Showing posts with label mass deportations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mass deportations. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 1, 2025

What part of the GOP is hard core MAGA

 Trump has a 43 percent approval rating per recent polls. If it is a question of democracy vs dictatorship/authoritarianism, 55% of registered Republicans want a strong man president...which is the question one poll asked. If that is the case, if I had the general feeling...not an exact estimate, but between 30% and 35% of all voters were hard-core MAGA, and the 15 percent are either unengaged, squishy, self-interested business types. Poll by NY Times 9/30/2025: Trump has support of about 90% of registered Republicans...consistent and unchanged in the summer.

The puzzle: Why does Trump continue to consolidate and energize his base instead of reaching out to add to his base? By using fear and favor and cheating, he can afford to ignore the popular vote. My guess is that he thinks that by lies, threatening with military suppression, overt racism, anti migrant mass deportation, and suppression, and limiting the ability of targeted opposition demographic groups to vote, using methods to federalize elections, and above all, political gerrymandering, he can tip the vote to him. If so he does not have to worry about the 55-plus who would turn up on election day to comprise the popular vote.

What's the answer for Democrats? How can they appeal to the 10% to 15 squish and solidify the vote for them? Exactly as Trump won in 2024:  It's the economy, stupid...the cost of living. .. groceries, housing. For that reason, one of the greatest factors in the cost of living of the struggling middle class is the cost of health insurance and the affordability of health care in general.  It tops the concerns list. Clever GOP. Cuts to Medicaid and Medicare will take place after the 2026 midterms, so the task of the Democrats is to make the warning stick that what is coming is bad and the GOP is to be blamed. For the sceptics, warnings that healthcare costs will rise is only part of the message. For many, only actually feeling the pain counts; warnings are political noise. That is the reason the government shutdown is over health care costs this week: it is a way to dramatize and pin the issue on the GOP for what is coming later, as warnings.   However, the actual experience of the pain will begin within a month or two as many get the actual figures of their health insurance in December and January when the cost of Obamacare/ACA will increase by painful and large percentages.  This is not a question of warning of 2027, but immediately the pain will be felt in 2025 and 2026. in time for the midterms.. The GOP big beautiful bill dropped all federal subsidies to the ACA, and the projections that steps must be taken now for providers to be ready by 2027, so that even then, the pain will be felt by providers like rural health have to cut back in 2026..

MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: Are we there yet? Yes. America is no longer a democracy, the land of the free

From an August 1, 2025, Facebook posting, my opinion of how much of the MAGA base is motivated by racism.  Strictly, my opinion. For some time, I have suspected that the Trump regime's mass deportation policies and executive orders were motivated by racism and discrimination against those with roots from south of our border or brown people from elsewhere, I have also suspected that after you peel back all of the reasons MAGA supporters use to justify their support of Trump, economy, business interests, religious beliefs, and despite Trump and friends' immorality and greed, there is a large element of the issue left that is migrant deportation. Everything else but mass deportation seems irrelevant to them. A district court judge just called out Trump's attempt to end all temporary protective visas for migrant refugees fleeing violence, persecution, or natural disasters, racist and discriminatory, and put a temporary hold on the execution of the removal of those holding such visas. The purpose of the special visas was to give refugee status until the conditions in their home from which they fled had improved. The judge found that the condition of their home countries of the plaintiffs had not improved. The evidence of racial discrimination was the words of the Trump regime's administrators themselves. No doubt this will go through the appeal process to end up in the lap of "his" Supreme Court, but the damning language from the judge needs to be cited. For those who protest this ruling, first look in your own mirror. (as of October 2025, the Supreme Court usually sides with the Trump administration on similar issues, but lower courts keep ruling otherwise on temporary protective visas. The issue is still in flux.)

My observations: October 1, 2025: The president calling for active or national guard military and ordering them to Chicago and Portland, where local and state officials object, is a sheer bullhorn appeal to the racists. It is not to fight crime or chaos or cities are burning, when current videos put a lie to that, particularly when crime statistics show 20 to 25% decreases per capita recently, but it will appeal to the bigotry in the MAGA base and to fool them to thinking this is reality, when it is not. Deployment of military to do domestic policing is not only not their training skills in this, they have none, but it seems an obvious violation of the Posse Comitatus provisions in the Constitution and laws of the land that only exempt such measures if there is an insurrection. There may be crime, but it is not an insurrection. A lower court on the use of the military in Los Angeles so ruled. Judge rules Trump illegally deployed National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles

From: Judge halts Trump's termination of TPS for Honduras, Nepal, Nicaragua https://www.msn.com/.../judge-halts-trumps.../ar-AA1JHjR7...
"By stereotyping the TPS program and immigrants as invaders that are criminal, and by highlighting the need for migration management, Secretary Noem's statements perpetuate the discriminatory belief that certain immigrant populations will replace the white population."
Thompson also mentioned comments from Trump and other White House officials about migrants that show racial animus."



