Thursday, March 26, 2026

Semantics for the masses: "Grifter" for college educated; "pocket padder" for everyone else

 Sometimes the left uses words that are not in common usage and then wonders why it is hard to communicate with those not as well educated. "Grifting" is one of those terms.  I really never heard it often, and I wonder if it meant a person who takes bribes or is just greedy for wealth, a con  artist, unethical, or anything in between.  It does...but I would nominate another term that is in common language. " Pocket padding" or "pocket padder. "

 So much is being made of Trump and family enriching themselves, yet nothing so far has been proved that bribery influencing public policy has happened.  It may well be, but so far it seems that the worst accusation is the violations of gift acceptance forbidden in the Constitution.The Foreign Emoluments Clause (Article I, Section 9, Clause 8) of the U.S. Constitution prohibits any person holding a federal office—including the President—from accepting any present, emolument, office, or title from a foreign state, king, or prince without the consent of Congress. The GOP had persecuted Hunter Biden for trading on his family name and being the son of the president in his business deals in Ukraine. What is happening with the Trump family, and Trump himself, makes Hunter's sin look petty next to theirs. https://www.newyorker.com/news/a-reporter-at-large/trumps-profiteering-hits-four-billion-dollars

If so far there is no evidence of a quid pro quo (bribery), giving gifts is one sure way for foreign powers to win friends and influence people in the Oval Office. Keeping the gifts without Congressional approval is forbidden by the Constitution, but Trump has a habit of ignoring the parts of that document he does not like.  One thing is certain: it is potentially corrupting. 

 MAGA couldn't care less, but I think deep in their hearts they really could become resentful of the wealth accumulation of the Trump family, who are taking advantage of Trump's presidency to accumulate more wealth for themselves and their father.  Class sensitivity is not dead. The ultra-wealthy who are dishonest and greedy are still an object of disdain. MAGA once got riled up about Hunter's mideeds, and the "Biden Crime Family" they never proved. Resentment of a president's son trading on his father's name resonated with them then, but not now. Funny, isn't it. What came to mind was the Mar-a-Lago documents dump. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-showed-off-a-classified-map-during-a-2022-plane-trip-raskin-alleges-in-letter from  Jack Smith's suppressed report.  Allegations and observations have been made that the documents Trump illegally kept were for "business" purposes.  That puts the "Art of the Deal" on a whole new level. 


I found this courtesy of AI, which best describes a pocket padder in the context I am using. https://ludwig.guru/s/pad+their+pockets.   It is an idiomatic expression that means to take advantage of someone or something for personal gain. 

Incompetence: another descriptive word for the Trump administration

 The plummeting polls showing that in every public policy issue category, the Trump administration is facing 40% approval to 60% disapproval is not just a partisan divide, but one that cuts into his own ideologically compatible base. If a voter approved Trump's announced agenda at the beginning of this term, they are seeing that promises are broken. It is not just policies, but bungled execution. They are seeing incompetent leadership, particularly among cabinet members. The buck stops at Trump's desk, and the pile is growing. Trump appointed people he called "the best people" who met the media criteria of a TV face and were slavishly loyal to him. But many were mostly amateurs with no experience in their appointed positions as cabinet heads. The result: incompetent execution of whatever they thought the boss wanted."Affordability" as a promise has been is trashed, but " incompetence" is also rampant, disdained across the partisan divide..https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trumps-approval-hits-new-36-low-fuel-prices-surge-amid-iran-war-reutersipsos-2026-03-24/

 Case in point is the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, a former FOX host, who thinks war is like a video game, and he is carrying out his personal religious crusade. Any military background he had did not prepare him for the position. He claims the military does not need to abide by the Geneva Convention, the avoidance of intentional damage to civilians, and the destruction of their infrastructure. He seems ignorant of the history of this, from Nuremberg to the Balkan wars of the 1990s. If his intent is acted out, he would be committing war crimes we used to condemn other dictators for committing and sent them to The Hague.  His lack of high-level military experience in planning for an attack is glaring, given the anticipated closure of the Straits of Hormuz, yet there was no plan or force ready to deal with it. The military brass and the military forces themselves are doing their job in assigned targeting successes with professionalism and skill that deserve our praise and respect.  That there was no strategy tied to military targeting that would lead to an outcome that met an ever-changing goal was not  Hegseth's fault, except that what he did was, without question, and what he thinks  Trump wanted.  That one lands right on DJT's desk. 

