Showing posts with label oligarchs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oligarchs. Show all posts

Friday, April 11, 2025

Is chaos the best word for Democrats to use? Messaging again.

 In 2024, Nikki Haley, the only significant primary opponent to Trump, coined the word "chaos" to criticise the kind of government Trump would bring to America if he got elected.  The term "chaos" did not work well enough for her then.  Will it be the best approach for the anti-MAGA today?  Today, I heard Chuck Schumer, Senate minority leader, use the word  "chaos" as the attack charge congressional Democrats are planning as a theme for next week.  "Chaos" may need to be replaced with "cruel" if Trump policies become a long-term, painful reality with higher prices, inflation, and recession, as Democrats have predicted. That could come sooner than later. In fact, it is happening now: https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/stock-market-trump-tariffs-trade-war-04-11-25/card/consumer-sentiment-tanks-in-april-on-recession-fears-zPCqlvnxjQZIIJWhMVEy?mod=e2tw   and https://data.sca.isr.umich.edu/charts.php

What Trump just did in proclaiming a 90-day moratorium on tariff disposition is to keep "chaos" on the burner, he thinks. It was clearly a delay tactic. However,  businesses may still hike prices as a hedge against what they feel about the future. We will get a better feel for that within the month, as March and April, the consumer price index and inflation data are released, "Chaos" itself can still have a degree of impact depending upon how much the person in power is trusted, and Trump's erratic behavior does not help the trust factor. It isn't just consumer prices that will tell the tale. The impact of the DOGE chainsaws on federal customer services and funding for human services will begin to be felt by even those who have not been paying attention.

More:

The most important question pollsters can ask is, "Does X care about you?" Choosing the right word theme can make the difference between losers and winners

  "Chaos" is a two-edged sword.  For those who believe Trump's soothing words that it will hurt a little now, but it will be beautiful in the future, and the non-MAGAs who believe it will turn out badly, warning that pain will last, is predictive and unsettling. However, as a political stance now, it does not swing many blue voters who once voted for Trump.   Chaos may be a good description of what is happening now, as Trump reacts to Wall Street crashing and claiming his tariff policies are a negotiating strategy he had always planned.    "Chaos" may need to be replaced soon with "cruel"  if Trump policies becoming a forever painful reality with higher prices and inflation as Democrats have predicted.

 Chaos is a term  that may cause worries to MAGA, but if leaning red, they are keeping the faith it will all turn out fine, and the leaning blue is rallying their voters with Chicken Little, the sky is falling in, warnings.  The term chaos may work for some, but when the sky actually crashes on their heads, it becomes reality even for the MAGA.  We are not there yet in spite of the extreme Wall Street gyrations.  When the tariffs actually impact the costs of what people want or need to buy or spend money on, Chicken Little comes home to roost.  Chaos is no longer the theme Democrats should embrace, but another word needs to become the theme.. depending on the severity. MAGA becomes the party of needless pain to benefit the rich. "Cruel." is a better pejorative, and the reminder of how Trump's promises failed them, should be, MAGA, "you voted for this?"

.By far, the better stance is the sub-theme that whatever MAGA is doing, they do not care about those who never seem to have enough to make ends meet. They are the party of "let them eat cake", disconnected for the real life people are actually experiencing.  Trump cares mostly for those who have some money to pay for what they need or want, regardless of cost (like oligarchs and billionaires ).What politicians call such people is problematic. Depending on the candidate, those are called working class, middle class, or something similar, which is a handy term that some may not describe where they are...poor and old or facing large expenses on cars, home ownership, or expensive medical challenges, or unemployment.  Working class is economic, socialist jargon to which not all can relate.  American optimism is that, unlike in Europe, it is possible to live the American dream even if you come from economic deprivation. You are not stuck in a "class," but there is hope for upward mobility.

" Kitchen table" worries can resonate, but... better still ...worried about making ends meet is a better description of a wide range of economic "classes". Some may just be worried about even affording the bare necessities of a place to live and food to eat, and more will worry about whether they can afford college tuition, take a vacation, or buy or replace electronics, appliances, and a new or used car.  Some may be even well off but are penny pinchers by nature. Some who experience layoffs may find themselves sinking into a lower "class". I remember as a radio talk show host on consumer affairs, I received blowback from listeners who resented being placed in an economic class for political purposes. Many people do not see themselves fitting into any class.  It works for Bernie and AOC, but the people impacted by MAGA/Trump/Musk are more than just the lower middle income and poor, but also stretch into the middle income.  We are all consumers, but not everyone in that group is price sensitive or is on a budget. It does however relate to more than just those struggling to pay for basic necessities, but also those who are resenting being screwed by price hikes and inflation who are better heeled.

Sunday, March 23, 2025

The anti-oligarch tour's success should not be a surprise: Tracking its rise


 https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2024/12/new-resistance-opportunity-arises.html updated 3/23/2025

New resistance opportunity arises: Rule by oligarchs and class warfare updated through 3/23/ 2025 from its beginning in December, 2024



Update: 3/23/2025
Disturbed because of the growing crowds supporting the Bernie Sanders/AOC anti-oligarch tour? The rowdy, disruptive attendees at the GOP town halls? When MAGA controls the White House and the majority of Congress and proposes to end democracy as we know it, and Musk is empowered to take a chainsaw to government regardless of human casualties, that is darn radical from the extreme right, so do not be surprised as the left responses in radical terms, too. Extremism begets extremist responses. You should not have been surprised. Biden, by the way, hardly a radical, saw it coming, and kicked it off.

