Friday, August 29, 2025

Congratulations, MAGA, you have now turned America into the nightmare our founders warned us about

 Congratulations, MAGA, you have now turned America into the very nightmare our founders warned us about. In modern terms, per this opinion piece, we have turned into a fascist state (no ovens yet, just concentration camps and military occupation). Horrors, you say, how dare you call this fascism. If it isn't, what is it? Give me a better word. Then tell me how this benefits your daily life with a president obsessed with amassing power to the extent he can ignore your needs, whether it is affordable and effective modern health care, groceries, shelter, and the ability to object and be heard or to get him to change course. The more power he gets, the less he has to listen to us and how we live our daily lives. We once had a form of government of, by, and for the people. Now we have a government that has become the government of, by, and for, an all-powerful individual. He is taking away ordinary people's ability to cope and the right to object, complain, without fear or favor, or fairness, and affect what he does. He's got his agenda and if it is not yours, or in the future it turns out not to be yours, you are SOL. Did you vote for this?

 What kind of dictator, this wannabe (per Gov. Pritzker) aspires to be: a fascist one?  From, a prior post: MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: What is fascism and does Trump meet the definition rev.8/13/2025 updated 8/14- 15/2025 Trump is acting like a dictator and, in many respects, like a fascist one, depending on the definition or criteria. An Australian political scientist in 2013 published a study of 1930s fascist dictators and identified some common characteristics.  In any case, you do not have to have Nazi extermination ovens to still be called a fascist. Are those who support Trump fascists, too? Take the Britt test below. Dr. Lawrence Britt, an Australian political scientist, wrote "14 Defining Characteristics of Fascism" after studying the fascists of the 1930s.

For those who wonder where they fit in, take the Britt test

In bold print are Britt's defining characteristics of fascism. In Italics, my reason for contending Trump is meeting or not meeting those characteristics.

Nationalism: saying one's own country is better than other countries. Not exactly: Trump contends the US is failing and other countries are taking advantage of us.
Disdain for human rights: The core issues are around due process, and cruelty in imprisonment and snatching off the street because a person looks like a "Mexican". Trump would welcome those from Norway, however, to migrate to the US. Obviously, white people are not targeted.
Scapegoating: blaming someone else for the country's problems: Trump is constantly whining about migrants from south of the border who are rapists and murderers and criminals; now he and his supporters are hinting they want to stop birthright citizenship and revoke refugee status, as well as revoke already granted citizenships.
Putting the military first: Only if it pledges loyalty to Trump, passes his test for that, or is not led by women, non white people, gays, etc. The assumption is that black and brown people and women are inherently not as competent as men. More faith is put in paramilitary ICE, masked, not in uniform, pardoning militias, unregulated, from violent acts that were found guilty by juries for insurrection. Insurrection is fine if it is done in support of Trump, is the message. His use of the national guard on streets does not address underlying problems of homelessness and crime, but is only for show, a temporary drama, and an attempt to see if he can get away with declaring a bogus emergency, nationally or locally as a way to assert his willingness to use the military against their own fellow citizens as his campaign of fear and suppression of demonstrations of opposition. (His use of the military to get us used to armed occupation to put down any demonstrations and the pretension and show that he cares about crime, as he grants pardons to criminals who supported him.)

