Why military intervention does not work out; a strong warning to hawks
Fareed Zakaria on CNN Sunday, October 18, 2015, delivered a strong warning to those who think the definition of American strength , its exceptionalism, and leadership is military intervention. He reviews both the Russian experience and the US since the Eisenhower administration and the resulting disasters, humanitarian, quagmire and occupation and failure then and now as a lesson for the future. He praises Dwight Eisenhower's wisdom for bucking public sentiment for military action.
I strongly agree and those who are rational could agree as well because evidence is based on experience . Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
I yield my posting this week to him.
For his excellent concise comment on the subject, go to http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1510/18/fzgps.01.html
WELCOME TO THE BLOG This blog reflects my views of current political issues.. It is also an archive for columns in the Sky Hi News 2011 to November 2019. Winter Park Times 2019 to 2021.(paper publishing suspended in 2021) My Facebook page, the muftic forum, posts blog links, comments, and sharing. Non-political Facebook page: felicia muftic. Subscribe for free on Substack: https://feliciamuftic.substack.com Blog postings are continuously being edited and updated.
Monday, October 19, 2015
Sunday, October 11, 2015
The rule of secular law is the law of the land
The rule of secular law
As a former county clerk myself, the county
clerk who refused to issue marriage
licenses to same sex couples because it violated her religious beliefs, got me
thinking about the differences between a country ruled by laws that were
secular, not connected
with religious or spiritual matters, and a country ruled by an official state religion. The U.S. is governed
by secular laws.
That issue, secular vs religious rule, dominated debates in American history among and within the colonies, but it became
one of the compromises expressed in the First Amendment when the Constitution was
formulated and ratified. It forbad
Congress from establishing a state religion and protected freedom to practice
one’s own religion.
Our founding fathers
were influenced by their bitter
experience with persecution under the English kings who also served as the
religious rulers by divine right and the
divisive practices of some colonies , such as the Puritans of Massachusetts who
substituted persecution justified by one religious belief with another just as
cruel.
In modern times the issue of separation of church and state
has been the subject of many a US Supreme Court rulings. Sometimes other Constitutional provisions such
as the 14th Amendment that established the right of equal protection
under the law seem to conflict with the First Amendment. The Supreme Court is the arbiter that resolves
those conflicts and they ruled in 2014 that equal protections trumped laws in those states that had passed laws motivated by
religious beliefs of their majority forbidding same sex marriage.
A key to a stable, successful
democracy is a rule of secular law that protects minority interests. Failure to do so has hobbled many wannabe
democracies .The tension within secular states vs Islamist advocates of Sharia
law , the religious laws derived from interpretations of the Koran, have played
out in the Arab Spring . In Egypt ,deposed
President Mubarek’s secular law was replaced by the Muslim Brotherhood’s Sharia
type laws that resulted in persecution of Christians and others, followed by a military coup that re-established secular
law. In Turkey, a government tried to
replace the secular laws of Ataturk
(founder of modern Turkey) with more Islamist ones. The result has been many demonstrations,
bombings and unrest, attempted power grabs, and changes in leadership. The Nobel peace prize was just awarded to a
group in Tunisia who hammered out a compromise between Islamists and secularists,
though the country is still a home to
many Islamic extremists.
Most American elected
and appointed officials swear on a Bible to uphold the laws of the land which
are secular. Kentucky clerk, Kim Davis, refused to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples because
she was
acting because of her religious beliefs that forbad her to do so. Her action resulted in jail time for contempt of
court.
Another Kentucky clerk opined :
" Why take away the majority's right [just] to give the minority their
rights?” Send her back to school for civics lessons. The
First and 14th amendment protects minority rights from being
trampled by the majority , but they are not
enforced under the authority of state sponsored religion but under the
authority of the secular Constitution.
Felicia Muftic served as Denver County Clerk from
1983-1991.
A version of this appeared in the www.skyhidailynews.com October 23, 2015
For sources tapped for the column visit www.mufticforumblog.blogspot.com and also visit the posting: Freedom of religion, a right so often misunderstood
A version of this appeared in the www.skyhidailynews.com October 23, 2015
For sources tapped for the column visit www.mufticforumblog.blogspot.com and also visit the posting: Freedom of religion, a right so often misunderstood
Bowman, Brad (September 2, 2015). "Defiant county clerks standing ground on
gay marriage issue". The State Journal (Frankfort, KY).
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/national/supreme-court-opinion-on-same-sex-marriage/1605/
Monday, October 5, 2015
The GOP's logic on the Iran deal and same sex marriage escape me
There are some public policy positions being promoted by a
variety of politicians that just do not seem logical. Often good politics trump reason, especially
when they invigorate the juices of their
political bases. Take the examples of
the failed attempt in Congress to block the Iran nuclear deal and some freedom
of religion arguments advanced by the GOP.
The logical element
of the Iran deal is that it will keep war from happening immediately, and maybe
even in a distant future, though much can change in a decade for better or for
worse. On the other hand, failure to
pass the deal would have freed all other participants to drop any sanctions and
they had made that clear they would do so. Clearly sanctions by one country,
the US, would not be effective in changing Iran’s behavior any more than they
were against Cuba. Sanctions by the larger international community were the
only leverage against Iran. Iran could
develop nuclear weapons in a few months. Past cyber attacks, assassinations of scientists, and
bombing runs caused only temporary setbacks. With the deal, violations of sanctions will
trigger automatic reinstatement of international sanctions and military action
is still an option. There will be constant monitoring of nuclear sites capable
of nuclear weapons production and supply lines, with some level of inspections
lasting past the ten year period.