Update 3/31/2025: The accusation from the right wing is that those attending GOP townhalls are dominated by rowdy anti-trump crowds, are organized by left-leaning political organizers and are paid to attend, so it does not represent the voters is more than just being dismissive or smearing the attendees to explain why this is happening to their MAGA wing. Don't be fooled, exhorts Trump. First: prove the accusation that those attendees are paid. (Evidence is missing, so prove it.) Second: where are the MAGA counter crowds at the same events? (Not those that only allow screened MAGA attendees to the GOP townhalls). Those town halls are also open events, but MAGA could attend and push back. They do not. Why? Is it a lack of organization on MAGA's part, or a lack of enough enthusiasm for what Trump is doing? Or is it that anger is a greater motivator
for political action? If it is the latter, that should be a warning sign for the GOP in the midterms and they are fooling themselves.

One issue that has not gotten as much attention as it should is how corrupt the Trump regime is and the open corruption that oligarchs like Musk represents and fosters. Update: 4/1/2025 The  Trump administration is clearing the way for corruption. Corruption is being legitimized in various ways. Bribery and influence peddling are disguised as campaign contributions or buying Trump's enterprise offerings. Trump Store launched 168 products to profit off presidential transition period - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington   In addition,, the Trump  family is heavily involved in their own crypto business. Trump Family Venture Plunges Deeper Into Crypto With New ‘Stablecoin’ - WSJ. Now, Trump has become the fox in the henhouse, in charge of the regulation of his own stablecoin enterprise. Conflicts of interest are no longer taboo as Musk has also shown with his $38 billion worth of federal contracts. Trump's tariffs on imported autos will benefit Tesla per Bloomberg. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uP1a3svt5WE




Posting 12/17/2024 continuously updated. through 3/23/2025...reposted...to track its rise. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5210406-trump-protesters-rail-against-rep/




Update: 1 16 2025:  Biden's farewell address: his warning about oligarchs' rule destroying democracy: Biden delivers farewell address, warns of 'oligarchy' taking shape in America | AP News


Update: 1 27 2025.  The left thinks Biden should be indicted for letting the billionaires get rich during his term, so he calls them oligarchs. Here is where this "indictment" went off the rails. Yes, the ultra-rich billionaires rose, but it took more than 4 years. That is not the issue: the issue is what the billionaires are doing, which is to take over the political power of the nation, having already conquered the economic power. When they merit an office in the West Wing and whisper daily into Trump's ear, that is when they leap from just a billionaire to oligarchdom. In fact, they are even more powerful than the oligarchs supporting Putin, who simply kills them off if they misbehave. The oligarchs put Putin in power, and once there, Putin kicked them out of his government. That may be the fate of the oligopoly under Trump, too. However, Trump is still consolidating his power and needs their help. Our version deserves the title of oligarch because of their political roles, which lifts them above the other extremely rich. They are robber barons, ok. Not just deserving that indictment as monopolists and vulture capitalists, they have branched out by trying to get more tax relief and do away with environmental and consumer protections and social programs to balance off their assault on the treasury. They stand ready and willing to buy any politician who stands in their way. The political power they now have is what needs to be indicted, along with Trump giving them the seat of honor at his table.

Update: 1 /14/2025
I picked up a disturbing line in last Monday's Rachel Maddow show: " We have already lost our democracy. " . My follow-up question is: Can we get it back, and how can we? Ideas, comments? My own thoughts are that on November 5, 2024, 49.9 of voters handed over governance to this country to an autocracy, fed and influenced by oligarchs, and enabled by his Supreme Court to give him immunity from prosecution for criminal acts while performing his official duties.On January 21, 2025, Trump will finalize the takeover by signing 100 executive orders, mostly concerning the implementation of Project 2025, an attempt to place all power in the hands of the executive branch, and reduce the influence of the two other branches by appointees and threats, including violence. The business community is already falling all over themselves bending their knees, ending DEI, and ending fact-checking, mostly out of fear of the abuse of power, from the DOJ and regulatory agencies.
 
Continuing the original 12/17/2024  post:Trump's reliance on oligarch contributions to his campaign and his fawning, and surrounding himself, his cabinet, and his advisers with the current crop of the ultra-rich is ripe for a resistance campaign issue for the midterms. Trump's rule by an administration filled with billionaires that he is planning for his next act is a gift to Democrats as they plot strategy for the midterms in 2026 to get back those working-class voters they lost in 2024. Democrats can and should make a bigger deal of class warfare. It is low-hanging fruit, obvious and visible, and Democrats have a tradition and a credible track record of supporting the middle class ' pocketbook interests.

From my blog posting 1/13/2025 :If we have lost our democracy,  can we get it back? Preserving and restoration of democracy is not an effective pitch to motivate voters. We just got a lesson in that. In fact, at the risk of stating the obvious, what works is understanding and illustrating what voters feel in their lives and directing messaging to their real-life concerns. If democracy is mentioned, it should be that democracy will and can be the best vehicle to reflect and fix the problems important to "ordinary people" rather than an out-of-control kleptocracy and corruption of a Trump autocracy.