 DHS (Department of Homeland Security) is the most obvious case of incompetence, with one former head, Kristi Noem, who had her personal priorities and wanted to look her best on TV and sound like a tough lady. She had a history of cruelty to animals that apparently carried over to the cruel treatment of immigrants of color and even to US citizens.  Noem managed to turn lemonade into lemons, as public opinion turned from approval of immigration policy to disapproval. She had absolutely no experience in law enforcement. Her priorities were to fund ICE like a militia, a private army, recruiting with messages to appeal to those who were violent thugs. Then she failed to train them or make them abide by the standards of other law enforcement entities. At the end of March, she left DHS with the homeland unprotected from international bad actors by reducing funding for cybersecurity and the TSA, and disaster relief, as we are approaching tornado, wildfires, and hurricane season, and the fallout from the Iran war.  

Noem's replacement is yet to be tested, but he is a former mixed-martial artist who has even made physical threats against fellow members of Congress with whom he disagreed as a way to settle disagreements. President Donald Trump appointed Oklahoma Senator Markwayne Mullin to replace Kristi Noem. Mullin has no direct experience in law enforcement, the military, or federal disaster response

There is no change in priorities or the unstated racist goals of the Trump administration. His only deviation from prior marching orders to Sen. Mullin was to stay out of the headlines. No wonder public opinion shifted from approving Trump's closing of the border and arresting gang members to disapproval of ICE's violent and cruel treatment of migrants to disapproval of ICE's violent and cruel treatment of migrants, as shown in polling.   

With the new head of DHS, there has been no change in an unstated mission and priorities: to kick out as many brown people or put them into gulags as possible, and hunt them down.  Noem's policies are continuing. This mass deportation policy is still executed to the nth degree, regardless of whether the migrant had a criminal record or not. Most deportees had only committed a misdemeanor by not having legal documents, yet they were snatched and put into the black hole of a former warehouse gulag, or put secretly on a charter plane or even on a commercial flight to a country of origin, or to a converted warehouse with no access to lawyers, men, women, and children.  As politicians like to say, "this is not a good look".



Wednesday, March 25, 2026

Gov. Polis: Do not commute Tina Peters sentence for the sake of the integrity of future elections

Gov. Polis: Do not fall for Trump's pressure tactics. Do not commute Tina Peters' sentence or reduce it. It would harm the integrity of future elections. The process by which the state convicted her is not in question, nor is that the biggest issue. Trump et al. think the sentence was too harsh, given that Peters was a sworn supporter of him and obeyed what he had asked clerks to do nationwide instead of their oath to uphold election laws. Election integrity rules must be taken seriously. When clerks break rules and allow an outside partisan to have the code to the electronic system, as Peters did, that is not a trivial matter.  It is a serious one and deserves upholding the laws and rules for the purpose of preventing future partisan-tempted election officials from doing likewise.

To review what Peters did that got her 9 years, go to https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/tina-peters-lawyers-try-to-convince-colorado-court-to-overturn-conviction-for-voting-system-breach

President Trump has repeatedly threatened Colorado with "harsh measures"  demanding the immediate release of Tina Peters. Trump claims Peters is a "political prisoner," prompting actions like targeting state funding, affecting NCAR in Boulder,  SNAP benefits, and relocating Space Command.

All ballots cast in Colorado are manually voted on paper, whether by mail or in person at a polling place.

https://www.cpr.org/2024/10/08/vg-2024-how-your-vote-gets-counted-in-colorado/

Trump is trying to suppress the vote by his self-serving campaign against mail-in ballots, a system Colorado uses that is one of the most secure in the world, so long as those administering it are kept in line by laws we observe and respect.  Mail-in and poll cast ballots filled out manually by the voter and cast on paper are the backup system if a partisan county clerk like Tina Peters succeeds in damaging the integrity of the vote and the vote count.   Votes that are cast on paper ballots, whether by mail or in person, are easily audited, verified, and easily recounted.. The problem is in securing them. 

President Trump has repeatedly threatened Colorado with "harsh measures"  demanding the immediate release of Tina Peters, Trump claims Peters is a "political prisoner," prompting actions like targeting state funding, affecting NCAR in Boulder,  SNAP benefits,and relocating Space Command.


. Paper ballots if kept secure per law and regs, are the way to find whether tinkering has taken place and a double check in a recount. When that system is in the hands of election-denying officials or loyal partisans or owned by them, do not trust AND verify.