Sunday, July 6, 2025

Are the ICE detainees and deported due to racial targeting?

 Are the ICE detainees and those deported due to racial targeting? An obvious answer: yes? All we hear about are asians and those from south of the border, yet the number of migrants without documents from Europe is also estimated to be 500,000 in the US, and blond, blue-eyed,  rarely turn up in news reports or at all. A Facebook friend raised this issue, and I fact-checked it. It is true per a credible source..  Here is the breakdown by country of origin of the undocumented migrants.  

Profile of the Unauthorized Population - US | migrationpolicy.org

Judge Blocks Trump Administration From Carrying Out Indiscriminate Immigration Raids In Los Angeles

4th Amendment applies to the right of the people...against warrantless search and seizures and pertains the reference to probable cause..Fourth Amendment | U.S. Constitution | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

From Google AI with references to source: 

  • "The people" is not limited to citizens:
    While the Fourth Amendment uses the phrase "the people," it has been interpreted to include anyone within the United States' physical borders, not just citizens. 
  • Supreme Court precedent:
    The Supreme Court has addressed this issue in the case United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, ruling that the Fourth Amendment does apply to non-citizens within the U.S. 
  • Due process and equal protection:
    The Fourteenth Amendment also guarantees due process and equal protection under the law to all individuals, including non-citizens, which further reinforces the idea that the Fourth Amendment's protections are not limited to citizens. 




Thursday, May 15, 2025

What SB276 passed into law in Colorado does to protect migrants.in Spanish

 Colorado lawmakers pass major expansion of immigrant protections as Trump administration sues to overturn ‘sanctuary laws’ | SkyHiNews.com

Translated viaGoogle translate into Spanish

Legisladores de Colorado aprueban importante ampliación de las protecciones para inmigrantes mientras la administración Trump demanda para revocar las "leyes santuario" | SkyHiNews.com


La SB 276 amplía muchas de las protecciones existentes en el estado.


Amplía la prohibición de compartir información entre funcionarios estatales y federales para incluir a los gobiernos locales, así como a los poderes judicial y legislativo del estado. También impide que espacios como escuelas, hospitales y guarderías brinden a los agentes federales acceso a espacios privados e información sobre niños o pacientes inscritos, a menos que se presente una orden judicial válida.


El proyecto de ley impone una multa de $50,000 a los infractores, cuyos ingresos se destinarán al Fondo de Defensa Legal de Inmigración del estado.


El proyecto de ley también elimina el requisito de que los estudiantes que buscan matrícula estatal o las personas que buscan una identificación estatal, y que se encuentran en el país sin autorización, presenten una declaración jurada que indique que han solicitado o planean solicitar un estatus legal.


Otras disposiciones del proyecto de ley otorgan a los inmigrantes sin ciudadanía la facultad de impugnar las declaraciones de culpabilidad que hayan presentado inconstitucionalmente por delitos menores de clase 3, delitos de tránsito y faltas.


Además, la SB 276 impide que las cárceles y las fuerzas del orden retrasen la liberación de un acusado a petición de las autoridades federales de inmigración, y estipula que la detención continua de una persona que haya pagado una fianza basada en una orden de detención migratoria civil constituye un nuevo arresto sin orden judicial.


También permite al gobernador denegar el acceso a Colorado a los estados que envían su Guardia Nacional u otras tropas militares.


La representante Elizabeth Velasco, demócrata por Glenwood Springs, la primera legisladora nacida en México en el estado, afirmó que la SB 276 busca proteger los derechos constitucionales. Es una de las principales promotoras del proyecto de ley.


“Este proyecto de ley no otorga a los inmigrantes más derechos que a los ciudadanos, pero garantiza la igualdad de trato ante la ley”, declaró Velasco durante un debate en la Cámara de Representantes el 3 de mayo. “Seguiremos luchando por un Colorado para todos, y juntos somos más fuertes”.


Monday, May 12, 2025

Backing down? TACO Trump modifies; updated 6/21/25

Update 6/20/2025TACO TACO. He reversed himself again and hotel and ag workers are once more the target of ICE.    Actualización 20/06/2025 TACO TACO. Se retractó de su decisión y los trabajadores hoteleros y agrícolas vuelven a ser blanco de ICE.