Sexism: saying men are better than women: End DEI, equal rights for genders, and a mantra incompetent in military (as above) and tolerates Hegseth's religion that women shouldn't even be able to vote; found in civil suit Trump was liable for rape, has: boasted of p grabbing and now his relationship with Epstein, his attempt to sidestep and hide evidence. is causing suspicion as he is hiding something and apparently fears exposure.
Control of mass media: telling newspapers and other sources of news what they can and cannot tell the people: Threatens to yank broadcast licenses, forces broadcast media mergers until they fire objectionable comedians; cuts funding the public broadcasting; stops access to White House briefings if he does not like the reporter.
Focus on national security: Crickets on this one. Trump undermines cybersecurity funding, trusts Russia's CRU more than the US CIA,... Uses bogus claims of national emergency to bring in active military and national guard; once, Trump tried to get the military to shoot black lives matter protestors in the legs. Ok if Russia interferes in elections or land-grabbing aggression, undermines NATO. Hints would not honor article 5, does not care if Europe feels threatened if Russia takes all of Ukraine, advocates peace at any price, even if it endangers world or regional peace. Thinks appeasement works.
Close ties between religion and government: Follows and achieves white nationalist Christian plan (Project 2025) to replace the personnel in the various branches and agencies with their ideologues..
Protection of businesses and corporations: Destroys or subverts consumer and environmental protection agencies; gives special tax breaks to corporations; tells lies that tariff costs are not passed on to customers in higher prices
Suppression of labor power: preventing labor unions from becoming powerful: against right-to-work laws; promotes non-union auto assembly shops, puts flunkies in charge of the NLRB
Disdain for intellectuals and the arts: telling people not to listen to scientists, scholars, and artists, took over the Kennedy Center; trashes White House historical decor with gold gilt; anti-science in control of scientific agencies like Robert Kennedy Jr.; calls any evidence of global warming a fraud; disbands key climate and weather forecasting agencies. Dictates to Harvard and Columbia what curriculum should be, or lose government contracts, and then uses them to cow every other research institute associated with a private university with similar threats
Focus on crime and crimefighting: Ignores crimes that are committed by supporters or pardons those convicted of crimes who he likes, January 6 rioters, and even criminals and murderers imprisoned in foreign prisons. Using "national security" bogus excuses to crack down on local enforcement agencies in DC and LA, while threatening other major cities that have black mayors.
Corruption: conducted in plain sight with his cryptocurrency, with sales and investments based on his name and position, selling access to foreign interests to him for dinners, etc, hiding campaign contributions in crypto; accepts gifts (747) from princes;
.Fraudulent elections: Claims any vote where the tally goes against him is always because the election was stolen or there was fraud, always without evidence. Tried to get loyalists to get control of voting machines; claimed over 60 state elections were fraudulent in 2020, and no court found evidence of it; Still claims the 2020 election was stolen but never coughed up evidence after 5 years of trying.. Instructed Texas to start gerrymandering districts to get 5 more House seats and in order to misrepresent voters' will, deprive racial minorities of Congressional representation, and fix the 2026 elections. They want to federalize elections and take the administrative power away from states, giving Trump the power to more easily control the outcome to benefit him. Trump wants to control the vote count by federal control of voting machines and banning mail in ballots. He got his advice from Putin, per the New York Times. MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: Trump's newest attack democracy's rule by people via a vote. ban mail in ballots and voting machines


Messaging again: Is it time to position the Democratic party as the pro-democracy party?

 With all of Trump's words recently regarding the value of being a dictator and his hihts he will run for a third term in 2028 (in violation of the Constitution which he ignores and gets away with), is it time for the Democrats to position themselves as a pro-democracy party?

Democrats have been floundering around in search of a positive message.  This is one and Trump's recent dog whistle to MAGA dictatorship lovers is an opening.  The implied contrast with the GOP is rich. MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: So is Trump now appealing for the pro dictator vote while he says he is not one?

If you want to reach ordinary people with ordinary words, please, I have some pet peeves that need to be retired
Overreach: as President Trump overreaches his power. It is worse than that. How about "power grab" and if appropriate," unconstitutional power grab:"
Unprecedented: So what. Some want to try something new since the old way didn't work:...If the historical reference is the point, how about "never in the history of our democracy" and if appropriate, "never in the history of our country did we have a president who wanted to be a dictator"
Existential: It meant one thing to Camus and other European novelists of the last century..and it sounds like the speaker has got to be some sort of a fancy intellectual, but how about" happening now" or if appropriate," 3 alarm fire"; or" the threat is right now"

There is a flood of great speaking out by others:  here are two that particularly hit me. 