The problem is that in 2024, the fear of the loss of democracy was not taken seriously, not understood, nor urgent, and not relevant to everyday life, in spite of the Democrats making Trump's threat to democracy a major campaign issue. Experience is the best teacher if the connection between who and what is at fault can be made and voters are made aware of how they have been hurt. If and when Trump fails to deliver on such promises as rolling back grocery prices, keeping gas at the pump affordable, stopping inflation, and making health care and general living more affordable, will those swing voters, the non-racist motivated ones, be receptive to the message and will the pendulum swing the other way. The trust in Trump, that whatever he does that is good for him is good for you and me too, is a bond that needs to be broken. Trump will continue to win the race-sensitive part of the MAGA block with his anti-DEI, Project 2025 White nationalist agenda, and cruel immigration policies.


GOP priorities regarding tax policy are designed to make the rich richer by extending the tax cuts the rich love. Either they blow the hole bigger than now in the deficit or cut social programs that benefit the middle class and the working poor. Health care, social security and Medicare are targets, among others. This one issue alone is ripe for class warfare. The burning question Democrats need to ask at every opportunity is "How does that benefit whom" and they need to then be ready to point out their alternatives. The GOP has been handed a gift: recovery from COVID-19, putting the breaks on inflation, and jobs for everyone who more or less paid enough to keep up with inflation. Now, let us see what they do with that.

This is a good summary of the GOP's legislative agenda:  https://www.cbsnews.com/news/119th-new-congress-to-do-list-priorities   If this is it, I see nothing in it that will improve the lives of "ordinary Americans". In the meantime, both the executive branch and Congress run by the GOP support and promise policies, including tariffs and immigration, guaranteed to stoke the flames of inflation again. The GOP has to get it right before the midterms for those who say they voted for Trump because of the economy. How the GOP will offset negative fallout will be carrying out their white Christian agenda as planned in Project 2025, which has little to do with Congressional action but relies on executive orders.   Expect every possible failure by the Trump administration on economic policies to blame immigrants who are black and brown or foreign.  So far, this racist, hate approach, fear, and blame the "others" has been a winning strategy for every wannabe and current strongman dictator from Putin to Orban to Erdogan to Trump.  

The most damaging blow to democracy was Citizens United where contributions could be hidden by corporations in lobby and interest groups and political committees. We used to be able to see who contributed. Now they are hidden thanks to the absurd Scotus opinion corporations are people and have rights Musk was brazen. Nothing hidden there:$ 277 million. https://www.msn.com/.../elon-musk-put-277-million-into...       If there is one change that would help democracy survive as it was meant to be, it would be to undo the Citizens United opinion.  The other would be to undo political gerrymandering, another bad Scotus opinion. This permits those with money to determine the outcome of representative bodies by threatening to provide enough money to "primary" someone who steps out of line. Musk just did it. Republicans dismiss Elon Musk's threats after bill rejection

This is not just a USA problem, but a world one. Update 1 20 2025: Billionaire wealth surged in 2024, says Oxfam as world leaders meet for Davos

Update 1 16 2025: Those who own the message media can control minds.  The oligarchs are well on their way to doing it: 

Mark Zuckerberg Drops DEI And Fact Checking - Search News

 https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/a-30-million-campaign-to-free-social-media-from-billionaire-control-is-now-underway/

Donald Trump has threatened to shut down broadcasters, but can he?

How Hungary's Orbán uses control of the media to escape scrutiny and keep the public in the dark | The Associated Press




Elon Musk, a person who could fit the definition of an oligarch, has recently become Trump's alter ego. Now that Elon Musk seems to be running the transition and Trump sits in Mar A Lago nodding his head, Musk deserves real scrutiny. Do we really want that powerful influence over Trump by Musk, who is revealing himself as a neo-Nazi sympathizer? He just congratulated the AFD party in Germany for its recent showing and called it the savior of Germany, a party widely recognized by many as a neo-nazi party. It should not come as a surprise.  Trump has given American neo-Nazis a public platform since taking over Twitter (now X).
He is under scrutiny by the Securities and Exchange Commission for failing to comply with the SEC rules in his purchase of X. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/14/sec-sues-musk-alleges-failure-to-properly-disclose-twitter-ownership.html  In the newTrump regime, we should be watching what happens with this suit and whether it is dropped.  

Some (writing opinions) even think Musk wants to rule the world. This would explain his meddling in other countries' affairs.  We used to dismiss a person  who pulls the world's strings as nothing but a paranoid delusion. That thought the Musk would attempt to be such a force is frightening. Elon Musk seeks to install himself as global dictator – and 'so far it's working': expert


Update: 1 14 2025 In reaction to rumors that Musk is considering buying TikTok and Zuckerberg caved into Trump and stopped fact-checking on Facebook, this is very important; non-profit media is launching an effort to keep social media out of the hands of billionaires. In the meantime, like never before, social media should be treated as people's opinions but not as a source of credible facts and data. My policy is to list the sources of my facts and data cite and what is influencing my opinions on my blog or on social media postings. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/a-30-million-campaign-to-free-social-media-from-billionaire-control-is-now-underway/

 In 2024,  Democrats raised the fear that oligarchs would damage democracy (https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2024/10/democracy-has-oligarch-problem.html) and instead made combatting MAGA's extreme positions on choice and minority rights and other cultural issues their prime issues.Harris did her best to talk about grocery and gas prices and the high cost of housing and presented some constructive ideas to deal with it, but Trump, the ever real estate promoter and con man, sounded more credible, pointed to low prices pre COVID to make America great again  though he had no plans.  We know how that turned out. We also know he can't deliver, already saying" it is too hard to do it." Now, in Trump.2  it appears that the middle class and working families will also be the victims of the oligarch influence over Trump. 