Opponents to the deal
ginned up fear, not reason. Their argument: Iran’s government had bad policies toward its
people and was untrustworthy. The deal does not rely on trust or love. Inspections
are regarded by the international community as the most stringent ever imposed
on any country. Unable to refute that,
the opponents just ignored or distorted the inspection protocols in their multi-
million dollar ad campaign full of misleading statements and instead, scared
the public into opposing the deal.
In preparation for the 2016 elections, a fear mongering ad
is running against Colorado Democratic Senate incumbent, Michael Bennet claiming
he will be responsible for a nuclear holocaust caused by his vote in favor of
the Iran deal. This ad, with multi lingual countdown by children, is similar to
the one Democrats used effectively against GOP presidential candidate Barry
Goldwater in 1964 who had indicated a willingness to use nukes. It depicted a
child counting daisy petals followed by a nuclear blast. Bennet has a reasoned case to make the Iran
deal would immediately make a nuclear war less likely.
Also illogical is the GOP’s freedom of religion argument
that same sex marriage destroys religious freedom. Same sex marriage is contrary to religious beliefs
held by many who would like government to force others to uphold their views
and step on others ’rights. In 2014 the Supreme Court ruled same sex couples
must be allowed to marry nationwide regardless if state laws permit marriage
only by heterosexual couples. The ruling was particularly pertinent to
officials issuing marriage licenses. A county clerk was jailed when she refused
to issue licenses to same sex couples because it violated her religious
beliefs. She has always been free to resign or run for another office, and she
is still protected by the Constitution to continue her crusade elsewhere.
Noticed: the ruling did not prevent heterosexual marriage.
A version of this was published in the Sky Hi Daily News (www.skyhidailynews.com) October 8,9, 2015
A version of this was published in the Sky Hi Daily News (www.skyhidailynews.com) October 8,9, 2015
For more, visit the July 19, 2015 posting “The GOP comes out swinging against the
Iran deal…. Also see the 8/2/15 blog posting: Heads up, spinners at work on the Iran deal....for a critique of the anti Iran deal ads
Felicia Muftic is a former Denver County Clerk who was sworn
in to uphold the Constitution and the rule of law.
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/national/supreme-court-opinion-on-same-sex-marriage/1605/
Tuesday, September 29, 2015
John Boehner's and the Pope's Balancing Acts: Boehner's act fails; the Pope succeeds
Circus balancing acts nearly always succeed. It they do not,
performers do not stay long in the business.
Politics is another story. Last week saw balance take a back seat to
extreme views when House Majority Leader John Boehner threw in the towel, foreseeing
a collision with a forty member Tea
Party caucus wanting to hold hostage the functioning of government to a single issue.
Pope Francis with great delicacy delivered
messages in person to the American people and Catholics in a way that would make
a tight rope walker proud.
In past eras, the middle, the balance between poles, was once
the substance of the business of governing.
It is rare now when balance works and often imbalance is cheered by
partisans holding less than a majority vote when they roll over their
opposition without having themselves to budge an inch or take a political
penalty at the ballot box.
Boehner quit, he said, to save the institution of Congress.
He probably meant that Congress was structured to force compromise. I suspect
another reason was that he wanted to come to the aid of the Republican Party. Most right wing Tea Party members of his GOP
Congressional caucus were protected from political repercussions by representing
safe districts with constituents who agreed with them. The Tea Party had failed
to get their way on defunding Planned Parenthood when the House votes were
counted. Never mind federal laws already
prevented federal funds from being used for abortions. They cared little if
their actions would deprive the service of any federal dollars to provide other
low cost women’s health services. They
threatened to block approval of the entire federal budget, resulting in
shutdown of government services.
Boehner had been there, done that. In 2013, the GOP
dominated House engineered an actual shutdown for two weeks over a single
issue, defunding Obamacare. The
result: The economy took a $12 to $24 billion hit. The GOP got the blame in
spite of their attempt to cast blame on a stubborn President. Polls showed Americans believed the GOP was responsible over
Democrats 39 percent to 19 percent.
In order for Boehner to stop this government shutdown, he
would have had to draw on Democratic votes, an anathema to Republican extremists. They had attacked Boehner in the past for
relying on the enemy and Boehner was facing some very contentious moments if he
did it again. Clearly he was just tired of it and he, humming “ Zip-a-dee-doo
dah”, quit.
On the other hand, Pope Francis was last week’s balancer in
chief, giving pronouncements on his visit to the US about what he considered to
be the moral course on critical governmental issues, some of which warmed the
hearts of conservatives with his family focus, and cheered liberals with issues
such as caring about income inequality, humane treatment of immigrants and
refugees, caring for the poor, and global warming. While he did not propose legislative
directives of “thou shall or shalt not” to Congress, he urged compromise and
dissed extremism. Nonetheless, he made his points without adding to the
political polarization he so deplored. Perhaps the Pope inspired devout
Catholic Boehner to turn his disgust
with extremists into the action he took.
The edited version appeard in the Oct 1, 2 2015 Sky Hi Daily News www.skyhidailynews.com
The edited version appeard in the Oct 1, 2 2015 Sky Hi Daily News www.skyhidailynews.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)