Ali Velshi 8/30/25 on MSNBC delivered a blistering, first class opinion asking "Where's the party'. The party: Democrats This is well worth while for you to hear. It expresses the same frustration I have felt regarding a party that can't stop examining its navel and wringing hands, but they are not providing any real leadership to save our democracy. Where is the Party?: Time for Democratic leaders to ‘fight with both hands’ or ‘step aside’

In Trump's words about his views of beging called a dictator, he instead glorifies the concept of becoming one:   From Don’t be fooled by Trump’s dictatorship jokes "In comments he recently made at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, he said that instead of calling him a dictator, “they should say we’re going to join him and make Washington safe.” This week, he brought it up again — several times. On Monday, during a meeting at the White House, he complained, “They say, ‘We don’t need him, freedom, freedom… He’s a dictator. He’s a dictator.’ A lot of people are saying, ‘Maybe we like a dictator.’” He made a similar comment the next day: “The line is that I’m a dictator, but I stop crime. So a lot of people say, ‘You know, if that’s the case, I’d rather have a dictator.’” He added later, “Most people say, “If you call him a dictator, if he stops crime, he can be whatever he wants.’ I’m not a dictator, by the way.”

But since he believes he has unlimited power to do anything he chooses, it’s pretty clear that he is open to entertaining the notion. As he said on Tuesday during a Cabinet Meeting, “I have the right to do anything I want to do. I’m the president of the United States. If I think our country is in danger, and it is in danger in these cities, I can do it.” 

If those aren’t the words of a would-be dictator, I don’t know what would be.

Trump is raising the prospect of a dictatorship over and over again to normalize it, to make it something from which the American people will no longer recoil — and that it’s accepted and even supported by many Americans. Will it work? CNN has reported that Trump’s followers are increasingly in favor of dictatorship — as long as he is the dictator. The question is whether the rest of the country will be so sanguine. 

In the meantime, even if he’s not quite embracing the term itself, the president is behaving like a dictator. And so far, he’s getting away with it. ..

Now, Trump senses an opening — and he is going for it."

Another great op ed from the Raw Story:  These two factors — and no others — will lead to Trump's defeat | Opinion

Here is my take on whether to keep on the pro-Democracy track or not. Read it.
This Raw Story op-ed is on target, in my opinion. To comment and agree with Raw Story: 1.) Whatever public polls there are, most have Trump's approval rating at mid-40s and disapproval at low 50's. not good enough to cause a blue wave.. That is despite everything thrown at him from calling a dictator, fascist, to Epstein, to being inhumane, and polls showing disapproval of every one of his issue policies. 2) The only two that will make the difference in 2026-2028, his obvious signs of aging (it worked against Biden, too) and the economy, with or without the tariffs. Consumers will still feel the pain and his failure to deliver. Prices will remain high if they do not get higher.
I will continue to beat the drum for democracy. Maybe someone besides a (D) will listen and care, but so far, that one seems to be preaching to the choir. The choir needs a director, and it has not found its voice, but it is at least attentive and still searching for the right notes.
However, that one... keeping democracy as my drumbeat.. is dear to my heart because I am old enough and have personal experiences with dictatorships to wish it on no one, especially Americans who do not realize or have taken for granted the gem of the system of governance we have had for 250 years. Any American who thinks strongmen, autocrats, and dictators are better than the system we have is...to put it rawly...an ignorant fool. Fundamentally in any of those degrees of dictatorships, people lose their ability to complain without repercussions and to influence or make changes to the policies of the big guy in charge. The big guy controls the power buttons, including the ballot box results and the media message. Instead of government of, by, and for the people, it is government of, by, and for the great leader whose main goal is to stay in power by any means. That is still why I think it is important to brand the Democratic Party as the pro-democracy party, too. In the long term, it will be what counts in our lives. It is the right thing to do.

Thursday, August 28, 2025

A proposal to save lives from deranged mass shooters: involve social media users

A proposal to save lives from deranged mass shooters:  involve social media users in a "if you see something, say something" campaign. The campaign would urge users to report disturbing postings and videos, a mechanism to report and make referrals, and private and public funding suggestions..