The rule of billionaires in this second Trump administration is likely to be Trump's Achilles heel. Dems can take aim at those super-rich to the extent that billionaires 1) do not know what wage earners have to do to make ends meet and 2) don't care because they only see public policy good that increases their wealth in tax policy and deregulation. 3) Billionaires often see offsetting the cost of their tax cuts and the damage of doing that by cutting social security health care, feeding the poor, etc, that make the middle-class and working poor's lives easier. Therein lies the reasons Dems can and should engage in class warfare as a contrast to their policies that help wage earners and, the middle class and the needy. They have a track record of advocating, supporting, and protecting the middle class that the GOP does not have. Trump's billionaire appointees plan is a new opportunity ripe for attack not available to Democrats in 2024.

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2024/11/resistance-is-not-enough-democrats-have.html

Post 2024 election, the billionaire contributions to Trump continued per this meme, data unverified but worthy of attention: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18SyzrraVK/


WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BILLIONAIRES AND OLIGARCHS  Are all billionaires oligarchs? I have my own take on that. Oligarchs are those who participate in an oligarchy. is an interesting evolution of the usage of the word oligarchs that has roots in economic terms, in how many limited numbers of companies control a "market', or specific sectors of the economy. 

Oligarchs also wield more power than just in business. They are politically involved and control more than one power center, such as the media and political positions, informal or formal.  An oligarch is now most frequently associated with political power.  Not all billionaires are oligarchs, but an oligarch is usually a billionaire or at least a multi-millionaire.
 However, Putin's regime is supported by what Russians call oligarchs...very rich Russians who act on Putin's behalf (or meet unfortunate deaths if they do not). It has become more of a political term than a business/market term.   The term oligarch resembles the US. It has become a political description of a billionaire tied up in political power that resembles the Russian counterparts. I see it in that context. 

 Is Trump an oligarch? If not, he is at least an aspiring one. He acts like one and surrounds himself with bonafide ones to such an extent that at least he appears to treat them as his peer group. Recently, in the passage of the continuing resolution for keeping the government open and his failure to get what he wanted (ending the debt ceiling), he looked like he bowed to his peer, Elon Musk, and Musk's attempt to blow up the bi-partisan deal reached earlier. 

This is a potential issue, and to the extent those like Elon Musk and others hurt ordinary Americans, it needs to be followed closely. It also depends upon the messaging skills of Democrats to make the connection, to date, at best, poor.  The opportunity is there. Not only is it a class clash, but it also has practical consequences that will hurt Americans in their gut of pocketbook issues. If what the oligarchs do appears to be self-serving, wealth-building while the rest of us take it on the chin can become a major issue.  It is especially ripe if what appears to ordinary people is that those like Musk who proposes hurting and cutting out federal programs such as Obamacare and Social Security, consumer protections from abusive business practices and unsafe products are the oligarch's way of offsetting the tax cuts and regulatory requirements.

Is Elon Musk an oligarch? He fits my definition of an oligarch, and he is an example of one who attempts to influence political policy and candidates to benefit him.  Musk controls many sectors, including automotive EVs. social media via Twitter/X , and space exploration.He seems to think at this moment that he also controls Congress, the executive branch, and the GOP.  MAGA seems willing to dance to his tune.  The significance of the House vote on whether to shut down the government or fund it on December 20 was that even Elon could not control that.  Trump looked like he, too, was dancing to Musk's tune, following his lead on the budget ceiling, which both Musk and Trump failed to get it included in the final version.
 .
Musk proposes to cut out the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau so he can avoid regulation when he turns X( formerly Twitter) into a consumer bank and service site. He also wants to destroy reports of Tesla crashes. Bad for business. (per an expose by Rachel Maddow 12/16/2024) and  Trump team set to end key vehicle safety rule opposed by Elon Musk's Tesla: report     So now the oligarchs are proposing to cut the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau over outrage that $35 late fee is being reduced to $5 in the waning days of the Biden administration.  The yelp from the finance companies over this outrageous money/profit generation that screwed consumers is heard on FOX.  Whose side is MAGA on? The finance companies or their loyal consumers? Obviously, those getting screwed by this are the consumers; those demanding this profit center are the finance companies.  Let's see how this one plays out.https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/cfpb-has-been-an-absolute-disaster-ej-antoni-explains-what-doge-should-cut-first/

Friday, March 21, 2025

What's the big deal about democracy? Who cares? Updated through 4/29/2025

Wonder how Trump is able to ignore his promises to reduce the cost of living and subvert Social Security? It has to do with ending the form of democracy we have had. What's the big deal about democracy? Who cares? What seems strange to me is that there are those who would prefer an autocracy, dictatorship, rule by a strong man, king, or fascist to democracy. I would never have thought in my lifetime I would ever have to defend democracy and the rule of law to my fellow Americans. Then Trump came along. 38% of Americans under age 30 support these nondemocratic alternatives, compared with 29% of those ages 50 to 64 and 26% of those 65 and older.  https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/02/28/who-likes-authoritarianism-and-how-do-they-want-to-change-their-government/ 

Why care about democracy? What is so bad about ending the practice of the form of democracy we have had and replacing it with one headed by an autocrat (dictator, fascist, king, etc). There are some serious downsides. This is a warning for ordinary people who do not think democracy works for them and seek a government headed by a "strong leader" instead, from young adults to adults who should know better, fawning over a dictator in Hungary. There are others who would not mind a dictator, just so it was "their dictator" who channeled their desires. They have no idea how much worse it could be for them. 