I may have been wrong: Trump's sinking poll numbers and the Wall Street revolt in response to some crazy policies he advocated caused him to "moderate". Political reality did affect him.  If so, we will have to wait and see if his words are followed by action that implements his announced policies in the short and long term. Pressure from business funders also works: Trump backed down on mass importation of hospitality and farm workers. https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2025/06/taco-trump-backs-off-mass-deportations.html, and then he reversed it again when his immigrant-hating base objected. TACO TACO. https://www.axios.com/2025/06/19/trump-immigration-raids-farms-hotels-border-czar to continue.

 Updated comment 6/7/2025: TACO tag, originating from Wall Street regarding Trump's announced and modified threats of tariffs, is an observation that has resonance. " Trump always chickens out.  " It has much wider application than just on tariff policies. It is the way he operates. It is the art of his dealing: threaten with nasty, over-the-top demands, get the best deal he can for himself politically, even if he has to back down; then claim victory when he gets 10% of his original demands while losing 90%.  That approach has a drawback: in time, used so much and so often, the public wises up and so do his victim/deal targets and call his bluff, stand firm, and just wait for him to "chicken out".

Trump's announcement of pausing and reversing China tariffs for 90 days buys some time and removes the huge backlash he was facing.  The uncertainties are now drawn out for 90 more days, but the political pressure is lessened for now.  The long-term impact of how much he moderates with the rest of the world, Canada, and the EU, is yet to be seen. The recent deal on the UK is PR puffery since we had a positive trade balance already with the UK, and they already had the lowest (10%) across-the-board tariffs that Trump had proposed compared to much of the rest of our trading partners, whom he has threatened. Those are still right up there in higher tariffs. It is still uncertain what the impact of all of this will have on inflation, consumer confidence, and consumer prices in the long term.

The best new policy, if it works as he promises, is reducing the cost of certain prescription drugs to the levels paid abroad for them.  That would take the stress off of Medicare costs to the government to some extent.  Whether it will help those not on Medicare will be the question. Trump included some threats to investigate and pressure them. Negotiating formularies is a continuation of an approach Biden began, and now it will be expanded by Trump. Negotiating formularies on behalf of government-related certain health programs with big pharma to lower drug costs of specific medications had been forbidden until Biden began to do so, and now Trump has continued.  It may break the hold big pharma has had for years. The hurdles to getting it done are complicated and may not be as immediate as he hopes, especially if big pharma fights back. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/12/trump-drug-pricing-order-most-favored-nation.html




Monday, May 5, 2025

Trump's deportations are not like Obama's."How" is as important as "why"

Update: 5/8/2025   Judge in the Abrego Gacia case is still considering whether to force the Trump administration to return those sent to the El Salvador gulag without due process to return them to the US. Judge Boasberg Gives Trump Admin New Directive in Deportations Case

Trump still wants to defy court orders and ship bad dudes to mean off shore gulags: Trump administration plans immigrant flights to Libya as its deportation agenda grows

Continuing with the original post:

 I am listening to some chatter on another page about deportations of undocumented migrants, that since Obama did 2/3 of deportations without due process, then it is OK for Trump to do it. Sometimes, how it is done is as important as why. `Did Obama do cruel family separation? Did Obama do secret flights to avoid a judge requiring due process? Did Obama ship migrants to a foreign gulag who were not criminals or gang members? Did Obama claim we were at a bogus war to get around due process requirements? That no one wants migrant gang members here, including already here migrant Hispanics, is a given. However, how it is done is as important as why it is done. Trump's cruelty and defiance of human and constitutional rights are nothing like how Obama did it.

In reality, Obama's deportation flurry earned him the title of deporter-in-chief and cost Democrats Hispanic support for the next election cycles..
Biden saw that and thought he learned a political lesson... so he was too slow and too little, too late to take action to close the border again after COVID closed it. What Biden was slow to realize was that even Hispanics in America who are already voters didn't want migrant criminals and gang members here either. Neither do most Democrats.

"As President Donald Trump approached his 100th day in office, national polls suggested a clear drop from the 46% share of the Latino vote he received last fall, according to exit polls. Surveys from the Pew Research Center, YouGov/Economist, CNN and Reuters/Ipsos put his approval among Latino voters between 27% and 34%. Two Latino-focused polls confirmed the decline. One national survey from UnidosUS and allied groups showed 37% Latino approval for Trump. Another from the Latino Community Foundation (LCF) and Voto Latino (VL) had the number at 39%."


Like
Comment
Send
Share
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Facebook