Showing posts with label mental health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mental health. Show all posts

Saturday, July 13, 2024

Both pass cognitive tests;: Trump has additional mental health issues


(Update: July 16, 2024: My word to those claiming either is too old: I am older than either Trump or Bden.. Given modern medicine, bodies and minds age at different rates in humans. My word to those who try to disqualify either because of age: Shut up. Biden has more than demonstrated since the debate that was an episode, not a condition.

Trump has had his moments as well. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-confuses-nikki-haley-pelosi-talking-jan-6-rcna134863) When the teleprompter fails, he has been seen and heard to go off on sharks, electric boats, and, whether others call gibberish and word salads. )

Trump also often deflects criticism of him by accusing his critic of doing what he himself does. The trick is called projection. It can also be an unconscious reaction.   https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/24/opinions/trumps-absurd-projection-reveals-his-anxiety-avlon/index.html?

The most glaring example of Trump's projection complex:  Democrats cheated n 2020 elecito (no evidence ever emerged after 3 years) , the big lie, and now Trump and MAGA plan to cheat in 2024, as revealed by Project 2025 and the strategy revealed by the Heritage Foundation.



Both Trump and Biden pass cognitive tests: Trump has additional mental health issues. I am listening to some comments about Biden, his impressive performance at the NATO presser, and his mental acuity. One of the strangest was, well, he showed great acuity when he talked about foreign policy but not when he talked about his own health. Come on....either he has sufficient acuity in his brain, or he doesn't. There may be other matters at work here...like he is getting attacked because of his age. How does acuity disappear or appear given the topic?   

 So, explain this:  https://www.npr.org/2024/07/12/nx-s1-5036518/biden-trump-poll

"The race for the presidency remains statistically tied despite President Biden’s dismal debate performance two weeks ago, a new national NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll finds.

"Biden actually gained a point since last month’s survey, which was taken before the debate. In this poll, he leads Trump 50% to 48% in a head-to-head matchup. But Biden slips when third-party options are introduced, with Trump holding the slightest advantage with 43% to 42%."    

Trump has had his moments when the teleprompter fails, wandering off about sharks, electric boats, and what othesr call gibberish and word salads.  https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-confuses-nikki-haley-pelosi-talking-jan-6-rcna134863

Where MAGA goes wrong with cognitive tests is that most Biden voters know he has a speech stutter, makes gaffes, and is old, and that is nothing new. They already support him because he represents more than himself: stopping Trump. They realize Trump's problem is mental health, not cognitive health. Only the media and some ambitious politicians seem to be shocked. In short, they already discount his vulnerabilities and support him https://www.cnn.com/.../donald-trump-criticism.../index.html anyway.

Former White House chief of staff tells friends that Trump ‘is the most flawed person’ he’s ever met | CNN Politics
CNN.COM
Former White House chief of staff tells friends that Trump ‘is the most flawed person’ he’s ever met | CNN Politics
Former White House chief of staff tells friends that Trump ‘is the most flawed person’ he’s ever met | CNN Politics

Felicia Muftic
So far, he has been tagged by professional psychologists as a narcissistic psychopath. For those who understand choices, understand the alternative and the consequences:. A narcissistic sociopath with his finger on the nuclear bomb who can't tell a dangerous and aggressive adversary from his role models
NYT editorial board calls Trump 'unfit to lead'
POLITICO.COM
NYT editorial board calls Trump 'unfit to lead'

Wednesday, March 29, 2023

Nashville shooting: My reaction is deeply personal for a reason.

 Once again, it happened. The Nashville shooting: My reaction is deeply personal and close to home.

A person armed with assault rifles (two of them bought legally) crashed a school in Nashville and killed three kids, their teacher, the headmaster, and the school custodian. Once again, some political leaders failed us.

"We aren't gonna fix it" was the response of a Tennessee Congressman to the Nashville shooting. "We have a mental health problem", he says, so fix that. What needs to be fixed is congresspeople like him by voting his fellow travelers out. Another Congressman representing the Covenant school district, bemoaning the killing, claimed there is nothing we can do about it. How dumb do they think people are? Unless the easy access to weapons of war is fixed or truly effective red flag laws are enacted, the mentally balanced will always be able to act out their fantasies, even if they are already under the care of a mental health professional...and many, particularly younger ones, are not. That is the lesson from Nashville where the shooter did not fool the mental health professional but did fool his parents and had the legal ability to buy seven weapons. .