 So what's so bad about implementing a new form of government where a few rules constrain abuses and so much power is placed in a president's hands without checks and balances? It means that America is no longer being ruled by and for the people, which is basic to democracy's meaning. Trump is able to implement a power-grabbing plan on steroids because he has few checks left to stop his abuse of power, is immune from prosecution, and is a lame duck who will not face voters again. You see it happening before your very eyes in the first 3 months of Trump's second presidency. That is what the Trump administration is attempting to implement without rewriting the Constitution itself, by re-interpreting, redefining it, rewording implementing legislation, and appointing loyalists to Trump himself to administer it.  The Trump administration aims to turn the executive branch into one big, all-powerful, unitary government led by its head, President Trump, with the powers of a strong man, a dictator, a king, a fascist, or similar.  The other two branches of government, the judiciary and Congress, are expected to act as support groups for this executive branch.

The downsides  of a dictatorship," strong man" president, autocracy, king,  fascism, in a nutshell:

1) The people's voice and needs can be easily ignored. With so much money and power in a few hands and few checks left to curb power, a few in charge can pursue their obsessions, which may not be yours or the ones the strong man promised when he was preparing to assume the reins of power. 

2) It is unfair to favor those with power and money and subvert or ignore laws that all once had to abide by.    It is unfair. It is not fair to all, but it benefits only one side, the winners and those who hold the reins of power and money. 

3) Fear permeates words and actions throughout society, government, and business.. The repercussions, however, are on the people who are made to fear what happens if they are not loyal to the ruling group or who dare to challenge them. It drives speech and action instead of caring what is helpful to the public good or constituents..Fear of loss of income or political position drives private and public policy leaders to repeat the leader's talking points, whether or not they agree, bow to the president's demands, or keep quiet. Placing federal law enforcement in the president's total control, the Department of Justice is the enforcer. 

From a March 5 posting on this site: I have recently noted a greater sensitivity to what I am posting on the internet, fear that somehow jobs will be affected if commenters are seen as too liberal or as contradicting Trump, or could be accused of disagreeing.  That kind of fear was more like what I experienced in dictatorships.  In short, fear is causing a lot of self-editing to make sure what I write is mine or at least comes from some publicly published source that has credibility.  Some have even changed their Facebook names because they fear facing repercussions, which is scary to have to feel that way.  This already is no longer a free country. It is feeling like we are already in a country run by dictator who uses fear, threats, and revenge to control what people used to freely express. I will not be cowed or bowed, but I will be more careful to make sure I do not quote those who do not want to be quoted or who are living in that fear so long as I have access to a public platform.  https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2025/03/are-we-already-living-with-fascism.html

The Trump regime is already acting as if democracy is dead and Trump is attempting to govern by executive orders that defy law and the Constitution, while losing case after case in the courts. Fear of repercussions of defying Trump himself, bent on revenge and retribution, and using his political capital with fear and favor, is already evident. GOP House members have been cowed into obedience, fearing being primaried or called out in tweets and by Trump-friendly media, and influenced by promises of campaign contributions conditional on good behavior. He took control of the press pool, which could question and cover him, assuring that there would be no questions whose answers would be embarrassing or challenging, encouraging softball questions, allowing Trump to pitch his views..White House takes control of press pool that covers Trump. Much of the press is self-censoring or toning down opposition.  The only effective pushback left is the courts,  demonstrations in the streets, and the next two elections, the Congressional elections in 2026 and the presidential ones in 2028.

The Trump regime is trying to control the election process in ways to suppress votes of those who may vote for the "other side"...by banning mail in ballots (Colorado is nearly 100 percent mail in) and in requiring proof of citizenship which older voters and and rural and minority voters would have to go to an enormous effort to get.'Near-limitless authority': Trump reportedly moves to make sure GOP can't lose elections The issue is not discrimination so much as it is that the federal government does not have the right to dictate to states such stuff.  The Court case to follow is: Lawsuit challenges Trump's new rules for national elections       The 5th Circuit is referred to in the article: for background, The 5th Circuit’s terrible Supreme Court term | The Texas Tribune

More about the downsides of an autocracy, dictatorship, fascist form of government that is actually happening before our very eyes now.

People do not rule: oligarchs and  Trump do  

 People do not rule or set priorities. Trump does. The voice and the needs of the people can be ignored. People no longer rule to set public policy; a small group makes decisions and sets priorities and agendas, mostly to benefit the ruling group, without observing rules and laws and without having to experience repercussions. The essence of democracy is rule by the people themselves through their representatives. The people are no longer in charge of shaping how they are governed because the rulers control the levers of power in dictatorships (called more politely" autocracies"...rule by one man). The voice of the people is no longer in control of setting priorities to benefit them. 

We have had three months to get a taste of what an autocracy, ruled by a strong man, a dictator, is like. Trump does not care about reducing the cost of living of ordinary Americans as a priority. He has other priorities that are his own. His priorities to date have been consolidating power, getting revenge on those who got in his way earlier and now, tariffs,  and dealing away Ukraine to buddy Putin. He can ignore his own voters on that issue since he is now so powerful, and he has other matters on his agenda, has immunity from prosecution, and is a lame duck who will not meet voter approval again.  MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: Buyers beware: con men and billionaires at work updated through 3/22/2025

(Update 4 29 2025) Trump's response to sinking polls are a case in point. Immediately he confirmed he was not breaking off tariffs, and that someday it all would be better.  How can he get away with this?  He got elected, and he does plan to face voters again.  It's thanks for your vote and tooodledooo. That is what it is so instructive. It is how. and why the government of , for , and by the people can be destroyed by a wannabe fascist who thinks he is already in control of the country.)