Our prior tabulation of mail-in ballots and those cast on election day used by our county was Dominion, and MAGA lost in their attempt to claim they were one of the reasons Trump lost in 2020. MAGA solved that issue by having a Trump partisan buy out Dominion. Our county has now contracted with another system.


Sunday, March 22, 2026

We are no longer a nation that is a political 50-50 split; it is now 60-40 to 58-42 split: advantage Democrats

Common wisdom used to be this was a 50 /50 split in the American voters' opinion polls:..half for the GOP and half for Democrats.  That has shifted to about  58 percent to 60% for Democrats and 42 to 40 percent split in approval for the GOP. This is evident even in the 2025 data,study and it does not reflect the recent shift in Hispanic, independent, and young people's votes away from the GOP and MAGA. Today's polls may reflect the shift.  https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/03/19/donald-trump-approval-rating/89177997007/

https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/54341-worsening-economic-outlook-donald-trump-iran-voting-march-13-16-2026-economist-yougov-poll

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZTtTtR21YM   recent ABC/Washington Post poll

This is a macro view, but it does not apply to every voting district..

 As the GOP loses ground. how much does the loyalty to the MAGA viewpoint play in the GOP. I would have thought it would have been higher than 50%, but that was the finding in a study. https://news.vanderbilt.edu/2025/02/24/majority-of-republicans-nationally-identify-as-maga-for-first-time-in-unity-poll.   The allegiance to MAGA is growing.  Nonetheless, the swing vote within the GOP is still large enough to make any rift significant.,  That does not mean it automatically translates into political power loss.  

 Support for one or the other side of this voter poll split is also specific to location and the number of Congressional districts, states, or electoral college votes, voting districts that have a record, demographic, and dominance of one side of the divide or another. What it does show is that whatever is considered a swing or near swing district will still determine outcome in both November 2026 midterms and in the 2028 presidential race..  The rest of the voting districts are set in concrete. The electoral college laws are also responsible for this imbalance, which has resulted in nearly every presidential election showing a larger popular vote for Democrats than the winning GOP candidate. The advantage favors the GOP, and Democrats must outperform them with the popular vote. Not every voter who contributed to the 60% non Trump vote wlll vote for Democrats. They could opt to stay at home on election day.

Three factors may influence the remainder of the year. GOP/Trump policies that threaten previous Hispanic voters with ICE cruelty, the struggles of young people saddled with student debt, and AI as an entry-level job opportunity killer. The other is voter suppression of perceived opponent groups:, ICE agents at polling places, and making it difficult for those who are large numbers unfriendly to the GOP, particularly women, such as the SAVE act attempts to do.  Disillusionment by independents and non-MAGA with Trump's promises and failures to make good on them is a third.  This one may be growing thanks to his damage to affordability and entanglement in foreign wars, such as Iran.

The SAVE Act is now being debated in the Senate and is predicted to go down in defeat, even if Trump vetoes the version that survives and needs a 60-vote count to override his veto. Senators, even in some safe states, are not sure who will be hurt more: women or their own, poorer, undereducated rural  White voter base.

The current version of the SAVE proposal makes it hard for those they see as their opponents to vote, but it has a serious backfire in it that makes even GOP Senators uneasy unless they come from ruby red states. The SAVE Act places a burden on women that most men do not have. It requires many women to jump through additional hoops in order to be able to vote. Married or divorced women have to tie their accepted picture ID to their birth certificate to make name changes via marriage or other situations. This will certainly hurt Democrats, but that also will hurt the MAGA base, which is mostly rural, poor, White,  working class, and with low education levels, because they too have to cough up money to get the right photo ID and the accepted documentation of their birth and make it through those administrative hurdles. Elderly in both parties will be hurt, but less in blue higher-income states because they are more likely to have a US passport, which is accepted proof of citizenship/and name conformity. Elderly voters usually trend heavily toward the GOP.  Because of the cost involved in getting a certified birth certificate, passports, or a conforming ID, this can be seen as an unconstitutional poll tax, but that will have to play out in the courts.

Why pick on the women voters anyway?