There were comments this morning on cable that the Minneapolis shooter left warning signs on social media, in this case, YouTube. If that was so, why didn't someone report it or even know where to report it? Unlike China or dictators, we do not have a cadre of many monitors of social media, but the real army in the US is the users of social media, from elementary school to citizens of all ages. The effective use of citizens to be alert and report those who are posting plans and comments that are the warning signs, is as applicable to warning about a person carrying a gun as they are entering a public space, as it is to those using social media.  So many of the shooters have no criminal record because they are young or clever, so those legally buying weapons escape detection through databases when they fill out the required paperwork.  What about a national campaign by private and public entities to promote "see something, say something" on social media and report it to some hotline run by, say the the FBI or ATF,911, or a mental health agency tied to a national website/telephone number/ ?. The campaign should include what are warning signs are as well as where to report it. For those who do not want to be accused of being a snitch, or even a fearful parent not knowing what to do, the ads should contain the concept that your report could save the life of both the prospective shooter and the victims. Like all hotlines answered in person or from an email, good screening needs good judgment, and knowledge about which police or mental health agency the referral is made to depends upon good training.  Social media companies and the Ad Council could be sources of funding for the campaign and hotline training and manning, as well as federal funding, to make this a long term campaign.

Tuesday, August 26, 2025

The old GOP trick: Whenever in doo doo, the GOP invokes law and order

 Fear is sweeping DC that Democrats will take over the House in 2026. Pulling the panic button the GOP not only tries to cut expected losses by gerrymandering to gain seats, they are pulling their old rabbit out of the magic hat: Democrats are soft on crime; the GOP is tough on crime. President makes provocative claim during Cabinet meeting as National Guard patrols DC streets | Fox News Trump will make crime the top issue in 2026.

Willie Horton in 1988? GOP ads in 2022? The GOP mouths familiar words, but their Big Beautiful Bill cuts funding to after-school programs and adds nothing to local policing. Instead, Trump cut billions from local police reforms and improvements and Gov. Pritzker charged he "defunded police". Trump Reverses Biden Directive on Policing Reforms | Brennan Center for Justice. Trump's big beautiful bill diverted funding from policies that shift funds away from some policing and crime-prevention programs. So, Trump threatens to send in the military just to make the point that he is the big muscle caring about your safety and protection against crime.  As usual, the perception by the loyal GOP followers is that crime is always out of control whenever there are black mayors in blue states.  The statistics show crime rates are as bad to worse in red states' cities, but who in the GOP cares about statistics? Perception is all that counts. 

  In the meantime, if there was a crime wave to justify such military intervention, the Big Beautiful Bill added nothing to support of urban policing and instead yanks funds from community-based policing and taking guns off the street beginning in 2026..  Instead, all law enforcement increases were for combating immigration.  Trump loves crime committed on his behalf  or by those who support him enough as he issues pardons and gets immunity to commit crimes himself, a gift from the Supreme Court. 

The next question is how Democrats should counter this Trump strategy to make crime the issue: One way is to show that Democrats don't like crime either, and then come up with a plan that makes sense. It may vary from one area to another, but it isn't just strategy and collaboration, or solving urban social problems caused by poverty.  I have served in big city local government, have had close friends in law enforcement, and sat through interminable city council debates.  There is no silver bullet. However, more cops on the beat on foot or bike do two things: one, make a visible statement, giving reassurances to residents,  and two, get on the ground response more quickly in high crime urban areas. The difference is that Democrats would extend such programs not only to cities with high crime rates in blue states but also to cities in need in red states.

In politics, visibility counts in shaping perception.  I could see some smart candidate proposing an idea like "a cop a block" in targeted high crime areas or something catchy and visible like that, and then proposing funding more cops visible on the streets.  That may be where Congress fits into the picture. That may not be the best and highest use, but at least it would provide something better than a soldier on every block for only 30 days. What happens when they leave, anyway?  Soldiers are not trained to be cops of civilians, make arrests, and intervene to defuse hot conflicts.  It is like the concept of community cop policing in schools. or a cop on every subway train or bus stop. 

 https://www.nlc.org/article/2025/07/11/local-impacts-from-congress-one-big-beautiful-bill #:~:text=The%20bill%20maintains%20the%20direct,2034%20period%20by%20$3.4%20trillion.%E2%80%9D 

  MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: So is Trump going to send troops into crime ridden cities located in red states?