And, yes, there is a mental health issue. Even when dangerous potential shooters with mental health problems had been identified an effective mechanism was not in place to prevent them from getting hold of weapons or carrying out their intent. Mental health problems had been identified by parents, administrators, and professionals in Nashville, in Boulder Colorado King Soopers, in the suburban school where my granddaughter cowered in the closet next to the room with the shooter, in the Aurora Colorado theater massacre shooter, and even in New Town and Nashville. There are policies that are ineffective to stop known potential problem individuals, that coddle dangerous students with known mental health threats. Red flag laws difficult to use, easy access to weapons, unwise problem student plans, are not enough. We may never stop all shooters with mental health problems, but we can save many lives if we address these things.
Let us also not kid ourselves about mental health. Parents can be fooled, and even professionals may miss the extent of the murderous intent. Both the Louisville bank shooter and the Nashville shooter bought assault rifles legally, even though professionals and their parents knew they were having mental health issues. The Aurora theater shooter in Colorado was already under a professional's care, and she had spotted how dangerous he was, but reporting it to upstream officials did no good as they ignored her warning, prompting revised red flag procedures after the fact of the slaughter.. Unless assault rifles are taken off the shelves, red flag laws are made more effective, smart wannabe death by cops and future mass shooters will still slip through the cracks, fooling professionals and parents alike. A clinical psychologist I asked about that. Even if the person is in the care of a professional, there is a 50-50 chance they will identify a potential killer, she told me. This is the line still used to divert attention from any solution the gun rights zealots oppose and even now (update 4/15/2023) Donald Trump is using to deflect us from some hard facts that mental health initiatives are not enough. Everything Trump Said About Mass Shootings in NRA Speech (newsweek.com)

We need to stop the shrugging it off, the lying, the stonewalling of legislation, the promotion of weapons of war in the hands of civilians, and the pious opining there is nothing we can do. Mental health is the problem so these things will happen, they say. The assault gun-promoting congressperson from the Nashville district of the Covenant School. said he was heartbroken and thanked the cops who got to the school in 14 minutes and took down the killer. At least that. Now, Mr. Congressman, do something about it. So, Congressman cut out the sad shrug, stop lying about the 2nd Amendment, his personal promotion of assault weapon ownership, and put kids first over his own self-centered irresponsible obsessions. His fellow apologists said there is nothing we can do. Some even had the gall after Uvalde to say we just have to live with this. Sick. Sick. Sick. Their interpretation of the Constitution is not even supported by Supreme Court jurists. in the Heller decision. . That same Nashville Congressman and his family promoted their interpretations of the second amendment even on a Christmas card assault-weapon-toting family photo just like Colorado's Rep. Lauren Boebert did. Sick. Sick. Sick. The ball is now in Congress' court dominated by shruggers and assault weapon gun lovers. It will not change until their voters act.

In the wake of East High school shootings, the Colorado state legislature worked to pass a couple of gun safety bills in March> Colorado legislature works through the weekend to advance two major gun laws (koaa.com)  State by-state action is helpful, assuming the wannabe mass killer does not take a quick jaunt to a nearby state.   Colorado is surrounded by many states with more lax laws.  For that reason, the issue needs to be addressed on the federal level, too, by Congress.  For citations of existing gun safety laws in Colorado: Firearm Legislation, Rules and Statutes | Colorado Bureau of Investigation    Can states pass such laws without violating Heller? Yes. 2nd Amendment rights are not unlimited: We could go on for days debating the right of individuals to own weapons of war. The issue has not been resolved, though the majority of the public favors banning them as we have before the ban was sunsetted and not renewed. Thereafter, mass shootings involved more than 4 because of the ability to kill so many in such a short time before there could be any intervention. Citing English common law to say that a person has an absolute right to have such weapons is interesting, but the operative decision here and now is the Heller 5-4 decision on the supreme court. It involved handguns and a too-restrictive law rendering their use useless for either the ability to be part of a militia if needed (police officer for example) and for self-protection and protection of a person's home. Yes, it did establish an individual person who did not belong to a well-regulated militia could keep a handgun for the defense of their home (FYI..I comply and agree). However, the right is not unrestricted; there can be restrictions. I am no lawyer, but this analysis was found on the U of Connecticut law school site." The Second Amendment right is not absolute and a wide range of gun control laws remain “presumptively lawful,” according to the Court. These include laws that (1) prohibit carrying concealed weapons, (2) prohibit gun possession by felons or the mentally retarded, (3) prohibit carrying firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, (4) impose “conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms,” (5) prohibit “dangerous and unusual weapons,” and (6) regulate firearm storage to prevent accidents. Justice Scalia wrote the majority opinion. He was joined by Justices Alito, Kennedy, Roberts, and Thomas.