Today, a 56% majority of women identify as Democrats or lean Democratic, while 37% affiliate with or lean toward the GOP. up 4 percentage points since 2015 and is at one of its highest points since 1992. Among men, there has been less recent change: 48% of men identify with the GOP, and 44% are Democrats or lean Democratic, a long-standing divide. Both gender and educational gaps are expanding.  https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/03/20/wide-gender-gap-growing-educational-divide-in-voters-party-identification/






Sunday, March 15, 2026

Trump's war on press freedom as it consolidates media control of news broadcasting and Stars and Stripes


Two very disturbing stories today from the Trump administration that contain threats to freedom of the press:. One, the FCC chair threatens to yank broadcast licenses from outlets that do not report favorably about Trump on Iran, and the other is from the Pentagon, which is cracking down on the independent military publication, Stars and Stripes, by denying reporters' access because it is "too woke".  Both of these are attempts by a wannabe dictatorship to control minds and the information the public can access to formulate their own opinions.  It is another sign of a dictatorship consolidating power by mind and information control

 Imagine if all the news the public gets is the spin that only reports favorable news to the regime. That is precisely how dictators in our modern era seize and stay in control. The prime example is Viktor Orbán of Hungary, who slowly suppressed the press and put control of the media in the hands of cronies, through denial of licensing and with buyouts.  Imagine if every news outlet sounded like FOX.  The administration is well on its way toward that goal, with its control over CBS News and now a buyout that will destroy CNN's independence.  The intent of the Trump regime is to defang CNN as the secretary of "war" just said: Pentagon chief says he's eager for Trump ally to buy CNN as he blasts war coverage | Reuters

FCC chair threatens to revoke broadcasters' licenses amid Trump comments on Iran coverage

Pentagon tightens controls over Stars and Stripes after calling it “woke” : NPR

The politics behind the $8B Paramount-Skydance merger | PBS News

Controversial '60 Minutes' segment on Trump immigration policy leaks online | PBS News

MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: Iran: Hegseth's holy war?




 

Saturday, March 14, 2026

SAVE us from the SAVE act

 SAVE us from SAVE: The radical piece of legislation before the Senate would have at least three particularly obnoxious provisions designed to keep certain groups of people from voting, or would require extraordinary efforts and money to prove citizenship. Particularly harmed by the requirement to provide citizenship would be married women, the poor, and seniors who do not have passports or cannot find or get certified copies of birth certificates, divorce, and name change papers so they match driver's licenses with a photo. ID.. It would expose personal data now held by separate states to partisan centralized federal officials, for suppression targeting methods and dirty tricks,

he motivation for this piece of legislation is not to enhance vote integrity but to give the advantage to the GOP in the midterms. Trump has admitted that. https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2026/03/09/congress/trump-save-america-act-gop-00819673.

Their whole premise is built on a lie that illegals voted and caused Trump to lose in 2020, for which no evidence has ever been found. https://www.cato.org/commentary/rights-bogus-claims-about-noncitizen-voting-fraud#:~:text=If%20you%20believe%20Elon%20Musk%2C,5%2C%20%E2%80%9Cthey%20are%20importing%20votertrutrum;ians.


Another excuse Trump likes to make for his loss in 2020 was that there was extensive fraud in mail-in ballots. Therefore,  his answer: only ballots received by election day should be counted...cutting out most active miliary votes or subject to the whims of the postal delivery service. Some states would have to change their already existing rules and laws to conform.  In fact, a study taken exposes Trump's claim as BS and I cannot find any evidence to the contrary.  https://www.brookings.edu/articles/mail-voting-in-the-us-data-points-to-very-low-fraud-and-significant-benefits-to-voters/

More on the SAVE attack on voters' ability to vote:

1) It would keep married women from voting if their ID does not match their birth certificate names or even passport names. (estimated 50percent of voters do not have passports). What does your driver's license have as your photo ID name? Divorce papers would also have to be produced, or legal documentation of name changes would have to be provided.

2) All of your personal information, driver's licenses, social security numbers, and personal data held by State officials would have to be handed over to the Department of Homeland Security as they search first for registered illegals, turn out ICE to "protect" their own voting interests at polling places,, and God knows whatelse it could be used for if say a dictator who may not be one you supports takes over now or in the future.

3) This federalization enables big brother government to manipulate elections to suit the outcome they want by giving them the tools to identify targeting groups or kinds of legal voters that may not support them by voting roll purges and other strategies. The beauty of the current state control of such information is that 50 states can control their data instead of one federal government, in the hands of a party or single strong leader, being able to affect the outcome and votes in elections.