So far Trump has gotten away with engineering a trade war and a negative impact on consumers and the economy.  How has he done it? He has already assumed he is a dictator and is acting like one. The real reason Trump is destroying the economy

Not only that, Trump has taken Project 2025 a step further in remaking and increasing the executive branch's power. Instead of changing civil servants' classification from a merit system to political appointees as proposed by Project 2025, Trump has taken a shortcut: Musk and DOGE. They have tried or actually eliminated by some executive order or an email entire departments or have crippled the agency or department's ability to execute laws authorized and funded by Congress. The advantage that such companies as Musk have is that by firing everyone, they can, while using the savings of no longer having to provide services, they can offset tax reductions to the very rich and themselves and pick up more government contracts as those services are privatized after their intentional kneecapping of them.  The courts have already begun to fight back with rulings that such actions were against the law and/or the Constitution. How that plays out will likely determine the future of democracy in America because the majority in the other branch of government, Congress, has subjugated itself to Trump's will.  

Except for Musk's DOGE chainsaw massacre of the federal bureaucracy, Trump is in the process of implementing the 2025 agenda.  You were warned. Per warnings from progressives in October 2024, "Project 2025 unabashedly promotes the wholesale violation of norms and laws, consolidating enormous power in a president and trampling on Congress’ constitutional role—to take away Americans’ long-cherished freedoms and opportunities. Not only would this authoritarian  playbook make it easier for a far-right executive branch to weaken the independence of public agencies, install political cronies   the government, punish people it disagrees with, and control what news the media can report, but it would also allow the government to eliminate abortion access, health care choices, overtime pay, educational opportunities, and countless other programs that benefit communities and families." Project 2025 Would Destroy the U.S. System of Checks and Balances and Create an Imperial Presidency - Center for American Progress   Such warnings were passed off as political oratory or hyperbolic fear-mongering by so many. Surprise.

Trump has not yet crowned himself emperor, but he is trying at least to be a tyrannical king and kill off democracy as we have known it for 250 years.  He has whipped the GOP majority into a subservient support group in Congress using his primary weapons of fear and favor, particularly threatening to run his oligarch-funded candidates in GOP primaries who dare raise their voices against any of Trump's desires. He is now weaponizing his Department of Justice to harass, sue, and charge with crimes any judge who does not rule in his favor.  He is aiming for a showdown with the Supreme Court on this issue, and his attorney general and others in his administration have said they do not have to abide by court decisions if they "disagree" with the findings. That takedown of the judicial branch is in the process now, as the courts are the only bodies still telling him "No, you can't" and braving threats of violence against them. Once the judiciary and Congress have been emasculated, he need not worry again about anyone standing in his way of carrying out his obsessions and permitting him to ignore any other considerations, including a populace trying to make ends meet in their daily lives.

What's so bad about that? There are those who supported Trump in 2024 because they wanted a "strong leader" to carry out the white nationalist agenda of Project 2025, attacking DEI, or a desire for someone to get rid of recent brown and black immigrants who had simply had "jumped the river" without documents, recently or many years before, and never had a criminal charge on their records. On those promises, Trump is making good.

 Where he has failed is to lower gas and grocery prices or rents. Per exit polls, it was the main issue driving voters to give him a win in 2024.  y..and the stand-in for high prices and inflation was the cost of eggs.  https://www.cbsnews.com/news/exit-polls-2024-presidential-election/So far, not only has Trump ignored the issue, but his administration has warned consumers it will get worse, so it will somehow get better (for whom and how?) "You'll like the result". https://fortune.com/2025/03/04/target-fortune-500-ceo-trump-tariff-price-increase.   During the first 6 weeks, Trump has been obsessed with tariffs, mass deportations, controlling Zelensky, and getting revenge on those who challenge him.  His obsessions have not included lowering grocery prices or the cost of living. MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: Why Trump voters are getting ignored. Taking stock of Trump's first six weeks He has just ignored the issue being consumed in other obsessions., getting revenge on those who ever did him wrong, punishing those who challenge his authority using the weaponized DOJ,  starting a tariff war, talking about annexing Canada, Greenland, and Panama like an imperialist and his hero/role model Putin, and getting back at Zelendsky for not rolling over and accepting Russian dominance or eventual takeover.  Above all, his obsession has been, if not in the title, becoming a king, a tyrannical one at that, as he takes advantage of the immunity granted him by his Supreme Court that he now claims to extend to more than just criminal acts. For Trump, laws are either to be ignored, worked around, or defied. The rule of law itself is the enemy. Whether he succeeds in defying the courts is a work still in progress.  

Unfair

What Trump wants is not fair to all.   Using fear and favor as his unchecked weapons also blows back on those 48% of the voters who did not vote for him. The rich and loyal are favored.   Civil rights are no longer honored, as well, as DEI( diversity, equity, and inclusion) has become a dirty word and has disappeared from the Trump lexicon.  Fairness is no longer a value, and the advantage goes to the donors and proven MAGA supporters. 

Our traditional form of democracy is uniquely suited for a country with a diverse population. When these very important provisions of checks and balances and human rights are respected and observed in practice, we have our unique form of democracy, which works in a country with diverse interests and populations.  Those on the right like to point to countries that seem to be successful with dictators, such as Hungary. Hungary differs from the US in its makeup..around .90% of the same ethnic and religious demographics. The US is a country of immigrants worldwide that works when all are treated fairly. That is the Constitution's structure: rules that rule and are applied equally to all regardless of ethnic, religious, racial, or gender status. Those are the goals and ideology, which if followed, will lead to a "more perfect union" that permits a person to pursue life, liberty, and happiness, in peace. The anti-DEI crusade, eliminating the ability to enforce and value diversity, purging all DEI administrators, and removing references to DEI throughout the entire federal government, is how these values of diversity, equity, and inclusion are being trashed to favor white nationalists' aspirations.  


MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: When it comes to corruption, Trump is now the fox in the henhouse

The rule of law that provides the assurance of fairness is replaced by the rule of the few who determine which laws, how they are interpreted, and how they are enforced to benefit those who have the power and the money. There is no more level playing field. MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: What's the big deal about the rule of law? Who cares?

Fear

The Trump regime is already acting as if democracy is dead and Trump is attempting to govern by executive orders that defy law and the Constitution, while losing case after case in the courts. Fear of repercussions of defying Trump himself, bent on revenge and retribution, and using his political capital with fear and favor, is already evident. GOP House members have been cowed into obedience, fearing being primaried or called out in tweets and by Trump-friendly media, and influenced by promises of campaign contributions conditional on good behavior. Much of the press is self-censoring or toning down opposition. The only effective pushback left is the courts,  demonstrations in the streets, and the next two elections, the Congressional elections in 2026 and the presidential ones in 2028.

The fear factor in Trump's power grab is already palpable, both in media self-censoring themselves and in individuals' pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness.  Those who speak out or challenge Trump will have repercussions. They may be "delicensed", defined, demoted, destroyed with tweets, and subjected to unjustified legal processes. Judges have to up their family security due to threats from those unleashed by Trump, who openly personally insults any judge who rules against him.  The press watches its words and reporting to avoid suits and or delicensing or being blocked from access to the White House or Air Force One. Students expressing their own anti-administration opinions and academic institutions are under attack, snatched from the street by ICE regardless of visa status, and federal money is denied until universities agree to Trump-imposed restrictions.


 Up close and personal: my observations of what it is like for ordinary people in a dictatorship, or in the most recent term, a kingdom, or under fascism (the term that is considered too inflammatory because it evokes the Nazi party, when there are many variations and degrees of oppression). Here is what I recall from close and personal encounters with communist dictatorships and once-fascist ones. I didn't learn all of this from books; I lived it, visiting family in Yugoslavia, a communist dictatorship, over 15 years, and as a student in pre-wall Berlin in the late 1950s. The ideologies may be very different, but the methods of government are very similar. How are fascist dictators and communist dictators alike?.  Both are dictatorships by strong men or small groups of them, ruling over people, but people have few rights or power to influence the application of laws or policies, and fear, oppression of dissent, and favor are tools of discipline..  In a communist dictatorship of communists, the alliance is based on Marxist ideology, the rule of one class, the proletariat, and in a fascist dictatorship, the alliance is between the strong man and big business interests (we call billionaires or oligarchs). By that definition, even Putin is a fascist, though he governs as if he were still a KGB agent in the Soviet Union.

Here is a brief description of my own up close and personal encounters with both fascism and communism in a reprint of an Oct.25 2024 blog post.  This is why I am attacking Trump for planning and promising to become a fascist-like dictator and why I am so alarmed that so many do not care. It is personal to me. I have been there and done that. What became history to my children and grandchildren were current events to me. I was born in 1938 and have vivid memories of World War II . Even in my 6 and 7-year-old brain, I knew what enemies of America looked like and., and if we did not beat the Nazis, I experienced the fear my parents felt we would be governed by the evil fascists. We didn't know about Auschwitz yet.. As a 20-year-old, I spent my college junior year in rubble-emerging, war-devastated, pre-wall Berlin, and I had a first-row seat to how Communist dictators consolidated their power in the East Zone they controlled. It was in Berlin I met my husband-to-be of 52 years, who was planning to be a refugee from the communist dictatorship of Yugoslavia. He succeeded, even when threatened by foreign agents. I know how it works firsthand in both communist and fascist dictatorships; how individual liberties are destroyed, from the lost choices of a future profession., the fear of saying aloud what you really thought, the inability to break out of the restraints of mind-controlling propagandized media, the corruption such systems foster and how everyday life is controlled. To see America thinking about becoming a fascist dictatorship under the leadership of Donald Trump, one who tried to be one when he was president, and now is so open about becoming one in practice, is a bookend to my life that horrifies me. Those younger than me do not have a clue of the dangers and the loss of so many freedoms of what they wish. It is an irony of my life that I was born in the times of fascism and could die in the times of fascism and that I was so fortunate to live in American democracy in the years in between.

For those who object to Trump being tagged as a fascist, as those who knew him best call him "fascist to the core" and "he fits the definition", here are the definitions and reasons for not only my agreement but for raising the issue on this site for several years: Argue with me if you will. MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: Gen.Milley and Gen.Kelly aren't kidding " Trump's a fascist updated 10/25/24

Anti-Semitism, as personified in George Soros's conspiracy theories, has a relationship to right-wing propaganda. Every time the right attacks demonstrations and citizen actions against them, they blame it on George Soros. He is either so all-powerful he is threatening them effectively singlehandedly, or he is a code word for lots of anti-Semitic conspiracies and tropes. For sure, it plays on traditional anti-semitism of some worldwide conspiracy of Jews. His activism has its roots in a personal revolt against fascism. It is a way the right tries to explain why people are pushing back against them: the people are not to blame; George Soros is. It is akin to the same motivating propaganda that gave rise to Hitler in the 1930s

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Soros_conspiracy_theories

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-checkfalseclaims-about-george-soros-idUSKBN23P2X7/

https://fortune.com/2025/03/04/target-fortune-500-ceo-trump-tariff-price-increase.   

