in the future, like natural gas. Yes, it is a matter of supply v demand. The US currently does not have a supply problem that drives prices up. International events and the pandemic have caused wild swings in gas prices at the pump beginning in 2020. Biden deserves credit for releasing the strategic reserves and increasing oil pumping
The goal should be meeting "energy needs " and not "oil" needs. Going greener adds to "energy" production, not subtracts from it., while oil and natural gas serve as a bridge to a greener future. Natural gas, at least, is less polluting than gasoline. Nuclear and hydrogen power are important parts of the future and are green. Thanks to Biden's leadership, wind, solar, and batteries are becoming cheaper more prevalent, and efficient, and more of them are made in America. This greater reliance on "green" will increase in the future. It is in our national and consumer interests that we stop being victims of foreign oil cartels while addressing global warming disasters as we are experiencing now. Note Harris's reversal from opposing fracking for natural gas to supporting it, which shows a pragmatic flexibility to meet immediate needs as they arise.
Demand crashed during COVID as drivers to work and schools sheltered in place, beginning in the US in February 2020, and prices dropped likewise. Two years later, Russia invaded Ukraine and Europe, supply crashed, and the US had to wean itself off of Russian oil, as did Western Europe. Worldwide prices spiked; Biden released oil reserves, increasing the US supply, and now the oil reserves have been replenished, though the rest of the world is still filling theirs.
(Souce of retaill gas prices at the pump:.https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=EMM_EPMR_PTE_NUS_DPG&f=W )
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-other-big-shift-in-the-presidential-race/ar-AA1oNm9v?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=HCTS&cvid=2a9d137f33bb45f69834150e005f55c3&ei=15
Thursday, August 1, 2024
The pundits in media speculating of Harris VP pick are missing a big point
The focus of media like this Would picking Josh Shapiro actually help Harris in Pennsylvania? (msn.com) is myopic. While Pennsylvania is very important in the electoral count, Shapiro brings another asset: to the table.: support of the business community not yet behind Harris. Harris does have a vulnerability MAGA will attack: just too liberal and a history that is too green for climate deniers. Re: Pennsylviania, one issue that bothers much of the business community is that she once opposed fracking in Pennsylviania. She has already moderated that position some time ago. Pennsyvlania is a huge producer of natural gas and is important to that economy, especially in Trump country in western Pennsylvania. Shapiro on the other hand has invested state policy there to promote production and sales of natural gas. What he brings to the table is a way to blunt the MAGA business attacks because he is greatly respected my contacts tell me in the business community and MAGA is rumored to fear him as a VP pick. So far as the weird attack on Vance goes, the contrast with anyone Harris picks of the top ones on the media speculation list would beat Vance any day, but with Vance, the darling of some big tech guys, this would be a particularly painful contrast of a Shapiro vs Vance.
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Raising more questions about St Vrain: rod storage
I am not opposed to nuclear power; I understand its advantages as a more environmentally friendly alternative to fossil fuels I only want use of nuclear energy done safely and nuclear power advocates and regulatory agencies have a history of not being forthcoming. While we have not had any major accidents since Three Mile Island and gas and oil drilling and coal all have their risks and potential of environmental damage, that still is no excuse to improve safety and to mitigate the threat of damage as much as we can. The disposal of storage of nuclear waste is a problem that must be resolved.
The current controversy over fracking to spring loose natural gas is a case in point of how these energy/environmental issues become politicized. I do believe natural gas is the intermediate fuel of choice provided using it is not a substitute for the necessary goal of establishing solar and wind as our ultimate energy source as soon as possible. Both gas and solar/wind are the least environmentally damaging and the most safe. Both are abundant and would get us off dependency on foreign oil and the consequences of our foreign policy decisions regarding the Middle East being controlled by our reliance so heavily on their oil. Much of the cause of jihadist terrorism can be traced to angry reactions toward US policy of supporting oppressive governments to insure our continued supply.
However, drilling for gas is still a threat to the pristine Colorado mountain areas and we should insist that other areas less fragile should be exploited first. Our Colorado economy is heavily dependent on eco tourism, hunting and beauty. Economics speaking: we need a responsible policy that balances these two competing economic generators. Besides, we as humans have a responsibility to be wise stewards of a beautiful state. After all, that is why so many of us live here: the unspoiled beauty of the place. We must not foul our own nest.
Somehow or other, these energy vs environment vs safetyvs economic issues tend to end up as political footballs and self serving industry spins. Decisions should be about science and engineering; not about political or industry advocacy. Given the tendency of every issue to end up in some sort of partisan debate, perhaps that is just expecting too much.