.
The premise used to rationalize this legislation is stopping illegals from voting, a line MAGA has swallowed whole without any thought or care about evidence. For over 6 years, proof of the"steal" of the 2020 vote has been investigated, rejected by courts and hearings, and never proved. It is still just a theory to excuse a loss or a suspicion. Never mind, keeping certain voters from voting is a political strategy that MAGA embraces because they see a political advantage for them in the midterms. Heads up MAGA. You may not always be in control of the Oval Office, Congress, or the judiciary. What happens if the shoe is on the other foot, and the people you consider to be political enemies are now in power?

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/03/the-key-to-protecting-fair-and-free.html

Monday, March 9, 2026

The key to protecting fair and free elections. What works.


 We all have our political priorities, and mine is fundamental. As a former election official myself, number one on my list is the preservation of free and fair elections, and Donald Trump is enemy number one with an attempt to "federalize elections" and to keep his enemies from voting by putting up all kinds of barriers. Those include banning mail-in balloting and "show me your papers" citizenship requirements. Not everyone can afford a passport or can produce a birth certificate, given the cost, ability, and time required. We do not have a national ID card. This is a movement Trump is promoting nationwide, and it is all based on the premise that the reason he lost the election is that illegals voted. FYI. There has never been any proof produced of the extent of such fraud that would change any outcome, and there is a trail of court cases wth judges that came to the same conclusion. Trump has fooled his faithful followers into willfully believing him. Now, using the same pretext, Trump is attempting to grab election registration details from states, such as Georgia and now Arizona, in an attempt to find a shred of evidence or, worse, to justify an attempt to selectively disqualify voters whom he objects. He is currently engaged in getting "election deniers" in every critical election official position he can so he can perpetuate his deception of the "steal" and control outcomes.

Trump's claim that widespread fraud in mail-in balloting so it needs to be curtailed is also based on BS. There is evidence that there is so little fraud that election resiults were not impacted.. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/mail-voting-in-the-us-data-points-to-very-low-fraud-and-significant-benefits-to-voters/

MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: How Trump plans to subvert the midterms: it is no secret

Trump says he won't sign any bills until SAVE America Act passes

MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: Trump wants to GOP nationalize elections and control the vote count: that's what dictators do

MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: SAVE us from the SAVE act

In Colorado, where mail-in voting is the overwhelmingly popular method of voting even when polling places are available, we are a testament to how well mail-in voting works in modern tech society. With computerization, illegal voting is virtually nonexistent because it is possible to cross-check various databases to determine eligibility for registration, as well as being a legitimate voter. There are two critical positions in Colorado government firmly supported and ably protected that keep our voting systems fair and free: the Secretary of State and the Attorney General. Both are ably and dedicated and deserve our recognition for their work: Secretary of State Jena Griswold and Attorney General Phil Weiser. It is key that whoever fills those positions is the most knowledgeable, experienced, and able to continue their priorities with the same knowledge, technical ability, and dedication.

Friday, March 6, 2026

Iran: Hegseth's holy war?

 Is the US being led into Iran war by a religious radical who sees this as a holy war?  In a scary vein is Pete Hegseth head of the Department of "War".  His view of Christianity is of the crusades and he sees life in terms of this. If he sees Iran as a holy war, we should be more than concerned.. Rationality is out the window.

 It's Pete Hegseth's theology that ought to concern us – Baptist News Global

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/03/us-israel-iran-war-christian-rhetoric

From the Guardian: "US military commanders have been invoking extremist Christian rhetoric about biblical “end times” to justify involvement in the Iran war, to troops.....The Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) says it has received more than 200 complaints from service members across all branches of the armed forces."

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2026/02/white-christian-nationalism-has-taken.htmlWhat 

to know about the archconservative church Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth attends | PBS News


Chasing the story, CNN: Analysis: Pete Hegseth wanted an ‘American Crusade.’ Now he’s leading a war in the Middle East |


Update: 3/17/2026

 CNN Politicshttps://www.cnn.com/2026/03/17/politics/joe-kent-resigns-iran-war

Do two lies work? Why not, DJT? I am listening to Trump claiming Iran was an imminent nuclear threat to the US. No one I can find other than perhaps Israel or the Saudis, thinks so. But he can use the lie to make another lie and pull out with mission accomplished. The lie he can use, we wiped out their navy, their army, their air force, no radar, no anti-aircraft, their nuclear sites..(and we keep killing their head guys. That is what regime change means????). Is that what he is trying to claim.. If true...then quit. The imminent threat is ended. Right?.. But whatever lies he makes to end this war he started with a lie are tools he can use..Lies are his stock in trade and his loyal MAGA will just say Amen.
Timing is everything: when his own base splits over isolation and affordability so much he looks weak,, then watch him declare victory, and quit. Then...if Iran keeps Hormuz closed and keeps lobbing drones at the Arab gulf states, what then?