 MUFTIC FORUM BLOG: Why Trump voters are getting ignored. Taking stock of Trump's first six weeks

https://apnews.com/article/trump-project-2025-administration-nominees-843f5ff20131ccba5f056e7ccc5baf23

Monday, January 27, 2025

So what do you call Project 2025 but a corrupt spoils system or billionaires oligarchs?

 This is a reposting update about Democratic party messaging. It was sparked by a thoughtful opinion piece about Democrats using words that only their own libs understand but do not reach others not in the camp. Targeted was Project 2025 and what do you call billionaires, if not oligarchs. I defend the use of oligarchs to describe the billionaires who surround Trump. Project 2025 is the spoils system, corrupt, just as I have done recently. One could go further and call it a power grab for the benefit of Trump and White Christian Nationalists.

Update: 1 27 2025;Messaging again: this opinion piece has a lot of validity. However, what is lacking is what do you call Project 2025 or oligarchs if that is just too intellectual. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/savingandinvesting/trump-s-billionaires-aren-t-oligarchs-they-re-something-else-opinion. Calling out billionaires as billionaires is so what. I like oligarchs because that is what is considered evil in Putin's world, too. The analogy to a dictatorship has its own value. https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2022/03/29/1088886554/how-putin-conquered-russias-oligarchy

. The oligarchs put Putin in power, but once there, he kicked out of government, forced them back to their business lane, and then killed the off or sent the to gulags if they challenged hs power. Trump is still consolidating his power and still needs their help. Besides, they are his friends, peer group, and funders.

Original 11/17/2024 post continues:

MAGA has turned the GOP into the party of the poorly educated and made it easy to manipulate them with simplistic gobbledegook. The challenge for Dems is to speak their language and explain the unintended consequences of simplistic solutions to complex problems. Appropriate messaging to voters of various education levels is key to political success. Democrats are just not good at that. Education is the greatest predictor of how someone will vote. It may be an insurmountable challenge, but they must at least try to improve to reach across the education divide. https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/14/politics/the-biggest-predictor-of-how-someone-will-vote/index.html.

Abstract concepts and warnings of unintended consequences based on facts, data, and historical experiences work in communicating with the more educated. The messaging challenge for Democrats is they have to wait for reality to catch up with their predictions and make the connection in simple, 6th-grade-level terms. That is the average reading comprehensive level for the United States. Democrats need to express themselves in terms that reach them, too. This means speaking to the public just as you would a 6th grader about policies that even Ph.D.s debate. It can be done. MAGA did it.

The lack of reading comprehension is not new. What is new is that Americans have become auditory and visual learners and they get their news and develop opinions shaped by blogs, podcasts, TV personalities, and social media. Simple speak is just that: speak. The problem is that often those who deliver news and opinions also get their information from the written word, too, but translating their views into simple speak takes some skill. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/news-influencers-social-media-pew-report-rcna179786

"I told you so" or "you are too stupid to get it "are not the best responses to the loss Democrats experienced on November 5 as they try to place the blame on "low information voters". Enough of those cost them the election, true, but Democrats in the future need to figure out how to reach them, too. It comes down to asking themselves what those voters are feeling and seeing in their daily lives in the here and now. Political and economic theorizing and warnings about consequences are not on the kitchen table for dinner for those who are not absorbed by politics. The best approach is a cynical one, which is exactly the one MAGA dis. "See, the price of eggs is ridiculous. Remember what it was like when X was in charge? Therefore all of these prices and inflation are their fault, implying vote for him and he will fix it."(whether it was or not true or the hows to do it are missing). Harris attempted to bring messaging down to common terms better than most Democrats lately, but it was not enough, and she was reluctant to criticize Biden. Bill Clinton was the best explainer in the simple language of any politician I can recall. What goes around eventually comes around but at that point placing the blame should be in simplistic language, too. If I ever hear again "existential threat", or other jargon like that, libs need to get their tongues examined. Showing how smart you are to use big words is unhelpful.

Communicating with those who are illiterate or who have 6th-grade reading comprehension abilities takes a special set of skills. For a good part of my professional life, I have specialized in trying to do it in both columns and in books, in politics, and in educating people about being good and smart consumers. I write in simple English and try to avoid jargon. Sometimes I fail and fall into the jargon trap. Other times to alleviate my own frustrations, I write blog postings about messaging failures or suggest maybe "it could be said this way".  

The problem is today's problems are not simple and the solutions to them are complex and the harmful result of ignoring complexities is unintended consequences. ..making the current victims even victimized more. Dumbing down equals dumbed-down policies that the dumbed-down only see it in the price of eggs and then vote for the candidate whose policies will increase the price of eggs.  Democrats need to get their messaging , spoken and written, to the 6th-grade level if they want to make hay in pointing blame in the next two years. 

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2024/11/trumps-achilles-heels-unintended.html

https://mufticforumblog.blogspot.com/2024/11/if-its-economy-stupid-magas-rise-is-its.html

Ooops. https://www.nbcnews.com/.../trump-administration-rescinds... Another stupid is as stupid does by the Trump administration that does not have its act together and put Plan 2025 ideologues in charge at the OMB. https://www.nbcnews.com/.../trump-project-2025-russell...