Justices Stevens and Breyer filed separate dissenting opinions. Stevens asserts that the Second Amendment (1) protects the individual right to bear arms only in the context of military service and (2) does not limit the government's authority to regulate civilian use or possession of firearms. He describes the majority's individual-right holding as “strained and unpersuasive”; its conclusion, “overwrought and novel.” Stevens was joined in his dissent by Justices Breyer, Ginsberg, and Souter." https://www.cga.ct.gov/2008/rpt/2008-r-0578.htm

For state by state maps, search Bing for gun safety laws, where I found many.

Know the symptoms: advice for non-professionals for what signs to look for potential... killers  Know The Signs: You Can Prevent Gun Violence and Other Harmful Acts — Sandy Hook Promise

https://www.vice.com/en/article/a35mya/nearly-all-mass-shooters-since-1966-have-had-four-things-in-common

c

I am a grandmother of one grandchild who survived the school shooting in Colorado. She will be haunted by the memory of that moment for the rest of her life, the same as all survivors of such mass shootings. What about their mental health? https://siepr.stanford.edu/publications/health/surviving-school-shooting-impacts-mental-health-education-and-earnings-american The armed community relations cop responded, and the shooter shot himself next to the room where she was hiding and before more were killed. She heard it all and was in the last classroom to be cleared and her horror-stricken mother waited in the reunification place. A grandson huddled under his desk for a morning in a neighboring school to New Town/Sandy Hook, Connecticut.
In a Denver suburb, the first and iconic school shooting, Columbine happened, and many kids were killed as cops feared to enter. Not all school shooting involved weapons of war, and sometimes cowardice or lack of training of law enforcement permit a slaughter to continue. In Nashville and Ulvalde, the shooter used these weapons of war. There a more examples of this. The history of the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994 : NPR Even in Nashville, 6 were killed before the police took the shooter down 14 minutes after the first 911 call came in. In Uvalde a slaughter of kids continued as the cops cowered outside the door, fearing they were unable to take out a well-armed shooter. In a Denver's East High School this month, two administrators were shot (survived), as they tried to unarm a student. The reason untrained civilians had to perform the dangerous maneuver was because armed community relations officers had been withdrawn from all Denver schools recently (a decision that was reversed immediately). In the 1980's as Denver city clerk I sat in on a city council debate restricting the sale of large ammunition clips and hollow bullets as outgunned cops fought open warfare with gangs. The issues are that old and that new even in a state as blue as mine.
Let us start with saluting the hero cops and helping police become the heroes they are. Then, let us cut out this shrugging and handwringing. Let us stop hiding behind a misreading of second amendment rights (that protects only a well-regulated militia's right to bear arms), get the CRO's back in school, and get the sales of weapons of war banned.

Tuesday, May 31, 2022

Blaming Uvalde on lack of mental health services is a deflection needing serious correction

As expected, most in the GOP, but not all,  and Abbott in the thrall of the NRA and anti sensible gun law fanatics, blamed the lack of mental health care for Uvalde. The two Texas Senators, however, differed. Cruz rails against gun regulation while Cornyn leads GOP in negotiations | The Texas Tribune  Gov. Abbott had just cut $211 million in funding for mental health in Texas before the mass shooting, as well. What a two-faced pol he is.  Blaming the lack of mental health services and cutting funding for such services is standard practice for those politicians in denial of their responsibilities, a ruse, a tactic, a ploy, a tool,  to deflect any consideration from sensible gun laws. It is like wallpapering over a stained rotten wall. It makes it look better but does little to fix the real problem.  Better mental health services is always a good thing, but it is not an honest answer in this case.  Here is why. Excerpts  from my prior postings:  Also see a prior post:https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2022/05/i-am-sick-and-tired-of-gun-lobby.html

May 25, 2022 Better mental health services mean little without red flag laws and even then,  it is iffy. Over the past years, I have written columns after Columbine, Aurora, and other mass killings.  That professionals can spot a future mass killer assumes the killer even had visited a mental health professional, but when they do, there is a 50-50 chance even a trained pro can predict the patient will act out.  Even then,  what motivates a mass killer may not be an identified diagnosis.  That 18-year-olds have a record of prior violence or a visit to a psychologist is rare.  Uncontrolled anger is technically not a mental health disease, so red flag laws need to be broader than just a diagnosis of paranoia or some other formal diagnosis of a recognized illness.  Those of us who have had to raise teenagers also know that even after 18 years old, few can control themselves and avoid risky behavior.. Their brains, especially young males, have not matured yet to be wired to be rational. The assumption needs to be all under 21 are a potential risk.  At the minimum, if there is no ban of assault-type weapons of war, the age should be raised to 21.  Some states have done that, but a neighboring state may not which is why the approach needs to be federal.  If such laws had been in effect in Texas, chances are Uvalde would not have happened since the shooter was just 18, no red flags, and no record of a personality out of control that we know of so far.  