Trump is not even a good checkers player...he only understands one move at a time, and ignores his opponents' future retaliatory moves.. Even two-dimensional checkers are beyond him.


Thursday, March 5, 2026

James Talarico's victory in the Texas primary may signal the rising of moral outrage

Talarico speaks the language of many Texans, which may puzzle those not from the South, as I see the media dominated and housed on the East Coast try to explain why he won. For those who were raised inthe "bible belt" or came of age in the evangelical Christian movements that dominate the culture of the South, it is not hard to understand. (I am a native of Eastern Oklahoma) 

Talarico speaks their language, a language that comes naturally to him as the grandson of a Baptist preacher and now a Presbyterian pastor/seminarian. He cites the words of Jesus freely: to love God with all his heart and love his neighbors as he would love himself. He shares much with the theology of Pope Leo.   He also puts his economic populist message into theological references, caring for the least of these or Jesus overturning the money changers' tables in the Temple.

 Talarico is the antidote to a political movement based on fear and loathing of neighbors who are not like them, in race, sometimes in religion, and in culture,  and/or who worship wealth as the sign of success as persons.  He simply quietly incorporates his political beliefs without raising his voice or delivering a proselytizing, fiery sermon. In subtle ways, he preaches without being preachy. 

 Democrats can hope there are enough in Texas in the general election in November who are troubled by the immorality of the president and his staff and administrators seeking more political power by inhumane treatment of anyone brown speaking Spanish, snatched and warehoused until they can prove their legality, in an attempt to purge this country of as many brown people as they can. They have convinced so many who claim to be Christian by the righteousness of racial hatred that I wonder how many are left in the South who are uncomfortable with that approach and are indeed swayed by a view of Christianity of Talarico's that is the polar opposite of the tone of others in the White House.

This may also show a meeting of minds of both Christians and northern liberals when morality and human rights, and economic populism, find common cause. It is where disgust with the immorality of  Epstein and his clients and affordability meet in a common purpose.

MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: White Christian Nationalism has taken over the White House

From last July, MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: Messaging again: a new messenger who speaks to many in red states: James Talarico

MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: Moral indignation rises as a major imperative of anti-ICE protests

In 25-Country Survey, Americans Especially Likely To View Fellow Citizens as Morally Bad | Pew Research Center

An interesting poll:


David Brooks posed the question and gave a thoughtful answer in the Atlantic. He did it without mentioning the role of organized religion, diminished but still strong in mostly the South. Religion used to set the standards for what was moral or not.  Religion has become a powerful political tool, particularly for the political right. However, Talarico has turned that on its head by showing that Christianity is in harmony with the political left. Texas may be a special case where Hispanics are a very large population; social liberals but religious conservatives, and Pope Leo and Talarico have been on the same page on ICE issues. It may still resonate in other southern states, even those without large Hispanic minorities. Stay tuned.

Why Do So Many People Think Trump Is Good? - The Atlantic

  

Tuesday, February 24, 2026

Fed Ex sues the government over tariffs: will it ever help consumers?

I am a small business importer of cosmetics from the European Union, and I am not a customer of FedEx, but I approve its action. FedEx sues for refund of Trump tariffs after Supreme Court ruling It is only a first step, and there are lots of possibilities that there are no further steps. The public may snort that " this will only line FedEx's pocket and consumers will never see a dime" needs some fine-tuning, but it is more likely than not, particularly if small businesses are involved. Congress can pass some laws to bring some sense to the process, but not in time to do much good, and those corporations with deep pockets will be there in the lobby looking after their own corporate interests. (Around 60% of Amazon's sellers are small businesses.)

Trump's tariffs get knocked out - but the hit to small business is just beginning | Morningstar

To understand how it works with my contracted US-based import transportation shipping company is that it is, well, complicated, but while consumer relief is not a hopeless exercise, it is close to it.   Don't hold your breath.  

Here is what I have experienced, and I do not know if FedEx works the same way, but it probably does.  However, probably the power is in FedEx's own company broker's hands if small businesses are handled the same way by any of the other import shippers.(UPS, DHL). Big volume importers can afford their own brokers. If they are very big, they ship containers full, which goes through a different process.

