Showing posts with label presidential immunity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label presidential immunity. Show all posts

Sunday, May 10, 2026

What history will remember about the Roberts' 6 to 3 Supreme Court

The Roberts Court will be remembered for three decisions that have had a profound impact on American politics and governance: Citizens United, granting presidential immunity, and removing protections against racial gerrymandering. These decisions will be their legacy. benefiting the powerful at the expense of the well-being of ordinary citizens in their pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness.  

1. Citizens United is a decision that opened the floodgates of secret corporate money to influence who gets elected to public office and controls regulatory and tax policies.  Their considerations now take precedence over the well-being of common citizens, becoming poorer while they become richer. (Citizens United v. FEC (2010)  This decision further protected corruption and the old truism: he who pays the piper calls the tune.

2. Granting of immunity from criminal prosecution while acting in an official capacity. This has resulted in a president who is unconcerned about breaking the law or defying the Constitution.(Trump vs the United States, 2024) It has enabled the President to use fear, revenge, and threats. The result: the executive branch has been able to ignore the separation of powers by cowing Congressional opposition. It has avoided prosecution for any criminal acts, such as becoming rich and powerful from foreign investors, benefiting the President's own pocket and his family. He has also abused the power of pardon, extending that immunity to his staff by promising to pardon them in advance of his leaving office.We now have a lawless and out-of-control president who is taking advantage of the situation to benefit his power and wealth. Decisions he makes are, at a minimum, suspect of benefiting him personally rather than the ordinary people he governs. It gives him the ability to ignore public anger over the affordability of their day-to-day living because he believes he has the autonomous power to govern as he sees fit, and there is no power to stop him.

3. Permitting racist gerrymandering while piously or deceptively claiming they had eliminated race from consideration in the practice of gerrymandering because it is no longer a problem. In one swoop, they negated the civil rights movement of many years ago.( Louisiana v. Callais) , 2026 The result is the elimination of the ability and power of African Americans to have their voices heard in Congress and have the power to protect their civil and voting rights.  The white-dominant state legislatures in former slave states are now hurrying in advance of November midterms to redraw Congressional boundaries to eliminate an estimated 22 seats held by African Americans, moving African American voters into predominantly white-dominated districts.  Their stated reason is to maintain GOP seats and control of Congress this November, despite unfavorable polls.

Thursday, April 30, 2026

Trump's belief he can ignore bad poll numbers just got a boost from the Supreme Court

How can Trump ignore his plunging polls? In his ego-driven arrogance, he thinks he can control the outcome of the 2026 midterms and ignore popular sentiment. or even their vote count. Yesterday's Supreme Court decision is one of its many contributions to Trump's arrogance. (The others: Citizens United and presidential immunity from criminal prosecution) Plunging polls mean little to the officeholder who will not be a candidate in the next election...and Trump is a lame duck, free to feather his own nest while he can.

While piously claiming the decision that racial gerrymandering was a no-no, the Roberts court majority granted a victory to white southerners who objected to too much power being given to African Americans in drawing election districts. The current makeup results in 1/3 of the seats likely to vote for African American representatives, the same percentage of African Americans of the entire state, 30%. SCOTUS just okayed giving all seats except one to white-dominated voters, depriving the 30% of full representation in Congress. In short it was ok to give the white folks a disproportionate advantage, but not ok for the Black folks to get a fair share. ..if I understand the math ok. The effect of the decision couched in deceptive terms of fairness was to gut a main provision of a civil rights constitutional amendment, which would prevent racial gerrymandering resulting in racial discrimination in the first place. https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/scotus-smothers-voting-rights-act-greenlighting-racial-discrimination-and-a-rash-of-gop-gerrymanders/ It now opens the door to other white-dominated southern states to do the same now and in the future in order to limit a proportional representation of their population.


Trump has plans to overturn the anticipated losses in the midterms and the will of the majority of the people. He is using the tools of gerrymandering, like this on race, seizing control of states' voting lists to target and suppress anticipated voters, grabbing vote machinethat tabulate the ballots, and using ICE paramilitary dressed for war in Afghanistan to frighten off brown people from voting at polling places in person, while eliminating mail-in voting by executive order..(A fool's errand given the Constitution that gives states such control). The Supreme Court yesterday gave the green light for racial gerrymandering, undermining a major thrust of the civil rights movement and, in the long term, attempting to suppress African Americans' ability to elect representatives. who support their interests.

The Roberts Court's contribution to Trump's arrogance is now furthered, yesterday, adding to the past rulings, with a gift of immunity from criminal prosecution to Trump, and its Citizens United decision permitting dark money to be contributed to candidates, opening the floodgates to epic corruption to influence government policies favoring them, and candidate corruption by secret corporate donations. Yesterday's blow was one more nail in the coffin of voters' power to shape their destiny, the essence of a democracy. 

Update May 16, 2026

From my May 16, 2026 posting on Facebook:

If the Democrats continue with their theme for November 2026 of attacking Trump for costs, chaos, and corruption, they have a good chance to hold onto the 60% who disapprove of Trump. How much of the other 40% who do not may even help break through the gerrymander strategy the COP has concocted to try to hold on to Congress.. The question becomes how much of that 40% could stay at home or come out swinging in loyalty to Trump. that does not care about costs, chaos, and corruption, but prioritizes something else. What is that something? Cultural, racial, partisan loyalty, fear of libs, business interests? One clue is the geographic distribution of the attempt to cancel out every African American congressperson as fast as the white state legislatures' majority can take advantage of the recent Supreme Court green-lighting the end of voting rights clauses that had forbidden racial gerrymandering. One black Louisiana legislator I heard comment said it most diplomatically: MAGA is the last gasp of the Confederacy.