To keep kids out of trouble, the Big Beautiful bill also It is also withholds nearly $7 billion in gran is to admit t funding to school districts – for before- and after-school programs, teacher training, ... https://www.nlc.org/article/2025/07/11/local-impacts-from-congress-one-big-beautiful-bill/: 

The Campaign Ad that Reshaped Criminal Justice | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios   Willii Horton

Local crime news coverage and concerns about crime | Pew Research Center  2022

https://giffords.org/press-release/2025/05/trump-budget-defunds-the-police/

Trump loves criminals convicted of crimes committed on his behalf  or by those who support him enough as he issues pardons and gets immunity to commit crimes himself, a gift from the Supreme Court. List of people granted executive clemency in the second Trump presidency - Wikipedia

Monday, August 25, 2025

So is Trump now appealing for the pro dictator vote while he says he is not one?

 Donald Trump says, "They say: ‘We don’t need him. Freedom, freedom, he’s a dictator, he’s a dictator,’” Trump told reporters at the Oval Office. “A lot of people are saying, ‘Maybe we like a dictator.’ I don’t like a dictator. I’m not a dictator. I’m a man with great common sense and a smart person.”Trump Suggests Americans Open to a ‘Dictator’ | TIME 

  So, is Trump now trying to be a dictator at the same time he denies he is? It appears he is seeing how much of acting like a dictator now he can get away with before even his usually supportive Supreme Court stops him.

If people want a dictator instead of a democracy, they are a bunch of fools. Some do want one; he is right there, but most Americans see him as a dangerous dictator. They are no fools. Most Americans now see Trump as "a dangerous dictator," poll says. They understand this would no longer be a government of, by, and for the people but a government of, by, and for Trump.   The problem is, how do you keep a wannabe dictator from becoming a full-blown dictator?  It is hard when his political party supports controlling and subverting the barriers standing in his way. This is the "slippery slope to dictatorship" warning, and his loyal followers are greasing the slide. Is it time for Democrats to position themselves as the "pro-democracy" party as a contrast and a positive position of what it stands for?

If a poll asks if you favor an autocracy (another word for a dictator), about 40% of Americans think a strongman is not a bad idea, even a good one. That percentage has popped up consistently over the past year, no matter who polls Americans. Autocracy is rule by one man, not by the rule of law or by the people. . The problem is how to keep a partial autocrat (or a 'light' autocrat or dictator) from becoming a full-blown dictator if the half-baked autocrat removes the barriers, rule of law, independent judiciary, and fair and free elections. That is where we are now: a wannabe dictator acting to take down barriers to his dictatorial ambitions. He is in the process of consolidating power, searching out, firing and using his DOJ, bloggers, loyal agency heads to find and take revenge against anyone in his administration or party or a private and public institution receiving federal funds. How can you stop it when 81% of the political party he controls agrees with the statement \"“President Trump is a strong leader who should be given the power he needs to restore America’s greatness.” (Democracy at a Crossroads: How Americans View Trump’s First 100 Days in Office - PRRI

There are severe downsides to being governed by a dictator.. To change the government or make it responsible to their need, the only way may be by bloody revolution or a coup. Votes and polls do not count. People give up their personal freedoms and rights to disagree and or to complain. They may even have to adopt a religion that is not theirs..They have to always act or write on any media, social or written, like they agree with him in everything they do and say or will fail to get a job, a promotion, or any advancement (if they don;t land in a concentration camp). They only hear news that is propaganda out of the mouths of the dictator. There are no independent facts or opinions permitted, so the only way they know they are screwed is when they see and feel it in their personal lives. Joining together to complain, any protest gatherings, demonstrations, are put down by semi- or full military, and their leaders are jailed, or worse, under the pretext that disloyalty to the dictator is treason to the nation. Business decisions are based on what the dictator wants, not what is good for business profit. If the dictator screws up or becomes corrupt, the people are not in control because the dictator holds all of the power sources, including judges, the military, law enforcement, and money. If it suits him, and not you, tough. Laws and constitutions are not worth the paper they are written on because what laws are observed and how they are observed are those that benefit the dictator staying in power. Ahh, you say, but he will be my dictator and do what I want him to do...but what if he is unhorsed by a coup or violence, and the other side gets in control? You are SOL. How do I know all this (personal experience counts) and that is how it works in Russia and China. Lots of luck, dictator lovers.