In a 2012 posting:
in the wake of the Aurora Colorado theatre shooting, the shooter had been under the care of a psychiatrist who did flag him, but restrictions kept anyone from acting. My psychologist friends (I am a supporter of mental health system improvements and access to counseling through a faith-based organization) tell me even then they have only a 50-50 chance of predicting which of their patients will carry out mass shootings or kill someone. Mental health is a factor, but in courts of law, the insanity plea is rarely successful. Should we improve our mental health services? Yes. Every little bit will help, but it is not a panacea or even a major deterrent. Without red flag laws permitting reporting of people may be a threat and without universal background checks, improved mental health access still hamstrings the ability for mental health professionals to prevent mass killings.
http://bigthink.com/risk-reason-and-reality/the-supreme-court-ruling-on-the-2nd-amendment-did-not-grant-an-unlimited-right-to-own-guns
Abbott blames 'mental health' for Uvalde shooting after cutting $211 million from mental health agency | Texas News | San Antonio | San Antonio Current (sacurrent.com)



"https://slate.com/technology/2018/04/anger-isnt-a-mental-illness-but-we-should-still-treat-it.html
Is mental health the cause of mass killings? The writer of this post gives us some important food for thought. From this psychologist'.s viewpoint, the motivation is uncontrolled anger ...rarely an underlying mental illness. This supports an argument of why we need red flag laws and background checks as part of sensible gun legislation. However, the solution she suggests goes far beyond any legislation discussed today...it is teaching young people anger management and the tools are there...even in Colorado, which she holds up as one model.

https://www.denverpost.com/2019/08/05/red-flag-gun-laws-trump-colorado/

Friday, May 27, 2022

Why making mental health better, gun advocates' solution. is not enough

In trospect, better mental health services mean little without red flag laws and even then,  it is iffy. Over the past years, I have written columns after Columbine, Aurora, and other mass killings.  That professionals can spot a future mass killer assumes the killer even had visited a mental health professional, but when they do, there is a 50-50 chance even a trained pro can predict the patient will act out.  Even then,  what motivates a mass killer may not be an identified diagnosis.  Uncontrolled anger is technically not a mental health disease, so red flag laws need to be broader than just a diagnosis of paranoia or some other formal diagnosis of a recognized illness.  Those of us who have had to raise teenagers also know that even after 18 years old, few can control themselves and avoid risky behavior.. Their brains, especially young males, have not matured yet to be wired to be rational. The assumption needs to be all under 21 are a potential risk.  At the minimum, if there is no ban of assault-type weapons of war, the age should be raised to 21.  Some states have done that, but a neighboring state may not which is why the approach needs to be federal.  If such laws had been in effect in Texas, chances are Uvalde would not have happened since the shooter was just 18, no red flags, and no record of a personality out of control that we know of so far.   I am reproducing an excerpt below from one of those columns and references to sources coloring my opinions. 
in the wake of the Aurora Colorado theatre shooting, the shooter had been under the care of a psychiatrist who did flag him, but restrictions kept anyone from acting. My psychologist friends (I am a supporter of mental health system improvements and access to counseling through a faith-based organization) tell me even then they have only a 50-50 chance of predicting which of their patients will carry out mass shootings or kill someone. Mental health is a factor, but in courts of law, the insanity plea is rarely successful. Should we improve our mental health services? Yes. Every little bit will help, but it is not a panacea or even a major deterrent. Without red flag laws permitting reporting of people may be a threat and without universal background checks, improved mental health access still hamstrings the ability for mental health professionals to prevent mass killings.
http://bigthink.com/risk-reason-and-reality/the-supreme-court-ruling-on-the-2nd-amendment-did-not-grant-an-unlimited-right-to-own-guns

"https://slate.com/technology/2018/04/anger-isnt-a-mental-illness-but-we-should-still-treat-it.html
Is mental health the cause of mass killings? The writer of this post gives us some important food for thought. From this psychologist'.s viewpoint, the motivation is uncontrolled anger ...rarely an underlying mental illness. This supports an argument of why we need red flag laws and background checks as part of sensible gun legislation. However, the solution she suggests goes far beyond any legislation discussed today...it is teaching young people anger management and the tools are there...even in Colorado, which she holds up as one model.

https://www.denverpost.com/2019/08/05/red-flag-gun-laws-trump-colorado/