 We, as small businesses, do not have DC lobbyists, upfront containers full, or funds to sue FedEx if they win their suit, and if they choose to keep the proceeds and do not pass them on to us or to consumers.  We, the importers, have to pay the tariffs up front to the shipper/broker before we even have our product in hand to sell it, compete in the marketplace, and generate revenue to pay the import bill, the manufacturer, and operating expenses.   That is why many small businesses have had to close their doors.

Once the manufacturer from which  I order their products is ready to ship, they call the company that provides the best or only service to pick up the goods and transport them to the US. Since the imposition of tariffs on Liberation Day, in advance of their landing in the US, the transportation company's small package brokerage is in charge and declares the amount of tariffs and administration fees they will charge us, the receiver/importer. They demand payment based on their own interpretation of the various rules, executive orders, and laws right up front.  Given the fact that the products we import are shipped by air and are small packages (we do not do containers full), we have little or no chance to protest the import fees and duties, and either refuse the shipment and return it to Europe, or take it on the chin. The shipping company, in the meantime, has its own brokerage operation to levy its fees and duties (tariffs) and then hands the whole shipment off to the actual US customs officials, who then rarely disagree with the brokerage. As with cosmetics, the Food and Drug Administration officials housed near customs also make sure labeling and content comply with US rules, regulations, and laws. If we clear both, they may be released to be delivered to our place of business by the shipping company's local trucks. The whole chain of delivery, at best, if shipped by air, takes a week from the time the order is picked up at the European manufacturer's factory until I actually get it at my doorstep. I have had some shipments take a month.  I still must pay what the transportation brokerage department rules are due before they will leave with me or refuse the delivery and ship it back to Europe, because the fees are outrageously wrong.  I then distribute the product to Amazon, my retail customers, or fill internet orders myself on a platform like Shopify, hoping and planning to charge enough for the new duties and fees that have been added to my costs of doing business.  If we disagree with the shipper's brokerage, we can "dispute" the charges for duty as being wrong.  We have had disputes unresolved since last fall, so lots of luck with that. 

The problem we as small businesses, have encountered is even keeping up with Trump's ever-changing deals and executive orders, and the other is access to the breakdown of what the shipping brokerage has based their tariff charges on.  There appears to be little consistency on the part of the brokerage agent in giving their best guess of what the chaos and constant changes are on any particular day.  This chaos is a major challenge. 

 In any case, the transportation shipper brokerage knows what they ruled and charged and sent to US Customs and how much money they collected from us, the receiver and importer, in their own paper trail, which they pass on to the US government. The shipper broker keeps what they get from up front as a fee for the service..  These shipper brokers are then in a position to claim a refund from the Trump administration.   At that point, if the courts approve the refund to FedEx, FedEx can choose to refund part of what they have charged us, the importer, for the courts to rule on which parts of the tariff charges are illegal duty assessments in general. If say FedEX decides to part with some of the court award and pass it on to us, then we, as the importer, can then decide whether to lower our wholesale and retail prices or keep the change to cover the past up-front costs.  At that point, the competition and the free market rule. If we cannot compete at the price we need to cover expenses or make any profit, we close our doors, too.

 In any case, the small business importer like us has to pay all upfront in duty and tariffs (same thing) and pray that the brokerage is also correct, or dispute their charges, or return the shipment, or go out of business with no products to sell. So far we have hung in there, but our otherwise successful business has been harmed and impacted by the chaos of Trump's tariff obsession

I think we have just begun to see the impact of tariffs on consumer prices. Until now, big companies importing by the container or like cars, will have worked their way through their 2025 inventory and now are reordering for 2026 projections...and these for sure will reflect the price hikes. 90% of tariffs get passed on to consumers.
That Trump thinks tariffs would take the place of income tax is nuts: The only people benefitting from this would be those rich enough to not care; the rest of us on a budget would realize that such tariffs are as regressive as sales tax...which mean everyone pays the same but even small change or more hits those who are counting pennies proportionate to their income the most. The poor and middle class would be screwed.

MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: The Supreme Court ruling on tariffs today? Consumers see a partial relief

Automakers could start raising prices this year to offset tariffs, dealership executive says | Watch

White Christian Nationalism has taken over the White House

As Trump proclaims, the separation of church and state is over ("forget the separation of church and state"), what takes its place in the White House? It appears it is White Christian Nationalism, if not in words, at least in deed.  Its actions that clearly target cleansing the US of as many brown people as they can are clearly racist as well as political.  Tactics used are not Christian, based upon hatred and fear of neighbors not like you, and treating people cruelly are not either.  Trump is not noted for his devotion to the teachings of Christ, but his history of racism is a theme throughout his public life.  The two, white Christian Nationalism and racism, have found a home in the White House.  The shaper of the inhumane treatment of migrants from south of the border, the person setting the the goals for the warehousing of brown people caught in the dragnet of ICE (put them all in concentration camps if they look brown and speak Spanish, then figure out which ones get deported while depriving the imprisoned of legal representation), is looking more and more like Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff.  His background also reeks of White Christian Nationalism. 

Update: 3/6/2026  Is the US being led into Iran war by a religious radical who sees this as a holy war?  In a scary vein is Pete Hegseth head of the Department of "War".  His view of Christianity is of the crusades and he sees life in terms of this. If he sees Iran as a holy war, we should be more than concerned.. Rationality is out the window.

 It's Pete Hegseth's theology that ought to concern us – Baptist News Global

What to know about the archconservative church Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth attends | PBS News

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/03/us-israel-iran-war-christian-rhetoric


From my prior posting on this blog:

The real shame is that so many Americans share or tolerate (Trump's)racism.
The other shame is that his racist whisperer is in his ear daily and given a permission slip to proceed. Stephen Miller, on his staff has a long history of white nationalism. If anything, Miller's contribution to the Trump regime is his anti-immigrant stance, including using the cruelty of family separation as a tool and in deporting immigrants without due process. He is viewed as an extremist in these sensitive matters. Given his anti-immigrant reputation, I doubt that the Bill of Rights and the civil rights-related amendments would be high on his required list of curriculum topics. The Southern Poverty Law Center tags him as an extremist.https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/stephen-miller/. Miller is in charge of this ICE project aimed at ridding the country of as many brown people as he can under the pretext that migrants are criminals when 70 percent of those they grab have no criminal record.. ..but are brown and are both American citizens and who only committed a misdemeanor of being undocumented. Miller's campaign involves eliminating the birthright citizenship of those born in the US and cleansing them from this country.

The irony is that not all Christians buy into this ideology of White Christian Nationalism, particularly the Catholic Church and the Council of Bishops. Almost all of those victims of ICE's dragnet and cruel warehousing are Catholics. In addition, a large array of Protestant churches that are not part of the "evangelical movement" have had members actively participating in opposing ICE actions, including Presbyterians, Methodists, Unitarians, and others. Their motivations are not legalistic, but moral, religious, and being humane to their neighbors. They have moved the more popular description of migrants promoted by Donald Trump himself from "murderers and rapists" to "neighbors" in the Biblical sense. Good Samaritans have taken the place of racists and nationalists in many minds.


Trump said “forget about separation of church and state." He meant it.

Christian leaders denounce Trump actions, warn of 'crisis of faith'

“The Thought of Holding Thousands of Families in Massive Warehouses Should Challenge the Conscience of Every American,” Says Bishop Cahill | USCCB

MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: I fear white supremacy has raised its ugly head again.

One of the most puzzling aspects about those who are completely devoted to Trump the leader is that some feel a religious zeal to see him as a second coming, or a Christ-like figure:  While none of us is free from sin, not all sins are the same. Some are worse than others, and the early Catholic church came up with a list we also call "the seven deadly sins". Dante wrote a classic about it.  It's as good today as it was then as a starting point to rate the personal relative morality of ourselves or others. There might be a better role model out there. Per our friend at AI google: here they are:"They are considered root sins that lead to other immoral actions, consisting of pride, envy, wrath, sloth, greed, lust, and gluttony.

Here is the list of the seven deadly sins with their definitions:
  • Pride (Hubris): Considered the original and most serious sin, it is an excessive belief in one's own abilities and a sense of superiority over others.
  • Greed (Avarice): An excessive desire for material possessions, wealth, or gain.
  • Lust: An intense, uncontrolled longing or craving, particularly for sexual pleasure.
  • Envy: The desire to possess what someone else has, coupled with sadness or resentment at their good fortune.
  • Gluttony: The overindulgence or excessive consumption of food, drink, or other items to the point of waste.
  • Wrath (Anger): Uncontrolled feelings of hatred, rage, and animosity, often leading to a desire for vengeance.
  • Sloth: Extreme laziness, apathy, or the failure to utilize one's talents and act upon103 duties.