The most recent example of Trump's power grab on the road to dictatorship: the use of military against its own citizens.

The Trump initiative to establish a military presence in every big city in a blue state in the name of law and order or fighting crime looks like a dictatorship and is certainly in keeping with his "wannabes". Democrats as a whole have been like a herd of political science professors giving lectures on the blessings of democracy but to put it into blunt terms, Governors Newsom and Pritzker have taken the lead. Pritzker's 8/25/2025 was as about as clear a message delivered to date: Full text of Illinois Gov. JB Pritkzer's speech at news conference on reported Trump military plan for Chicago - CBS Chicago

Here my list of other examples of  his attempts to amass more power that resemble how dictators, past and present, get to power and keep it::

  • He claims his executive orders are the law of the land and acts accordingly until the judiciary he only partly controls stops him. At this time, only the judiciary stands in his way.
  • He accumulates vast wealth from enterprises that include customers who are foreigners..
  • He uses "his" active army to repress protestors and put fear into the hearts of those who would show their anger toward his policies
  • He forces Congress by threat and fear to pass legislation that does not reflect the will of each member's own constituents
  • He sets up prisons to contain those who have no chance to protest and builds concentration camps which deprive persons of their rights or send them to foreign, harsh prisons, without any evidence that they committed crimes other than having documents of status violations.
  • His masked, unmarked, street-clothed federal agents snatch those off the street to arrest targets or those who look like they are from south of our border without warrants, sometimes using excessive force...
  • He threatens to delicense media that do not toe his line and calls all media that criticize him liars
  • He threatens to remove federal funding from education that does not reflect his ideology or the ideology of his core supporters in his political party, while his legislative initiatives are approved around 30% of those polled who know what is in it, the contents about which he lies on his favored media outlets he owns or approves.
  • He abuses his power by using "his" Department of Justice to investigate opponents without any probable cause as a tool to threaten opponents to support his reign or make examples of them to frighten others into silence.
  • He reverses the rights of minorities, religious or love preferences, and non whites, by removing all references to diversity, equity, and inclusion in any federal documents he controls... reinstating the ability of the federal government to discriminate against them again.
  • He adopts all policies of white Christian nationalists written in a document as a blueprint for the takeover of the federal government and institutes them by installing their authors in key positions
  • He refuses to confirm whether he would honor treaties or come to the defense of allies who are attacked and have signed such a treaty...NATO
  • He ignores court orders of any court lower than the Supreme Court if he does not like the ruling..
  • He tries to sell off public lands, institutes tariffs, deprives the poor of health care and nutrition programs to compensate for the loss of income to the treasury due to tax favors and reductions granted to the very rich. 
  • He pardons criminals who were found guilty by jury trial or had already confessed to crimes because they were his supporters, contributors, or friends. In so doing , he encourages those to commit crimes on his behalf in the future, believing they, too, would be pardoned..
Other posts related to this:


In Trump's words about his views of beging called a dictator, he instead glorifies the concept of becoming one:   From Don’t be fooled by Trump’s dictatorship jokes "In comments he recently made at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, he said that instead of calling him a dictator, “they should say we’re going to join him and make Washington safe.” This week, he brought it up again — several times. On Monday, during a meeting at the White House, he complained, “They say, ‘We don’t need him, freedom, freedom… He’s a dictator. He’s a dictator.’ A lot of people are saying, ‘Maybe we like a dictator.’” He made a similar comment the next day: “The line is that I’m a dictator, but I stop crime. So a lot of people say, ‘You know, if that’s the case, I’d rather have a dictator.’” He added later, “Most people say, “If you call him a dictator, if he stops crime, he can be whatever he wants.’ I’m not a dictator, by the way.”

But since he believes he has unlimited power to do anything he chooses, it’s pretty clear that he is open to entertaining the notion. As he said on Tuesday during a Cabinet Meeting, “I have the right to do anything I want to do. I’m the president of the United States. If I think our country is in danger, and it is in danger in these cities, I can do it.” 

If those aren’t the words of a would-be dictator, I don’t know what would be.

Trump is raising the prospect of a dictatorship over and over again to normalize it, to make it something from which the American people will no longer recoil — and that it’s accepted and even supported by many Americans. Will it work? CNN has reported that Trump’s followers are increasingly in favor of dictatorship — as long as he is the dictator. The question is whether the rest of the country will be so sanguine. 

In the meantime, even if he’s not quite embracing the term itself, the president is behaving like a dictator. And so far, he’s getting away with it. ..

Now, Trump senses an opening — and he is going for it."



Is it time for an intervention? Trump's obsessions are getting out of hand

 I am no mental health professional, but if I had a friend to was obsessed about accumulating power for himself by threats and show of force, who was also obsessed with getting revenge for past wrongs, and threatening fearful action against any who would do him wrong in the future, I would be concerned and hope he got some help.   It may be only a hope, because it would take someone with more guts than I have to deal with someone who would take revenge against anyone who would intervene.  

Trump is no friend of mine, but the only intervention that has a chance of working is a stiff rebuke at the ballot box. 

Here is how it looks to me:

So obsessed is he that he fails to deliver on the goods he promises during elections and makes the situation even worse: the cost of living in housing and food.  Instead, he actually raises costs through tariffs and taking away affordable health care and student loan forgiveness .. He controls the content to reflect his racial preferences by taking away funding or permits from universities, the Smithsonian, public broadcasting, and private broadcasting so that only his view of politics is heard, dominate,  or seen. I'm sure I left something out..but this is what comes to immediate mind. 

Trump is obsessed with accumulating power for himself by abusing his power, using fear and threats, and ignoring constraints contained in law and the Constitution. He focuses on revenge and "retribution" against perceived enemies by using the DOJ "investigations" and unverified accusations as an instrument to get revenge,  while trying to cover up past bad behaviors (Epstein) or ignoring his own corruption in amassing a fortune by his crypto side business, which permits foreigners to contribute and makes him a target for bribery.. 

 He uses military in streets of cities in only blue states that have declining crime statistics; he declares some imaginary national emergency to try to circumvent the few constraints left on him, the president, that are in plain enough English in the Constituion to abuse his power as Commander in Chief and find excuses to put armed and uniformed military in cities and states without their permission, either to punish them for being blue and black or to stop any demonstrations against him or ignore due process requirements..;.His DOJ now functions as his private attorney to justify any abuse in legal terms and carry out his revenge by conducting legal actions against his political enemies with no probable cause evidence and cover up any negatives...as in the Epstein files. or threatening and investigating those in the DOJ who once prosecuted him or ruled against him in Court...  He instructs his loyal red states, like Texas to cheat and manipulate Congressional representation district boundaries to benefit him in an upcoming election while ignoring civil rights constraints in the Constitution against racial gerrymandering. He rallies racists to support him with dog whistles and sly comments that are more like bull horns, and his ICE cherry picks certain races to detain, snatching off the streets and imprisoning them in cruel conditions without warrants and minimal due process, and recruits those who want to save "their culture" from "others", an overt appeal to White Nationalists. His use of racism only adds to his accumulation of power for himself, not to mention the damage he does to the rule of law. 

 So obsessed is he that he fails to deliver on goods he promises during elections and makes the situation even worse: cost of living in housing and food.  Instead he actually raises costs through tariffs and taking away affordable health care and student loan forgiveness. He controls the content to reflect his racial preferences by taking away funding or permits from universities, the Smithsonian, public broadcasting and private broadcasting so that only his view of politics are heard or seen. I'm sure I left something out..but this comes to imeedicate mind.


Trump played by Russia again as his art of the deal may let Russia steal Ukraine

Trump gets played by Russia again as Trump toys with letting them have Ukraine.  Russia now rejects even a meeting with Zelensky, which was included in the proposal Trump made to have another meeting after the Alaska meeting of Trump with Putin.. If Trump does nothing now to provide the weapons Ukraine needs to offset Russian aggression, weapons that Europe does not have, he will go down in history as the weakling Putin admirer who purposely lost Ukraine and let Russia march eventually through Eastern Europe.

TACO Trump may strike again. His art of the deal may be to let Russia steal. When Trump gave Russia an ultimatum and then backed it up with a choice of 3 outcomes that included the US may do nothing,(what sort of a bargaining chip is that ?? or arm Ukraine, or levy sanctions (short-term useless), guess which outcome the Russians chose." duh, "US, we think you will do nothing and let us have Ukraine".

JD Vance Sunday says "energetic diplomacy" could still work. Question Vance: What is energetic when the "do nothing alternative" is still on the table (to do "no action" to deliver Ukraine weapons and "let them fight it out" without US help) ?: Vance expresses optimism that 'energetic diplomacy' will end the war in Ukraine



Official Says Without U.S. Funding, Ukraine's Defense Will Likely Collapse > U.S. Department of Defense > Defense Department News

Kremlin casts doubt on Trump's push for Ukraine peace as rifts remain unresolved

Trump: I may let Russia and Ukraine fight it out

Sunday, August 24, 2025

So is Trump going to send troops into crime ridden cities located in red states? Updated 9/3/2025

So is Trump going to send troops into crime-ridden cities located in red states?  I bet those red state governors will not be rolling out their red carpets for the military. I wonder how they would feel if Colorado sent its National Guard without an invitation to help control crime in red state cities like Memphis, Birmingham, or Cleveland? Or if active duty troops got stationed in any of them?:  Or if the courts stop the practice. The first blow to this use: 9/2/2025 Federal judge rules Trump violated military law by activating National Guard in California Posse Comitatus Act was cited in this ruling.

Chicago is not even on the list of the 10 worst if you look at the per capita rates of cities over 100,000 population.  6 of the 10 worst are located in red states.

There are various lists and measurements: A 2025 Case Study: The Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. 

Take a look at this done in June this year. Per adjusted for per capita: here are the 10 worst:  What about Memphis, Birmingham (AL), Kansas City MO, St Louis MO. New Orleans, Cleveland, OH.   all in red states.  

"Based on adjusted crime rates, which provide a more accurate measure of danger relative to population, the following list is the top 10 most dangerous cities in the United States for 2024. This ranking takes into account the prevalence of violent crimes such as murder, robbery, and aggravated assault, as well as property offenses like burglary and motor vehicle theft.

  1. Detroit, MI: With one of the highest violent crime rates in the nation, Detroit consistently ranks as the most dangerous city. The high rate of violent crimes per capita, including assaults and robberies, makes it a particularly risky place for residents and visitors and has ultimately resulted in urban decay and rapid population decline.

  2. Memphis, TN: Memphis has a high rate of violent crime, including a significant number of homicides each year. Its crime rate per capita is among the highest in the country, driven by both violent crimes and offenses like burglary and theft.

  3. Birmingham, AL: Known for its high rates of assault and robbery, Birmingham’s crime rate per capita surpasses the average for American cities, placing it among the most dangerous cities in America.

  4. Kansas City, MO: Kansas City has a high violent crime rate, particularly in certain neighborhoods. When adjusted for population, the city’s crime rate remains concerning, with frequent incidents of assault and robbery.

  5. St. Louis, MO: St. Louis is often cited for having one of the highest homicide rates in the country. Despite its relatively small size compared to other major cities, its per capita violent crime rate makes it one of the most dangerous places in the nation.

  6. Baltimore, MD: Baltimore struggles with high rates of violent crime, including homicides and assaults, primarily driven by gang activity and drug-related offenses.

  7. New Orleans, LA: New Orleans also faces challenges with property crime, not to mention shootings and robberies. When population is considered, the city ranks high on the list of the most dangerous cities in the US.

  8. Albuquerque, NM: Albuquerque has seen rising crime rates in recent years, with increases in both violent and crimes against property.

  9. Cleveland, OH: Cleveland has a high rate of violent crime, including assault and robbery. The city's crime rate per capita is also above the average.

  10. Stockton, CA: Stockton faces challenges with both violent and property-related offenses. It also falls under the most dangerous U.S. cities, particularly in terms of robbery and assault.